Nursing Facility Utilization Review Stakeholder Meeting IG Audit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nursing facility utilization review stakeholder meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nursing Facility Utilization Review Stakeholder Meeting IG Audit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nursing Facility Utilization Review Stakeholder Meeting IG Audit Division March 14, 2016 O FFICE OF I NSPECTOR G ENERAL Texas Health and Human Services Commission Page 1 N URSING F ACILITY MDS 3.0 R EVIEWS AND T RENDS The Utilization Review


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Page 1

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Nursing Facility Utilization Review Stakeholder Meeting

IG Audit Division

March 14, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Page 2

NURSING FACILITY MDS 3.0 REVIEWS

AND TRENDS

The Utilization Review Unit is performing reviews of MDS 3.0 assessments in FY 2016.

  • Previous reviews were conducted in FY 2014 and 2015.
  • Average error rates for reviews in FY 2014 and 2015

were 5.4% and 4.87%, respectively.

  • Nursing facility error rates ranged from 0% to 34.74%.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Page 3

FY 2016 WORK PLAN

The Work Plan for the number

  • f nursing facility reviews is

based on availability of resources, historical outcomes, and other factors such as legislative mandates. *

  • FY 2016 plan is to review 235

nursing facilities in Texas.

  • 102 facilities have been

reviewed as of the end of February.

*Additional information is available on the IG Internet site (https://oig.hhsc.texas.gov/).

FY 2016 Work Plan Progress

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Page 4

NURSING FACILITY ERROR TRENDS

56 36 33 29 15 14 13 11 5 4

FY 2015 Error Trends (Listed from high to low.)

Unsigned Forms Lack of, incomplete, or conflicting documentation Missing forms, records, and/or LTCMI Signatures don't match LTCMI No documented training/training out of date Medical records not systematically organized or readily accessible BIM/RMI not within ARD/look-back period Restorative Nursing - lack of plans, goals not measureable, missing documentation Altered documentation No M.D. visit or visit outside of ARD, or no diagnosis

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Page 5

NURSING FACILITY ERROR TRENDS

32 18 16 11 5 5 4 4 3 3

FY 2016 Error Trends (Listed from high to low.)

Lack of, incomplete, or conflicting documentation Signatures don't match LTCMI Unsigned Forms BIM/RMI not within ARD/look-back period No documented training/training out of date Restorative Nursing - lack of plans, goals not measureable, missing documentation, claims 7 days after ARD Missing forms, records, and/or LTCMI ST/PT/OT Utilization/Incorrect dates of therapy Medical records not systematically organized or readily accessible Orders counted incorrectly

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Page 6

FY 2016 QUARTER 1 REVIEWS AND

DUE PROCESS

285 545 530 102 111 116

35.8% 20.4% 21.9% 100 200 300 400 500 600

  • Sep. 2015
  • Oct. 2015
  • Nov. 2015

% Forms Reviewed with RUG Changes

Forms RUG Changes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Page 7

FY 2016 QUARTER 1 REVIEWS AND

DUE PROCESS

102 111 116 19 44 30

18.6% 39.6% 25.9% 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

  • Sep. 2015
  • Oct. 2015
  • Nov. 2015

% RUG Changes Requested for Reconsideration

RUG Changes Requests for Reconsideration

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Page 8

FY 2016 QUARTER 1 REVIEWS AND

DUE PROCESS

19 44 30 12 42 24

63.2% 95.5% 80.0% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

  • Sep. 2015
  • Oct. 2015
  • Nov. 2015

% of Onsite Review Decisions Upheld at Reconsideration

Reconsidered Forms Decisions Upheld

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Page 9

FY 2016 QUARTER 1 REVIEWS AND

DUE PROCESS

2 1 1 2 3

  • Sep. 2015
  • Oct. 2015
  • Nov. 2015

# Cases With Onsite Decisions Upheld at Reconsideration and Requesting Appeal

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Page 10

Linda Carlson Nursing Facility Program Manager

512-491-2065 Linda.carlson@hhsc.state.tx.us