Pilot on Thermal Enhanced SVE of Mercury in Soil and Bedrock under - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
pilot on thermal enhanced sve of mercury in soil and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pilot on Thermal Enhanced SVE of Mercury in Soil and Bedrock under - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pilot on Thermal Enhanced SVE of Mercury in Soil and Bedrock under an active Chloro-Alkali Plant Eric Bergeron (Golder Associates, Montreal, QC, Canada) Lena Torin & ke Eriksson (Golder Associates, Gothenburg, Sweden) Berndt-Olof Jorlv


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Pilot on Thermal Enhanced SVE of Mercury in Soil and Bedrock under an active Chloro-Alkali Plant

Eric Bergeron (Golder Associates, Montreal, QC, Canada) Lena Torin & Åke Eriksson (Golder Associates, Gothenburg, Sweden) Berndt-Olof Jorlöv & Ingela Frössling (INOVYN Sverige, Stenungsund, Sweden)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

March 14, 2016 2

■

Mercury based Chlor-Alkali plant started in 1969 in Stenungsund

■

Decision from the Sweden government:

■ Plant must be closed down by

December 2017

■ The mercury contamin-ation

needs to be remediated

■

Investigations show almost no contamination outside the plant building

■

Up to 1,5 ton of primarily elemental Hg could be present directly under the plant

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cross-Section of the Site

March 14, 2016 3

  • Approx. 1 500 kg Hg
  • Approx. 500 kg Hg are thought to be

present in deep fractures

Excavation of the thin fill will probably remediate less than approx. 25 % of the Hg. Low temperature heating of soil/ bedrock coupled with SVE was determined as the preferential, sustainable remediation technique for the site.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Pilot design

March 14, 2016 4

■

Collaboration between INOVYN (process engineering) and Golder Associates

■

3 heating wells (HW), triangular pattern

■ Indirect heating of stainless steel

casing by 140OC steam from plant

■ 2.5 m down, into the bedrock ■

2 extraction wells (EW)

■ EW-S: 1 m deep (sand and top highly

fractured ”bad” bedrock)

■ EW-D: 2.6 m deep (”good” bedrock) ■

2 monitoring wells (MW), ~5 m deep, 4 sampling levels (0.3 m, 1.75, 3, 5 m)

■

SVE started May 7th (baseline), heating started May 21th

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The pilot inside the Chloro-Alkali plant

March 14, 2016 5

EW-S &D MW-1 MW-2 HW-1 to 3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Results from drilling for the pilot

March 14, 2016 6

10 m ■

Water encountered 1.3 mbgs inside, but ~ 5 mbgs or more outside the plant

■

Shallow wells will be drilled next week to try to dewater the pilot zone

■

Deep bedrock → very low permeability

■

Mass balance shows within the pilot:

■ Approx. 5 kg Hg in vadose zone ■ A few mg in water in the bedrock 20 m boring

Hg in matrix (mg/ kg) Max Mean Sand 4 900 850 ”Bad” top bedrock 7.2 3.0 Bedrock 2.3 0.6

Sand Top bedrock Bedrock

MW:s EW-S

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results from the pilot

March 14, 2016 7

~20% of Hg extracted after 8 months Virtually no gas extracted from ”good” bedrock

Hg in gas Temperature

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Hg-speciation results for soil and bedrock

March 14, 2016 8

■

Speciation by Braunschweig University of Technology

■ Pyrolysis speciation for soil and bedrock ■ University developed speciation method for

water and gas (bubbled through water)

■

Not only elemental Hg in soil and bedrock

■

Almost 50% elemental Hg in sand that had Hg droplets

■

Elemental Hg has probably diffused into the ”bad” top bedrock

■

No elemental Hg in ”good” bedrock

■

Several other Hg-species present (HgCl2, HgS and/or HgO) Sand: 4900 mg/kg ”Bad” top bedrock: 7,2 mg/kg

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Hg-Speciation of Gas

March 14, 2016 9 Hgpart: Particle bound Hg; HgIIb: Dissolved organic Hg (bound to BrCl-oxidable organic compounds); HgIIa: Dissolved inorganic, reactive Hg; Hg0: Elemental Hg During = 3 months after heating started

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Extraction Rate Over Time

March 14, 2016 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Energy Requirements

March 14, 2016 11

■

Sandy layer ( ̴ 0,5 m): 178 kW.h/m3

■

Bad bedrock layer ( ̴ 0,4 m): 157 kW.h/m3

■

Gneissic Bedrock ( ̴ 3,1 m): 60 kW.h/m3

Adapted from TerraTherm and Weston 1997

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results

March 14, 2016 12

Observations:

■

Extraction rate needs to be increased significantly

■

Temperature increase of 22°C → a seven-fold increase in vapor pressure → 2.6 fold increase in extraction rate

■

Estimated treatment time : 12 years

■

Bedrock dewatering is necessary Solution:

■

↑soil temperature up to 100 oC

■

Soil temperature ↑ 50 to 100 oC → 26 fold increase of the vapor pressure

■

7.2 fold increase of the extraction rate expected

■

Estimated treatment time : 21 months

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Full-Scale

March 14, 2016 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Full-Scale

March 14, 2016 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Next steps…

March 14, 2016 15

■

Full scale detail design

■

Get a decision from the regulators on necessary remediation

■

The plant will close down during autumn 2017

■

After that process equipment (cells etc.) will be taken down and remediated

■

Drilling for full scale remediation will probably not start before the cells are away Control room

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The good collaboration with INOVYN has been key for the success of this pilot! Thanks: to INOYN! to the team! for the good teamwork!

Skall försöka hitta mer foton på

  • ss som varit

inblandade, har ni några på er?