Multimodal transportation - R Reaping the benefits i th b fit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Atkins Lectures Multimodal transportation - R Reaping the benefits i th b fit Dr. Ghassan Ziadat CEng MICE MIHT Infrastructure Outlook 2014 Infrastructure Outlook 2014 24 - 26 March 2014 Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Riyadh, Kingdom of
Infrastructure Outlook 2014 Infrastructure Outlook 2014 24 - 26 March 2014 Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
future direction
p
communities
demands to meet growing g g economy and population
community, city and state
wider environment wider environment.
through data collection
software for forecasting future traffic scenarios A th i t f t ffi
growth on existing road network
approach.
Data approx. 1995 - Source: Kenworthy and Laube (2001)
Auto city Transit city
Criteria USA Aus/NZ Canada West/South Europe High income Asia
Metropolitan GDP per capita (USD) 31,386 19,775 20,825 32,077 34,797 Passenger cars (per 1,000 people) 587.1 575.4 529.6 413.7 217.3 Passenger car (passenger km per capita) 18,155 11,387 8,645 6,202 3,724 Length of expressway (per 1,000 persons) 156 129 122 82 22 Parking (spaces per 1 000 CBD jobs) 555 505 390 261 121 Parking (spaces per 1,000 CBD jobs) 555 505 390 261 121 Overall average speed of public transport (km/hr) 27.4 32.7 25.1 25.7 33.2 Average road network speed (km/hr) 49.3 44.2 44.5 32.9 31.3 Ratio of public vs private speeds 0 58 0 75 0 57 0 79 1 08 Ratio of public vs private speeds 0.58 0.75 0.57 0.79 1.08 Motorised passenger km on public transport (%) 2.9 7.5 9.8 19.0 50.3 Public transport seat km of service per capita 1,557 3,628 2,290 4,213 5,535 U b d it ( h t ) 15 15 26 55 134 Urban density (persons per hectare) 15 15 26 55 134
Houston, Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Diego
Paris, Stuttgart, Vienna, Oslo, Hamburg, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Ruhr, Nantes, Graz, M ill H l i ki A t d B l B l R Mil B li L d Marseilles, Helsinki, Amsterdam, Brussels, Bologna, Rome, Milan, Berlin, London, Barcelona, Madrid, Glasgow, Manchester, Newcastle, Athens
Johannesburg, Cape Town, Krakow
100 70 80 90 Cars per 100 People Public Transport % 50 60 20 30 40 10 20 Hong Kong Tokyo Singapore London New York Beijing Dubai Riyadh
Source:
W ld B k World Bank
H t
bility Pre TMPQ (2008) roads programme
Scenario 1: Car City
Riyadh Houston
sustainable mob Full expressway d taxi F ll metro
Scenario 2:
Dubai
ependence or s p y programme built by 2017 as planned Bus and Full metro programme
Scenario 2: Car City + Metro by itself
Kuala Lumpur Barcelona
llustrating car d Doha in 2014 Phased, reprioritized and de-scoped expressway programme Metro Programme Phases 1a/1b
Complementary measures BRT/buses Boulevards Feeder systems Walk + Cycle Demand mgmt
Cost risk
benefit
Scenario 3: Transit City All modes + complementary measures
Barcelona Singapore
example cities i programme
Demand mgmt D.U.S.Z.
complementary measures
Hong Kong
Spectrum of e
Riyadh existing
Walking iti
2000
y g
as before
cities Non- motorized transport (Shanghai in 1980s) Small/mid sized bus
2005
Riyadh future
investments as planned (ring roads etc)
Motorcycle cities (HaNoi) sized bus cities (Seoul, Manila in 1970s)
Riyadh existing 2014
measures.
Traffic saturated motorcycle cities (Ho Chi Minh) Traffic saturated bus cities (Bangkok, Jakarta, Manila)
2030
L iti Large transit cities Entrenched traffic saturation (Dubai, Kuala Lumpur?)
Riyadh future Car City
Large car cities (Houston) cities (Hong Kong, Singapore)
>2030 Car City + Metro by itself Transit City Metro + other modes + complementary measures y
– Widen travel choices (LRT, buses and metro) to encourage modal shift – Expand existing bus route network coverage and introduce bus priority measures – Improve accessibility for all users – Improve quality and attractiveness of public transport to encourage patronage Provision of air conditioned shelters and waiting areas – Provision of air-conditioned shelters and waiting areas – Multimodal integration and common ticketing systems – Intelligent transport systems (real time information) – Use of technology and mobile phone applications.
Accessibility Accessibility Everybody should be able to use the interchange inclusively: pedestrians, cyclists, wheelchair users people with Security Certainty R li bl i f i users, people with children, pushchairs, heavy luggage, or shopping, people with movement restriction or problems with sight or Principles of y People need to feel safe while waiting for public transport to arriv, and have confidence that Reliable information
and connections. Real-time travel information is of particular benefit p g hearing. Principles of good interchange design C f t parked bicycles will be safe and secure. Interest particular benefit. Comfort Seating for those less able to stand, protection from extremes of weather and Interest Something to entertain passengers whilst waiting. This could be nearby activity public art or weather and climate, well maintained and clean facilities. activity, public art, or an interesting view. It may be an opportunity for advertising.
Main features:
W52
enhancements.
framework framework
construction in progress
Main features:
extension to Central Business District District
Clinic, 5 Star hotels and residential district district
access as well as LRT and BRT systems systems
supervision (of 150,000m2) substantially complete substantially complete
11 (50,000m2) being tendered.
Main features:
Emirate
complete and construction commenced
and taxi stands through pedestrian links. pedestrian links.
h d d i
the economy and attracts and encourages investment
travel in safety and comfort to work, social events and recreation improves quality of life
less traffic congestion poll tion and carbon emissions
leading to a healthier environment and less impact on climate change
attractiveness and ranking as a modern habitable destination.