PRE-ICANN63 POLICY OPEN HOUSE 11 OCTOBER 2018 This is a text box - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pre icann63 policy open house
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PRE-ICANN63 POLICY OPEN HOUSE 11 OCTOBER 2018 This is a text box - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welcome to Pre-ICANN62 Policy Webinar PRE-ICANN63 POLICY OPEN HOUSE 11 OCTOBER 2018 This is a text box caption to describe David Olive the photo to the left. Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support | 1 Welcome and Introduction


slide-1
SLIDE 1

| 1

Welcome to Pre-ICANN62 Policy Webinar

This is a text box caption to describe the photo to the left.

David Olive Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support

PRE-ICANN63 POLICY OPEN HOUSE

11 OCTOBER 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

| 2 | 2

Welcome and Introduction

Open House Format

¤ Interactive Format | A question and answer exchange with the Policy

Team

¤ Simultaneous Interpretation | Interpretation in Spanish ¤ Preparatory Materials | The Pre-ICANN63 Policy Report and Generic

Names Supporting Organization Policy Briefing: ICANN63 Edition

David Olive

Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support

slide-3
SLIDE 3

| 3

Multistakeholder Policy Development

Multistakeholder Policy Development

The ICANN Policy Development Support Team facilitates bottom-up, consensus-driven processes for global gTLD, ccTLD and IP address policies.

Designed by ICANN Communications | January 2017

GAC Governmental Advisory Committee | PDP Policy Development Process | SO/AC Supporting Organizations/Advisory Committees | WG Working Group

Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO)

GNSO Council, ICANN Board or an AC identifies issue. GNSO Council considers if issue will result in consensus policy. If yes, GNSO Council requests Preliminary Issue Report. Stafg publishes Preliminary Issue Report for Public Comment Period. Following Public Comment review, Final Issue Report is submitted for GNSO Council consideration. GNSO Council considers Final Issue Report and decides whether to initiate PDP. If yes, GNSO Council develops/adopts charter for PDP WG. GNSO Council calls for volunteers to form PDP WG. WG consults with Community and develops Initial Report for Public Comment Period. Afer reviews, WG submits Final Report to GNSO Council. GNSO Council reviews Final Report and considers adoption. If adopted, GNSO Council submits Final Report to ICANN Board. ICANN Board consults Community and GAC. ICANN Board votes on Final Report recommendations. VOTE BY ICANN BOARD FORM A WORKING GROUP SCOPE THE ISSUE DELIBERATE THE FINAL REPORT INITIATE THE PDP IDENTIFY THE ISSUE

GNSO Policy Development Process

1 2 3 4 5 6

gnso.icann.org Learn more about the GNSO

GNSO Council is composed of 21 members — divided into 2 houses (contracted and non-contracted parties) — who work on generic top-level domain name (gTLD) policies (e.g., .com, new gTLDs). The ccNSO (Council and members) works on global policies relating to country code top-level domain name (ccTLD) policies (e.g., .br, .uk). Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) ccNSO Policy Development Process

ccNSO Council, ICANN Board, Regional ccTLD organizations, SO/AC or at least 10 members

  • f ccNSO may request Issue

Report. ccNSO Council appoints issue manager. Issue manager determines if issue is within the scope of ccNSO. ICANN Bylaws define and limit the scope of issues. If issue is in scope and ccNSO Council approves Issue Report, PDP begins. ccNSO Council gives Public Notice and opens Public Comment Period. ccNSO Council appoints WG to develop the policy. WG issues Initial Report. WG opens Public Comment Period. WG produces Final Report. ccNSO Council requests GAC input. DEVELOP POLICY VOTE BY ICANN BOARD INITIATE THE PDP VOTE BY ccNSO (TWO STAGES) REQUEST AN ISSUE REPORT

1 2 3

Stage 1. ccNSO Council deliberates Final Report and if adopted, makes recommendation to its members. Stage 2. If members approve, ccNSO Council submits Final Report to ICANN Board. ICANN Board votes on Final Report recommendations, but national laws remain paramount.

4 5 6

ccnso.icann.org Learn more about the ccNSO

SCOPE THE ISSUE

FINAL REPORT

Address Supporting Organization (ASO) ASO Address Council (AC) is composed of 15 volunteers — 3 from each

  • f the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs)* — who work on global

Internet Protocol (IP) Address Policy. ASO Global Policy Development Process

Any individual may submit global policy proposal to ASO AC or RIR. RIR PDP generates global policy proposal. ICANN Board may also request global policy proposal. Five RIRs review global policy proposal. Five RIRs must approve identical global policy proposal. Five RIRs submit approved global policy proposal to ASO AC for review. ASO AC submits ratified global policy proposal to ICANN Board. ICANN Board may accept, reject, request changes or take no action. *Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) AFRINIC Africa APNIC Asia and Pacific region ARIN Canada, parts of the Caribbean and North Atlantic islands, and the U.S. LACNIC Latin America and parts of the Caribbean RIPE NCC Europe, the Middle East and parts of Central Asia REVIEW BY ICANN BOARD DETERMINE REQUIREMENTS REVIEW BY RIRs AND ASO AC IDENTIFY THE ISSUE

1 2 3 4

aso.icann.org Learn more about the ASO

ASO AC appoints Policy Proposal Facilitator Team (PPFT). ASO AC or PPFT determine if global policy proposal requires specific IANA functions actions or outcomes. ASO AC oversees global PDP.

2016 | Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial

slide-4
SLIDE 4

| 4

Multistakeholder Advice Development

slide-5
SLIDE 5

| 5 | 5

Cross-Community and High Interest Sessions at ICANN63

  • General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
  • Expedited policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary

Specification for generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) Registration Data

  • Innovation in Top-Level Domains
slide-6
SLIDE 6

| 6 | 6

Supporting Organizations & Advisory Committees (SO/AC) Updates

slide-7
SLIDE 7

| 7 | 7

Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) Joke Braeken

ccNSO Policy Advisor

  • Policy Development Process (PDP) on the Retirement of Country Code

Top Level Domains (ccTLDs)

  • Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) Policy Review
  • Progress made by the ccNSO Study Group on the use of emoji as

second level domains

  • Customer Standing Committee (CSC) Effectiveness Review
slide-8
SLIDE 8

| 8 | 8

Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) Joke Braeken

ccNSO Policy Advisor

PDP on Retirement of ccTLDs

  • Completed to date:
  • analyses of cases to date (significant change of name of country,

dissolution of country/territory)

  • Glossary/terminology
  • Under discussion, to be continued at ICANN63. Core elements for policy:
  • Applicability to all ccTLDs non-ccNSO members: ultimately ccTLD

needs to be removed,

  • Time when needs to be removed from DNS rootzone
  • How to remove, the road to removal
  • Oversight of process
  • Next steps: stress test of recommended policy
slide-9
SLIDE 9

| 9 | 9

Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Marika Konings

Vice President, Policy Development for the GNSO

slide-10
SLIDE 10

| 10 | 10

Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO)

Significant time for PDP F2F WG meetings:

  • EPDP on Temporary

Specification

  • New gTLDs Subsequent

Procedures

  • Review of Rights

Protection Mechanisms in all gTLDs

Bilateral meetings with the ICANN Board, ccNSO and Governmental Advisory Committee GNSO Sunday Sessions:

  • PDP 3.0
  • Update on new approach

for fellowship program

  • Interview with GNSO

Chair Candidates

  • Internet Governance

Engagement Group

GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Meetings GNSO Council Meeting:

  • Curative Rights Protections

for IGO/INGOs PDP

  • GNSO Council Liaison to

the GAC

  • GNSO Chair Elections
  • Termination of Next

Generation RDS PDP WG

GNSO Wrap-up Session

ICANN63 Highlights

slide-11
SLIDE 11

| 11

EPDP on Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data

On 17 May 2018, the ICANN Board approved the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data to allow contracted parties to comply with existing ICANN contractual requirements while also complying with the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The adoption of the temporary specification triggered the requirement for the GNSO to complete a consensus policy development process on the temporary specification within a

  • ne year period. An EPDP was

initiated on 19 July 2018

Overview

Extensive time has been carved out at ICANN63 to allow the EPDP Team to continue its deliberations as well as present its draft recommendations to the community:

  • Full day EPDP Team meeting on Saturday
  • EPDP Team sessions (90 minutes each) on Sunday,

Wednesday and Thursday

  • High Interest Topic session on Monday from 15.15 – 16.45

What to expect at ICANN63

The scope of the EPDP Team’s efforts includes confirming, or not, the Temporary Specification by 25 May 2019. Additionally, the scope includes discussion of a standardized access model to nonpublic registration data; however, these discussions will occur only after the EPDP Team has comprehensively answered a series of “gating questions”, which are specified in the charter.

EPDP Team’s Goal

slide-12
SLIDE 12

| 12 | 12

Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Emily Barabas

Policy Manager

slide-13
SLIDE 13

| 13

PDP on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP (SubPro) was initiated in December of 2015 and is tasked with considering the 2012 round of the New gTLD Program to determine how to improve, refine, or develop new policy recommendations for new gTLDs, taking into account existing new gTLD policy recommendations from the GNSO’s 2007 Final Report on the Introduction of New gTLDs.

Overview

The SubPro PDP was allocated a full day to meet on Saturday.

  • From 09:00-13:15, Work Track 5 (WT5), dedicated to the

topic of geographic names at the top-level, will meet to discuss open topics and its draft Initial Report

  • From 13:30-18:30, the full Working Group will meet to

discuss a supplemental report and kick off sub groups charged with reviewing public comment on its Initial Report.

What to expect at ICANN63

The SubPro PDP will be looking to make progress on a number of areas and looks forward to input from the wider community. The SubPro PDP is focusing on three major areas:

  • Beginning review of feedback on its Initial Report
  • Receiving feedback on its supplemental report
  • Making progress towards publishing the WT5 Initial

Report after ICANN63.

SubPro’s Goals

slide-14
SLIDE 14

| 14 | 14

Address Supporting Organization (ASO) Carlos Reyes

Strategic Policy Planning Director

  • Address Supporting Organization (ASO) Organizational Review Update
  • Regional Internet Registry Policy Development Activities
slide-15
SLIDE 15

| 15 | 15

At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and At-Large Community

Heidi Ullrich

Vice President, Policy Development and At-Large Relations

  • The 15 Member At-Large Advisory Committee represents the best interests
  • f Individual Internet Users. At-Large consists of over 230 At-Large

Structures and over 90 individuals.

  • Change in ALAC Leadership at ICANN63 – Maureen Hilyard will become

ALAC Chair as Alan Greenberg steps down after four years.

  • At-Large at ICANN63 - At-Large will have 24 sessions during ICANN63 with

a focus on two main projects and two primary policy issues.

  • At-Large Review Implementation – The At-Large Review Implementation

WG will continue to make progress on the 16 issues it is addressing including their policy advice process, outreach and engagement, and communications.

  • At-Large Summit (ATLAS) III – Plans for a third At-Large Summit will be

discussed during ICANN63. ATLAS III will be a smaller meeting focused on the At-Large Review Implementation taking place at ICANN66.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

| 16 | 16

At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and At-Large Community

Evin Erdoğdu

Policy Development Senior Coordinator

Silvia Vivanco

At-Large Regional Affairs Senior Manager

  • Policy Highlights at ICANN63
  • General Data Protection Regulation
  • Generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) Subsequent Procedures
  • Policy Highlights since ICANN 62
  • Regional At-Large Organization Activities at ICANN63
  • EURALO virtual General Assembly
  • AFRALO-AFRICANN meeting
  • Regional Leadership Activities to focus on key policy topics and
  • utreach and engagement activities
slide-17
SLIDE 17

| 17 | 17

Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)

Robert Hoggarth

Vice President, Policy Development and GAC Relations

  • High Level Government Meeting
  • GDPR (GNSO EPDP and Unified Access Model)
  • 2 Character Country Codes at the Second Level
  • Geographic Names (New gTLD Sub. Pro. PDP WT5)
  • CCWG - Work Stream 2 Accountability
  • IGO Curative Rights Protections
  • Traditional Priorities:
  • Direct Discussions with ICANN Board, ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO, Nominating

Committee, PTI

  • GAC Communiqué

Barcelona Hot Topics For GAC:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

| 18 | 18

Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)

High Level Government Meeting Highlights – Monday 22 October

  • Hosted approximately once every two years by a GAC Member in conjunction with

an ICANN public meeting and in addition to the usual GAC meeting.

  • Concept grew out of recommendations made by previous Accountability and

Transparency Review Teams (ATRT1 and ATRT2)(reaffirming roles & clearer understanding)

  • Barcelona is the 4th HLGM
  • Four Topic sessions:
  • The Role of and Opportunities For Governments in ICANN – Post IANA

Transition

  • Thematic Challenges in the IG Ecosystem – Cybercrime, Data Protection and

Privacy

  • The Internet Technological Evolution and the Role of ICANN
  • Global Digital Agenda and Internet Policies
  • Participation From ITU Secretary General (Lunch Address To Delegation Leaders)
  • Post-Meeting Reception (Delegations with Board and SO-AC Chairs)
  • Additional GDPR Info session for government attendees
  • Seventy-one HLGM delegations have already RSVP’d for the meeting
slide-19
SLIDE 19

| 19 | 19

Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC)

Carlos Reyes

Strategic Policy Planning Director

  • RSSAC040: Recommendations on Anonymization Processes for Source

Internet Protocol (IP) Addresses Submitted for Future Analysis

  • RSSAC039: RSSAC Statement Regarding ICANN`s Updated Key

Signing Key (KSK) Rollover Plan

  • RSSAC Organizational Review Update
slide-20
SLIDE 20

| 20 | 20

Root Zone Evolution Review Committee (RZERC)

Steve Sheng

Senior Director, Policy Development Support and Team Lead in Support of RSSAC and SSAC

  • RZERC001: Feedback on the Updated Plan for Continuing the Root Key

Signing Key (KSK) Rollover

slide-21
SLIDE 21

| 21 | 21

Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC)

  • SAC102: Comment on the Updated Plan for Continuing the Root Key

Signing Key (KSK) Rollover

  • Update on Name Collision Analysis Project
  • SSAC Organizational Review Update

Andrew McConachie

Technical & Policy Manager

slide-22
SLIDE 22

| 22

Q & A

Questions and Answers

Adobe Connect room microphones have now been

  • enabled. To activate your microphone, please click
  • n the microphone icon at the top of the toolbar

and follow the instructions. Please remember to MUTE your microphone when not speaking.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

| 23

Questions received through the registration form 1

¤ What kind of support/background/profiles do the different PDP`s

need? How can we achieve more PDP participation & engagement by newcomers/fellows? How much participation does the LAC region have on PDP? https://www.icann.org/news/multimedia/3335 http://icannlac.org/EN/progress

¤ How long does a policy take before it is implemented and also what

processes does it go through? https://www.icann.org/news/multimedia/3335

¤ With so few words as possible, try to explain the policy in general, and

how it will inflect the internet and affect users? Please give some

  • examples. https://www.icann.org/policy

¤ Current state of EPDP for GDPR? Please see slide 11.

https://community.icann.org/x/IYEpBQ

slide-24
SLIDE 24

| 24

Questions received through the registration form 2

¤ What is the role of GDPR to Root Zone DNSSec KSK?

There is no role or impact of GDPR to DNSSec KSK.

¤ How will emoji be used as second level domains and what are

applications? When do ccTLDs reach retirement? What are the advantages of the ‘next generation RDS’ over the legacy WHOIS? Please see slide 11 and slide 8. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/conrad-to-forrest- et-al-03oct18-en.pdf https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-095-en.pdf

¤ Trabajo en materia de políticas sobre el retiro de los dominios de alto

nivel con código de país (ccTLD) - Work on policy regarding the removal of high level domains with country code (ccTLD) Please see slide 8.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

| 25

Engage with ICANN Policy Development Support

Contact us at policy-staff@icann.org

Thank You!

Follow us on Twitter: @ICANN @ccNSO @ICANN_GNSO @ICANNAtLarge

Recordings & slides from this Open House will be posted on the Policy Presentations Space

  • n the ICANN website – see link in Adobe

Connect Chat Pod and below: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/present ations-2012-08-27-en