Page 1
Nursing Facility Utilization Review Stakeholder Meeting IG Audit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Nursing Facility Utilization Review Stakeholder Meeting IG Audit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Nursing Facility Utilization Review Stakeholder Meeting IG Audit Division March 14, 2016 O FFICE OF I NSPECTOR G ENERAL Texas Health and Human Services Commission Page 1 N URSING F ACILITY MDS 3.0 R EVIEWS AND T RENDS The Utilization Review
Page 2
NURSING FACILITY MDS 3.0 REVIEWS
AND TRENDS
The Utilization Review Unit is performing reviews of MDS 3.0 assessments in FY 2016.
- Previous reviews were conducted in FY 2014 and 2015.
- Average error rates for reviews in FY 2014 and 2015
were 5.4% and 4.87%, respectively.
- Nursing facility error rates ranged from 0% to 34.74%.
Page 3
FY 2016 WORK PLAN
The Work Plan for the number
- f nursing facility reviews is
based on availability of resources, historical outcomes, and other factors such as legislative mandates. *
- FY 2016 plan is to review 235
nursing facilities in Texas.
- 102 facilities have been
reviewed as of the end of February.
*Additional information is available on the IG Internet site (https://oig.hhsc.texas.gov/).
FY 2016 Work Plan Progress
Page 4
NURSING FACILITY ERROR TRENDS
56 36 33 29 15 14 13 11 5 4
FY 2015 Error Trends (Listed from high to low.)
Unsigned Forms Lack of, incomplete, or conflicting documentation Missing forms, records, and/or LTCMI Signatures don't match LTCMI No documented training/training out of date Medical records not systematically organized or readily accessible BIM/RMI not within ARD/look-back period Restorative Nursing - lack of plans, goals not measureable, missing documentation Altered documentation No M.D. visit or visit outside of ARD, or no diagnosis
Page 5
NURSING FACILITY ERROR TRENDS
32 18 16 11 5 5 4 4 3 3
FY 2016 Error Trends (Listed from high to low.)
Lack of, incomplete, or conflicting documentation Signatures don't match LTCMI Unsigned Forms BIM/RMI not within ARD/look-back period No documented training/training out of date Restorative Nursing - lack of plans, goals not measureable, missing documentation, claims 7 days after ARD Missing forms, records, and/or LTCMI ST/PT/OT Utilization/Incorrect dates of therapy Medical records not systematically organized or readily accessible Orders counted incorrectly
Page 6
FY 2016 QUARTER 1 REVIEWS AND
DUE PROCESS
285 545 530 102 111 116
35.8% 20.4% 21.9% 100 200 300 400 500 600
- Sep. 2015
- Oct. 2015
- Nov. 2015
% Forms Reviewed with RUG Changes
Forms RUG Changes
Page 7
FY 2016 QUARTER 1 REVIEWS AND
DUE PROCESS
102 111 116 19 44 30
18.6% 39.6% 25.9% 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
- Sep. 2015
- Oct. 2015
- Nov. 2015
% RUG Changes Requested for Reconsideration
RUG Changes Requests for Reconsideration
Page 8
FY 2016 QUARTER 1 REVIEWS AND
DUE PROCESS
19 44 30 12 42 24
63.2% 95.5% 80.0% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
- Sep. 2015
- Oct. 2015
- Nov. 2015
% of Onsite Review Decisions Upheld at Reconsideration
Reconsidered Forms Decisions Upheld
Page 9
FY 2016 QUARTER 1 REVIEWS AND
DUE PROCESS
2 1 1 2 3
- Sep. 2015
- Oct. 2015
- Nov. 2015
# Cases With Onsite Decisions Upheld at Reconsideration and Requesting Appeal
Page 10