Modeling the high-energy radiation in gamma-ray binaries Benot - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

modeling the high energy radiation in gamma ray binaries
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Modeling the high-energy radiation in gamma-ray binaries Benot - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Modeling the high-energy radiation in gamma-ray binaries Benot Cerutti In collaboration with Guillaume Dubus & Gilles Henri Laboratoire dAstrophysique de Grenoble, France 2009 Fermi Symposium 1/11 Nov. 2-5 2009, Washington D.C.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Modeling the high-energy radiation in gamma-ray binaries

Benoît Cerutti

In collaboration with Guillaume Dubus & Gilles Henri Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Grenoble, France

1/11 « 2009 Fermi Symposium »

  • Nov. 2-5 2009, Washington D.C.
slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • B. Cerutti

2/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

Some binaries in the gamma-ray sky

LSI+61°303 LS 5039 PSR B1259-63 HESS J0632+057

Extracted from TeVCat

2 kpc 2.5 kpc 1.5 kpc 1.5 kpc

26.5 days 3.9 days 1240 days

?

?

Credit: NASA/DOE/Fermi LAT Collaboration

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • B. Cerutti

3/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

GeV & TeV beacons: The orbital modulation

[Aharonian et al. 2005] [Aharonian et al. 2006] [Albert et al. 2008]

LS 5039 LSI +61°303 PSR B1259-63

TeV

LSI +61°303

[Abdo et al. 2009]

LS 5039

[Abdo et al. 2009]

GeV

  • Orbital modulation GeV and TeV
  • Stable modulation

 Orbital effect

 Richard Dubois’ Talk!!

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • B. Cerutti

4/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

The pulsar wind nebula scenario: The big picture!

[Maraschi & Treves 1981; Dubus 2006b]

High-energy processes:

  • Inverse Compton
  • Synchrotron radiation
  • Pair production

Massive Star Observer! Pulsar γ γ γ e+ e- γ B e± γ γ e± γ γ e±

ZOOM

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • B. Cerutti

5/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

Modeling the high-energy radiation in LS 5039

Pulsar γ γ

  • Emission unshocked wind

[Cerutti et al. 2008]

  • Strong spectral signature!
  • Low Lorentz factor or

highly magnetized wind?

  • Dominant contribution

[Sierpowska-Bartosik & Torres 2008]

  • Emission shocked wind

[Dubus et al. 2008]

Fermi HESS

  • Pulsar spin-down power
  • Magnetic field at the shock
  • Injected electron index

LP=1036 erg/s B=0.8 ± 0.2 G p=2 ± 0.3

EGRET

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • B. Cerutti

6/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

Theoretical GeV & TeV modulation in LS 5039…

Anti-correlation!

  • GeV-TeV anti-correlation due to pair production
  • Computation of 3D pair cascade radiation

with a Monte Carlo code, constraints:

  • Inclination: 40°
  • Max ambient magnetic field: 5 G
  • TeV emitter close to the pulsar

[Dubus 2006a] [Cerutti et al. In preparation]

+ Cascades! Fermi HESS

[Abdo et al. 2009]

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • B. Cerutti

7/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

… as one would observe in the gamma-ray sky!

Fermi HESS

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • B. Cerutti

8/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

New modeling challenges: LSI +61°303 seen by Fermi

[Abdo et al. 2009]

  • GeV modulation :

Max/Min close to periastron/apastron

  • Spectrum:

Power-law + exponential cutoff at 6 GeV !

  • Incompatible with γγ-absorption
  • Magnetospheric pulsar emission?
  • Signature unshocked pulsar wind?

… Cutoff!

GeV-TeV link non trivial!!

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • B. Cerutti

9/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

The pulsar wind nebula scenario: The big picture!

[Maraschi & Treves 1981; Dubus 2006b]

Massive Star Observer ! Pulsar γ γ γ e±

ZOOM

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • B. Cerutti

10/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

GeV excess: Signature of the unshocked pulsar wind?

  • Pulsar spin-down power

LP > 1037 erg/s

  • Electrons energy

103 < γ < 5×104

  • Injected electron index

p=3.1

[Aragona et al. 2009]

MAGIC EGRET Fermi

Apastron Periastron

Shift in phase!? + 0.25 ??

[Abdo et al. 2009]

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • B. Cerutti

11/11 2009 Fermi Symposium

Conclusions

  • Leptonic model can explain the general features but complex

interplay between high-energy processes for:

  • Shocked/unshocked wind components
  • Anisotropic effects
  • Cascades
  • Fermi observations of LSI +61°303:

 Modulation and cutoff spectrum challenge models  Are there 2 different components at HE and VHE?  Signature from an unshocked pulsar wind?

Acknowledgements to A.B. Hill, A. Lamberts & A. Szostek