O VERVIEW Fully-Functional Facility N Building Introduction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
o verview
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

O VERVIEW Fully-Functional Facility N Building Introduction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 22, 2022 173 likes •455 views

Sean Felton | Structural Advisor: Sustersic A MERICAN A RT M USEUM Northeast, United States AE Senior Thesis 2013 F INAL P RESENTATION O UTLINE Building Introduction Problem Background Proposed Structural System Architecture

slide-1
SLIDE 1

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

Northeast, United States

Sean Felton | Structural Advisor: Sustersic AE Senior Thesis 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FINAL PRESENTATION OUTLINE

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

Northeast, United States

slide-3
SLIDE 3

N

OVERVIEW

  • Fully-Functional Facility
  • 220,000 sq. ft.
  • 150’ tall
  • 9 Stories, Varying Floor Heights
  • May 2011 – December 2014
  • Design-Bid-Build; Single Prime Contract
  • $266,345,323 GMP

www.maps.google.com

N N

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • Building Introduction
  • Building Overview
  • Project Team
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-4
SLIDE 4

PROJECT TEAM

www.maps.google.com

N

Owner: General Contractor: Design Architect: Executive Architect: Structural Engineer: Geotechnical: Not Disclosed Turner Construction Renzo Piano Building Workshop Cooper, Robertson & Partners Robert Silman Associates URS Corporation

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

N N

  • Building Introduction
  • Building Overview
  • Project Team
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-5
SLIDE 5

PROBLEM STATEMENT

N

  • 4 Columns Exposed
  • Column 3-M.5 is Last Support
  • Exists outside Building Envelope
  • Architect Request for Removal

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Existing System
  • SE Corner Cantilever
  • Problem Statement
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-6
SLIDE 6

SOLUTION GOALS

N

  • Structural Stability without 3-M.5
  • Serviceability
  • Minimize Architectural Impact
  • Minimize Weight and Cost
  • Work within Precedence
  • Provide Enough Evidence for Decision

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-7
SLIDE 7

CURRENT LOAD PATH

  • Floor N-S
  • Truss 0.9
  • Trusses H, J, L
  • 3-M.5, PG46-2

N

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

N

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-8
SLIDE 8

PROPOSED LOAD PATH

  • Floor N-S
  • Truss 0.9
  • Trusses H, N.2
  • Truss X
  • Truss J

N

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

N

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-9
SLIDE 9

DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5S
  • No Composite Action
  • Concentric Connections
  • No Impact on Lateral

System

MODELING ASSUMPTIONS

  • Individual Models
  • Itemized Reactions
  • P-D Effects not Considered
  • Deflections Checked Separate
  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-10
SLIDE 10

TRUSS X

  • Point Loads at Panel Points
  • Level 4 Beams for Bracing
  • Truss J resists uplift

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

42’ 31’ 11’

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Overview
  • Custom Members
  • Summary
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-11
SLIDE 11

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

TRUSS X

  • Mu =

40,700 ft-k

  • Vu =

3200 k

  • Tu =

1580 k

Level 5 D = 1340 k L = 945 k S = 2 k Pu = 3200 k

42’ 31’ 11’

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Overview
  • Custom Members
  • Summary
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-12
SLIDE 12

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

TRUSS X

  • Mu =

40,700 ft-k

  • Vu =

3200 k

  • Tu =

1580 k

42’ 31’ 11’

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Overview
  • Custom Members
  • Summary
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary

Level 5 D = 1340 k L = 945 k S = 2 k Pu = 3200 k

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TRUSS X

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

PG56-1 Capacity Lb 20 ft fMn 41571 ft-k D 56 in fVn 3402 k B 24 in fTn 25245 k tf 10 in fPn 27541 k tw 2.25 in

  • Mu =

40,700 ft-k

  • Vu =

3200 k

  • Tu =

1580 k

  • Achieves 94% Efficiency

42’ 31’ 11’

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Overview
  • Custom Members
  • Summary
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary

Level 5 D = 1340 k L = 945 k S = 2 k Pu = 3200 k

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TRUSS X

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

42’ 31’ 11’

Shape Lu fMn fPn fTn 15A 25 750 2421 2295 15B 25 624 2161 1685 22 25 1714 4389 3545

D = 3392 k L = 2419 k S = 4 k PU = 7943 k 24R-1 fPn= 8272 k

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Overview
  • Custom Members
  • Summary
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-15
SLIDE 15

TRUSS X

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

42’ 31’ 11’ Pipe Do 24 in t 1.75 in Concrete f'c 15000 psi fy 150 ksi no. 11 n 16 Capacity fPn 8272 k fTn 8053 k fMn 2754 ft-k

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Overview
  • Custom Members
  • Summary
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary

D = 3392 k L = 2419 k S = 4 k PU = 7943 k 24R-1 fPn= 8272 k

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TRUSS X

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

42’ 31’ 11’

  • Multiple Custom Sections
  • PG56-1
  • PG46-3
  • 24R-1
  • W14x 68 – W14x455 – W27x539
  • Eccentricity Issues
  • Final Weight :

121.6 t

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Overview
  • Custom Members
  • Summary
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-17
SLIDE 17

TRUSS SUPPORTS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

H J L M.5 N.2 3 4 6

D = -350 k L = -252 k S = -1 k TU = -823 k W14x74 fTn= -981 k D = 429 k L = 179 k S = 2 k PU = 802 k 15-B fPn= 2161 k D = -973 k L = -179 k S = -6 k TU = -1206 k 15-B fTn= -1685 k

Shape Lu fMn fPn fTn 15A 25 750 2421 2295 15B 25 624 2161 1685 22 25 1714 4389 3545

D = -906 k L = -572 k S = -16 k TU = -2009 k 15-A fTn= 2295 k

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Foundations
  • Truss Supports
  • Caissons
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-18
SLIDE 18

TRUSS SUPPORTS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

H J L M.5 N.2 3 4 6

D = 3392 k L = 2419 k S = 4 k PU = 7943 k 24R-1 fPn= 8272 k D = 2479 k L = 1661 k S = 34 k PU = 5646 k 24R-1 fPn= 8272 k

Pipe Do 24 in t 1.75 in Concrete f'c 15000 psi fy 150 ksi no. 11 n 16 Capacity fPn 8272 k fTn 8053 k fMn 2754 ft-k

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Foundations
  • Truss Supports
  • Caissons
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-19
SLIDE 19

FOUNDATIONS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

1 2 3

D+H+F+L+S+T

H J L M.5 N.2 3 4 6 TU = -248 t (2) #1 Ta = -302 t PU = 3022 t (5) #2 Pa = 3726 t PU = 378 t (1) #1 Pa = 414 t PU = 2191 t (4) #2 Pa = 2484 t TU = -470 t (3) #2 Ta = -681 t TU = -675 t (2) #1 Ta = -302 t

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Foundations
  • Truss Supports
  • Caissons
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-20
SLIDE 20

DEFLECTIONS & SERVICEABILITY

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

DLL = 2.85 in DTL = 7.57 in

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Solution Goals
  • Load Path Comparison
  • Design Assumptions
  • Truss X
  • Foundations
  • Deflections
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
  • Cantilever

= 45’-10”

  • IBC Chapter 16
  • Live Load

= (½) x l/360 = l/180

  • Total Load

= (½) x l/240 = l/120

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ARCHITECTURE CONSIDERATIONS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • Minimize Impact of Architecture
  • Open Office Spaces
  • Panel Module Alignment
  • Architectural Envelope
  • Façade and Glazing
  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-22
SLIDE 22

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

PANEL MODULE ALIGNMENT

26’ 44’

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-23
SLIDE 23

PANEL MODULE ALIGNMENT

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-24
SLIDE 24

PANEL MODULE ALIGNMENT

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-25
SLIDE 25

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-26
SLIDE 26

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • The Owner
  • Turner Construction
  • The AE Faculty
  • Classmates
  • Family, Friends
  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary
slide-27
SLIDE 27

JURY QUESTIONS?

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

  • Building Introduction
  • Problem Background
  • Proposed Structural System
  • Architecture Considerations
  • Comparative Summary