The Rules of Engagement: Myths and Mysteries
Barbara DeBaun, RN, MSN, CIC San Diego APIC February 8, 2017
Myths and Mysteries Barbara DeBaun, RN, MSN, CIC San Diego APIC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Rules of Engagement: Myths and Mysteries Barbara DeBaun, RN, MSN, CIC San Diego APIC February 8, 2017 Disclosure Speaker is a consultant to Vestagen Protective Technologies, the sponsor of todays educational program Learning
Barbara DeBaun, RN, MSN, CIC San Diego APIC February 8, 2017
Technologies, the sponsor of today’s educational program
9
Source: Gallup’s “State of the Global Workplace Report, 2013”
10
Evidence is Sufficient
Engages at the Same Time
Message Works with Everyone
Intervention is Equally Easy/Hard to Implement
14
16
Something BIG Belonging Meaningful Journey “I” make a difference
2012 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 January February March April May June July August September October November December
1 or more harms
No Harms
Compliments of St. Francis Hospital, San Francisco
Courtesy of Martha Leighton; Eliot Hospital, Manchester, NH
Non-engaging methods
Non-Engaging Methods
literature passively
because TJC says you must
disseminating a policy
Engaging methods
gaging Methods
fits into the bigger picture (realistic future state)
professional identity
impacted the project
Fertile Ground for Champions Where Champions Work Where Champions Work
Non-engaging methods
Non-Engaging Methods
department
laggard first
adopter who has little credibility
Engaging methods Engaging Methods
have a formal title)
with a few key participants
work out most of the bugs
spokesperson for spread
George Bernard Shaw
work is received: A) Face-to-face with another person? B) Verbal, but not face-to-face (Telephone/webinar)? C) Written (email, text, flyer, snail mail)?
43
Rule #3: Customize Communication
Adapted from Ashkenas, 1995
SHARE INFORMATION SHAPE BEHAVIOR
General Publications
flyers newsletters videos articles posters
Personal Touch
letters cards postcards
Interactive Activities
telephone email visits seminars learning sets modeling
Face-to-face
mentoring seconding shadowing
(C) 2001, Sarah W. Fraser
Public Events
Road shows Fairs Conferences Exhibitions Mass meetings
Non-engaging methods
Non-Engaging Methods
messenger
a title can communicate
the word out”
and arguments for change to everyone
Engaging methods
Engaging Methods
wisely
the stage of implementation and the readiness of your audience
Central Line Bundle Hand Hygiene Readmission Reduction CAUTI Bundle Sepsis Bundles Normothermia after Colorectal Surgery
low complexity, i.e., easy to learn, use, teach
the ability for the innovation to be tried in pieces or without a full commitment Trial-ability compatibility with current ways of doing things Compatibility visible, observable improvement over the "old“ way of doing things Observability Complexity an advantage over the "old" way of doing things Relative Advantage The innovation must be perceived to have: Key factors
CDI ADE
Readmission
CAUTI
SSI VAE
CLABSI
Sepsis
Non-engaging methods
n-Engaging Methods
the hardest group of patients
plan based on prior experience
simultaneous projects with the same strategy
Engaging methods Engaging Methods
most likely to be successful
approaches where possible
approaches to the specifics and challenges of each intervention and unit
Barbara DeBaun, RN, MSN, CIC Improvement Advisor bdebaun@cynosurehealth.org