Non Woven Abrasives Unraveling the Mystery Production Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Non Woven Abrasives Unraveling the Mystery Production Process Plant Tour in Pictures Spray Impregnation Fiber Blender Spray Impregnation Rolling Needling Carding Fiber Fiber Physical Properties Type Polyester vs Nylon Cost
Non Woven Abrasives Unraveling the Mystery
Production Process Plant Tour in Pictures
Spray Impregnation Fiber Blender Spray Impregnation Rolling Needling Carding Fiber
Fiber
Physical Properties • Type – Polyester vs Nylon • Cost vs performance • Denier – Size matters • Strength • Flexibility • Durability • Cut Color Dyed vs natural
Resin
Phenol vs Urethane • Phenol attacks fiber • Phenol is temp resistant • Urethane is more flexible • Urethane is more expensive • Phenol changes color • Urethane has better adhesion to Nylon
Principle of Function
Position of Non Woven products in relation to other abrasive media Heavy Light Stock Conditioning Scratch Stock removal / Surface / removal / removal good finish Good finish polishing Bonded Abrasives Coated Abrasives Wire / Filament Products Non Woven Products Polishing Buffs / Wheels Grit / Set up wheels
Coated vs Nonwoven nonwoven abrasive coated abrasive • Scratch depth • Micro deburring • Consistency of finish • Lower temperature
Comparison of abrasive cut over time for a P120 grit coated abrasive compared to a Coarse A surface conditioning disc 40 35 30 P120# CRS A 25 Cut / g 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time / mins
Comparison of abrasive finish over time for a P120 grit coated abrasive compared to a Coarse A surface conditioning disc 2.4 2.2 2 ____ P120 coated 1.8 ____ CRS A scm 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (Minutes)
Surface finish comparison Profile=R_ISO - Section=[1] • P60 Resin Fiber Disk [um] 5.159 3.333um/cm, x3000.000 • Ra = 2.24 -1.507 • Rt = 13.17 -8.174 • Rz = 11.94 0.400 2.400 [mm] 4.400 Profile=R_ISO - Section=[1] 0.291mm/cm, x34.375 • P120 Resin Fiber [um] 6.270 3.333um/cm, x3000.000 Disk -0.396 • Ra = 0.5 -7.063 • Rt = 3.17 0.400 2.400 [mm] 4.400 • Rz = 2.97 Profile=R_ISO - Section=[1] 0.291mm/cm, x34.375 [um] 6.310 • Coarse SCM (P60) 3.333um/cm, x3000.000 • Ra = 0.45 -0.357 • Rt = 3.5 -7.024 • Rz = 2.9 0.400 2.400 [mm] 4.400 0.291mm/cm, x34.375
Surface finish comparison Profile=R_ISO - Section=[1] [um] 1.604 • P120 Resin Fiber Disk -0.396 • Ra = 0.5 • Rt = 3.17 • Rz = 2.97 -2.396 [um] 1.955 • Coarse SCM • Ra = 0.45 • Rt = 3.5 -0.357 • Rz = 2.9 -2.670
Temperature increase over time for a P120 grit coated abrasive compared to a Coarse A surface conditioning disc 300 250 200 Temp / deg C 150 100 120# S / Steel SCM S / Steel 50 120# Aluminum SCM Aluminum 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 time / secs
Foam Vs. Nonwoven Foam shares properties of both Coated and Non-Wovens – Flexibility – Conformability – 2 dimensional abrasive structure – Surface finish changes over time – Shaped forms (built in tool)
Application
Fleece • CF – Nylon, smaller denier, phenolic. – Handwork, handpads etc. – Light machine finishing • HD – Nylon, large denier, more resin and grit. – Heavy Machine Finishing – Intricate Shapes • SD – Nylon, urethane – Deburring / Edge breaking – Flexibility to access extreme angles
Surface Conditioning Material • Applications for Belts – Cookware – Hardware – Metal Fabrication • Applications for Disks – Weld blending – Refining Coated abrasive grind lines
Technical Wheels • Unitized – Deburring – Weld Blending – Cleaning • Convolute – Deburring – Finishing
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.