NZ Faade Design Current NZ Paradigm (Synopsis and Critique) Building - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nz fa ade design
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NZ Faade Design Current NZ Paradigm (Synopsis and Critique) Building - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NZ Faade Design Current NZ Paradigm (Synopsis and Critique) Building Enclosure Council Forum June 2017 Introduction Karl Jones BAS, BE(hons), CPEng, MIPENZ 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | Presentation 3 Project Examples 6 Agenda 1.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Building Enclosure Council Forum – June 2017

Current NZ Paradigm (Synopsis and Critique)

NZ Façade Design

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

slide-3
SLIDE 3 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | Presentation 3

Karl Jones

BAS, BE(hons), CPEng, MIPENZ

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project Examples

6
slide-6
SLIDE 6 Mott MacDonald | Presentation Claddings Intitute 7

1. Current Paradigm (Design/Compliance) 2. Façade Consultant Role 3. Assessing/Minimising Risk 4. Conclusion

Agenda

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current Paradigm

slide-8
SLIDE 8 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 9 Building Act Building Code Compliance Documents Alternative Solutions Acceptable Solutions Verification Methods Codemark Certification?? Other Standards Other Testing Opinion

Lawct

slide-9
SLIDE 9 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 10

Objectives Functional Requirements Performance

slide-10
SLIDE 10 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 11

E2- AS1

Misappropriation

slide-11
SLIDE 11 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | Presentation title 12

E2/AS1 is not “the Building Code”

slide-12
SLIDE 12 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 14

Master Builder

slide-13
SLIDE 13 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 15

Architect Mason

slide-14
SLIDE 14 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 16

Architect

Builder

Engineer

slide-15
SLIDE 15 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 17

Architect

Main Contractor

Engineer

Sub Contractors

slide-16
SLIDE 16 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 18

Architect

Main Contractor

Structural Engineer

Sub Contractors

Mechanical Engineer

slide-17
SLIDE 17 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | NZIA Technical Series 19

Architect

Main Contractor

Façade Engineer

Sub Contractors

Mechanical Engineer

Structural Engineer

Project Manager Quantity Surveyor

Acoustic Engineer Fire Engineer Landscape Architect

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Façade Consultant Role

slide-19
SLIDE 19 Mott MacDonald | Presentation Claddings Intitute 27

WHAT IS A FAÇADE ENGINEER?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CONSULT

LATIN: CONSULTARE – to deliberate, to question

Mott MacDonald | Presentation Claddings Intitute 34
slide-21
SLIDE 21 Mott MacDonald | Presentation Claddings Intitute 44

Design

Design Process

Sequential – Naïve – Simplistic

Compliance Procurement

slide-22
SLIDE 22 Mott MacDonald | Presentation Claddings Intitute 45

Design Process

Holistic – Integrated – Pragmatic

Design Procurement Compliance

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Minimising Risk

slide-24
SLIDE 24

NZ Building Code Compliance

48
slide-25
SLIDE 25

A Risk Awareness Tool for Multi-Storey Buildings??

Limitations? 10/15/20/25 Storeys

49

Simple Non Technical Informative Not Compliance Critical Parameters?

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • 1.5-2.5kPa

Wind Pressures

  • >2.5kPa
  • <1.5kPa

Ultimate Limit State (Corner Pressures) 3s Gust 1/500 return

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Complex Plan – most similar
  • Some recesses
  • Balcony over habitable spaces

Geometric Complexity

  • Non vertical
  • Many recesses
  • Varying floor plans
  • Simple Rectangular
  • <2 recesses

Complexity in the base design

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • e.g. Stick curtainwall

Types of systems

  • e.g. Site installed rain-screen over

fibre cement

  • e.g. Fully unitised curtainwall

Key Words: Track record, engineered, redundancy, rational, responsibilities

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Types of systems

  • Prefabricated Systems
  • Engineering Responsibilities easily defined and design completed to local standards
  • Building movements accommodated by mechanisms that are comprehended by

simple rational analysis

  • No exposed sealants, no flashing tapes or foam tapes, limited use of site applied

sealant

  • Overall responsibility for design, fabrication and installation by a

contractor/subcontractor experienced with system

  • More than 10 years in service history

Types of systems – Low Risk

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Types of systems

  • Some on site, some off site fibrication
  • Engineering requires coordination by multiple parties
  • Design or certification to less familiar standards not cited in AS/NZS
  • Building movements accommodated by mechanisms that are comprehended by

more complicated rational analysis

  • Some exposed sealants in protected locations, no flashing tapes or foam tapes, site

applied sealant to very stable substrates

  • Overall responsibility for design, fabrication and installation by no more than 2

contractor/subcontractors experienced with system

  • 5-10 years in service history

Types of systems – Medium Risk

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Types of systems

  • Systems with mainly site fabrication
  • Design and/or testing to less unfamiliar standards (not codified methods)
  • Building movements accommodated by mechanisms that are comprehended by

complicated rational analysis, or unable to be rationally assessed

  • Exposed sealants in protected locations, flashing tapes or foam tapes
  • Overall responsibility for design, fabrication and installation by more than 2

contractor/subcontractors experienced with system

  • Less than 5 years in service history

Types of systems – High Risk

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • 3-4

Number of Systems

  • >5
  • 1-2

More systems = more interfaces Multiple Subcontractors (Coordination)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Six Risk Parameters

7

subcontractors

9

systems

slide-34
SLIDE 34

3

systems

Six Risk Parameters

6 2

subcontractors

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • Limited company experience
  • Some staff have personal relevant experience

Subcontractor Experience

  • No experience on similar building
  • >10 years
  • Successfully delivered many similar

Time & Relevance

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Seismic Drift 6-14mm
  • Vertical Differential 10-14mm

Building Movements

  • Seismic Drift 15-40mm
  • Vertical Differential 15-35mm
  • Seismic Drift <6mm
  • Vertical Differential <10mm

Seismic/Earthquake & Vertical Serviceability

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • Systems tested but not together
  • Project specific interfaces untested

Performance Testing

  • No testing
  • All systems tested 1 Specimen

AS/NZS4284 (Sirowet) Often non project specific (Historical) Include Seismic

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Facade System Type

Six Risk Parameters

Wind Pressure Façade Complexity Number of Systems Experience Building Movements Performance Testing

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Conclusion

slide-40
SLIDE 40 05/07/2017 Mott MacDonald | Presentation 68
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Thank you