Review of burial and cremation law Image thanks to Christchurch - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Review of burial and cremation law Image thanks to Christchurch City Council Scope of review Places and manner of burial Crematoria Funeral sector Decision making after death Disputes Death certification Where were at
Review of burial and cremation law Image thanks to Christchurch City Council
Scope of review • Places and manner of burial • Crematoria • Funeral sector • Decision making after death • Disputes • Death certification
Where we’re at • First issues paper released 23 May 2011 – death certification • Second issues paper released 4 October 2013 – burial, cremation, funeral sector, decision making – Currently undertaking public consultation – Submissions due 20 December 2013 – Report to be released next year
Major issues in this review • Management of places of burial • Consumer protection in the funeral sector • Decision making after death • Public health and expectations about appropriate handling of deceased bodies
Cemeteries • Status quo – Provided by local authorities – Some pre-1900 cemeteries managed by trustees – Religious groups can apply to set up denominational burial grounds – No ability for non-religious organisation to establish new cemeteries
Cemeteries • Preliminary conclusions – Overly restrictive – insufficient weight on the various human rights engaged at the time of death – new framework required for establishing and managing cemeteries
Cremation • Status quo – Mix of public and private provision – Approval from Ministry of Health required for new crematoria – overlap with resource consenting process – Lack of national consistency in conditions of operation – On going monitoring focuses on environmental issues
Cremation • Preliminary conclusions – Current regulations outdated and do not effectively manage risks – Inadequate public consultation – Lack of industry wide standards & quality assurance systems – Absence of monitoring (other than environmental)
Cemeteries & Crematoria • Key preliminary proposals – devolving decision-making power and regulatory oversight for cemeteries and crematoria from central government to local authorities – replacing the land management scheme set out in the Act with the Resource Management framework. – developing a National Environmental Standard to ensure a consistent approach to the establishment, management and long-term maintenance of all cemeteries in New Zealand.
• opening up the cemetery sector to independent providers including those wishing to develop alternative burial options such as eco-burial grounds; • providing greater scope for individuals to be buried on private land; • providing for greater diversity and burial choice in public cemeteries; • introducing minimum maintenance standards for public cemeteries;
• introducing a new legal requirement that all crematoria have a licensed operator or supervisor; • introducing expanded regulatory controls for the operation of crematoria and their handling of human ashes; • transferring responsibility for authorising crematoria from central government to local authorities under the Resource Management Act; and • introducing a requirement that all resource consent applications for new crematoria be publicly notified so that any potential adverse effects on amenity values can be taken into account.
Funeral sector • Status quo – Very permissive regulatory framework • No minimum standards for those operating as funeral directors or embalmers • Inspections of premises by local authorities, but standards out of date – Voluntary industry bodies cover 60% of funeral directors
Funeral sector • Proposals – Funeral service providers must be licensed by local authorities • Interview requirement and assessment of premises • Periodic renewal – Service providers must proactively disclose qualifications, industry affiliation, and pricing
Decisions after death • Status quo – Executor has legal right to make decisions about burial/cremation and funeral arrangements – In practice, decisions usually made by family. – High Court has jurisdiction to resolve disputes – disputes are common, court cases are not – Lack of clarity about other decisions, e.g. ashes – Disinterment requires Ministry of Health approval
Decisions after death • Proposals – New statutory framework for decision making • Seeking public views on weighting of different factors • Family Court to have jurisdiction
Decisions after death • Proposals – Clearer statutory defaults and contractual rights regarding ashes, memorialisation, and additional interments – New framework for disinterment • Health issues addressed locally rather than nationally? Family consensus required / Family Court to determine disputes
Feedback wanted! • Reforms have implications for public health • Submissions are now open – close 20 December • We want to hear your views!
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.