Rethinking Strategy: Art Lykke and the Development of the Ends, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rethinking strategy art lykke and the development of the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Rethinking Strategy: Art Lykke and the Development of the Ends, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

STRATCOM Speaker Series Rethinking Strategy: Art Lykke and the Development of the Ends, Ways, Means Model of Strategy Andrew C. Webb, Major, U.S. Army Art of War Scholar, U.S. Army Command & General Staff College Ph.D. Student,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

STRATCOM Speaker Series

Rethinking Strategy: Art Lykke and the Development of the “Ends, Ways, Means” Model of Strategy

Andrew C. Webb, Major, U.S. Army

Art of War Scholar, U.S. Army Command & General Staff College Ph.D. Student, Strategic Studies, Johns Hopkins University SAIS

Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Model Chapter 3 Teaching Strategy Chapter 4 Driving Change Chapter 5 Conclusions 05/31/2019 1 of 9

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Key Takeaways

  • The “Ends, Ways, Means” model of strategy is the product of a single

Professor at the U.S. Army War College, Colonel Arthur F. Lykke, Jr.

  • The “Ends, Ways, Means” model did not gain immediate acceptance due

to concerns over Lykke’s expertise and the model’s assumptions, logic, and evidence.

  • The model eventually emerged as the dominate framework in the U.S.

Army due to Lykke’s longevity at the U.S. Army War College, his editorial control of key course texts, and circumstances unique to the 1980s.

  • The “Ends, Ways, Means” model is inadequate for most strategy making

today.

05/31/2019 2 of 9

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Research Questions

Research Questions: 1. Who is Arthur F. Lykke, Jr. and why did he develop the “Ends, Ways, Means” model of strategy? 2. How did Lykke articulate the model and how did his contemporaries react to his new model? 3. How did Lykke’s position at the U.S. Army War College contribute to the development and eventual acceptance of the “Ends, Ways, Means” model? 4. What external influences in the global security environment, changes within the U.S. Army, and U.S. civilian policymaker policy guidance influenced the acceptance of Lykke’s “Ends, Ways, Means” model during the 1980s? 5. Is “Ends, Ways, Means” a useful model for the strategy-making needs of the U.S. Army and U.S. military today?

Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Model Chapter 3 Teaching Strategy Chapter 4 Driving Change Chapter 5 Conclusions 05/31/2019 3 of 9

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Chapter 1: Introduction

  • Purpose
  • Research Method
  • Assumptions
  • Definitions
  • Scope
  • Limitations
  • Significance

05/31/2019 4 of 9 Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Model Chapter 3 Teaching Strategy Chapter 4 Driving Change Chapter 5 Conclusions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Chapter 2: Ends, Ways, Means: The Development of the Lykke Model

05/31/2019 5 of 9

  • Who is Arthur F. Lykke, Jr.?
  • Lykke’s Senate Testimony
  • Assumptions, Logic, Evidence
  • Reaction from fellow panelists
  • Lykke’s silence during the discussion
  • “Defining Military Strategy”
  • Key Conclusions

Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Model Chapter 3 Teaching Strategy Chapter 4 Driving Change Chapter 5 Conclusions

Image 1: The Strategy Stool Image 2: Military Review, May 1989

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Chapter 3: Teaching Strategy at Carlisle in the 1980s

  • The 1982 Edition of Military Strategy
  • Wide range of perspectives, diverse authors, contradictory viewpoints
  • Lykke’s model as a model, not the model
  • Breadth and depth of the dimensions of strategy
  • The 1989 Edition of Military Strategy
  • Narrow Anglo-American, military perspective on strategy
  • Prominence of Lykke and “Ends, Ways, Means”
  • Reduction in the dimensions of strategy

05/31/2019 6 of 9 Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Model Chapter 3 Teaching Strategy Chapter 4 Driving Change Chapter 5 Conclusions

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Chapter 4: Driving Change: From a Hollow Army to Desert Storm

  • The Global Security Environment of the 1980s
  • The Middle East
  • Tensions with the Soviet Union
  • The U.S. Army of the Era
  • The Shadow of Vietnam
  • The transformation of the Army, especially doctrine
  • The Weinberger Doctrine

Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Model Chapter 3 Teaching Strategy Chapter 4 Driving Change Chapter 5 Conclusions 05/31/2019 7 of 9

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Chapter 5: Conclusions

  • Lykke’s “Ends, Ways, Means” model of strategy emerged as the

dominate strategy model within the U.S. Army in the 1980s despite three major weaknesses:

  • 1. Separation of military strategy from national strategy
  • 2. Problems of formulation

a. Two different formulas, neither logical b. Circular definition

  • 3. Questionable use of quotations from strategists
  • So what?
  • Importance of doctrine
  • A different world

Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 The Model Chapter 3 Teaching Strategy Chapter 4 Driving Change Chapter 5 Conclusions 05/31/2019 8 of 9

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Questions and Discussion

05/31/2019 9 of 9