Risk Factors in African-American Women Michele L. Cote, PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

risk factors in african american women
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Risk Factors in African-American Women Michele L. Cote, PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Risk Factors in African-American Women Michele L. Cote, PhD Associate Professor W Wayne State University St t U i it Age Adjusted Incidence and Mortality Rates for all Endometrial Cancers 2000-2010 by Race/Ethnicity for SEER 18


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Risk Factors in African-American Women

Michele L. Cote, PhD Associate Professor W St t U i it Wayne State University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Age Adjusted Incidence and Mortality Rates for all Endometrial Cancers 2000-2010 by Race/Ethnicity for SEER 18

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2012 Sub (2000-2010) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2011 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2013, based on the November 2012 submission.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Endometrial Cancer—large survival disparity disparity

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Age Adjusted Incidence and Mortality Rates for Endometrioid and Serous Endometrial Cancer 2000-2010 by Race/Ethnicity for SEER 18

Endometrioid Serous Endometrioid Serous

25 Incidence Mortality 5 Incidence Mortality 15 20 te per 100,000 y 3 4 te per 100,000 y 10 Age Adjusted Rat 2 Age Adjusted Rat 5 NHW NHB Hispanic Asian A 1 NHW NHB Hispanic Asian A p p Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2012 Sub (2000-2010) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2011 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2013, based on the November 2012 submission.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Age Adjusted Incidence Rates for Endometrioid and Serous Endometrial Cancer, 2000-2010 by , y race/ethnicity and year, SEER 18

Endometrioid Serous Endometrioid Serous

APC =0.4 APC = 3.1* APC 1 9* APC = 1.3* APC = 1.9* APC 10 3* APC = 1.9* APC = 10.3* APC = 2.6* APC = 3.1 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2012 Sub (2000-2010) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2011 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2013, based on the November 2012 submission.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Relative 5-year Survival Rates for Endometrioid and Serous Endometrial Cancer by Race/Ethnicity y / y 2000-2005, SEER 18

Endometrioid Serous Endometrioid Serous

90% 100%

NHW NHB

90% 100%

NHW NHB

60% 70% 80% urvival

NHB Hispanic Asian

60% 70% 80% urvival

NHB Hispanic Asian

30% 40% 50% Relative Su 30% 40% 50% Relative Su 0% 10% 20% Local Regional Distant 0% 10% 20% Local Regional Distant g g Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2012 Sub (2000-2010) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2011 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2013, based on the November 2012 submission.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Hysterectomy common in US women

Jamison PM et al. 2013. “Trends in endometrial cancer incidence by race and histology with a correction for the prevalence of hysterectomy, SEER 1992 to 2008”. Cancer Epi Biomarkers and Prev; 22(2) pgs 233-241

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Correcting for hysterectomy, ages 50+

  • Without correction for hysterectomy rates
  • Without correction for hysterectomy, rates

in black women are increasing and nearly equal to white women

  • With correction, rates in black women are

increasing and exceed the rate in white women women

Jamison PM et al. 2013

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Background Summary

  • Endometrial cancer incidence is increasing among

African Americans

  • Increases seen for both endometrioid and serous sub-

Increases seen for both endometrioid and serous sub types

  • The survival disparity remains unchanged

Question:

  • The survival disparity remains unchanged

Do endometrial cancer risk factors or effect sizes differ between black and white women? between black and white women?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Studies complied through E2C2

Pooled analysis: 11 studies Black women ncases=516/ncontrols=1 495 Black women ncases 516/ncontrols 1,495 White women: ncases=5,693/ncontrols=13,604 Cohort: Black Cases AARP 81 AARP 81 California Teachers Study 12 Multiethnic Cohort Study 128 New York University Women’s Health Study 23 y y PLCO 23 Southern Community Cohort Study 32 Women’s Health Initiative Study 53 Case-control: Bay Area Women’s Health Study 44 Estrogen, Diet, Genetics and Endometrial Cancer Study 39 g y Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Study 14 Women’s Insight and Shared Experience Study 67

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Associations for common risk factors i il f hit d bl k similar for white and black women

*statistically significant at p<0.05

Models adjusted for: age, BMI, smoking status, OC use, diabetes, age at menarche, parity

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Other risk factors

Oral Contraceptives White Black

0 1 f f 0<1 year ref ref 1-4 years 1.03 (0.88, 1.20) 0.59 (0.37, 0.97) 5-9 years 0.95 (0.80, 1.13) 0.74 (0.42, 1.29) 10+ years 0.69 (0.58, 0.83) 0.49 (0.27, 0.88) y ( , ) ( , ) p-trend <0.001 0.04

Hypertension White Black

No ref ref Yes 0.88 (0.66, 1.17) 0.99 (0.90, 1.08)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Limitations

  • Even with 11 large studies, power was limited when

g , p examining risk in black women unable to examine histological subtypes by race

  • Data harmonization, particularly of hormone use, is

challenging g g could not assess sequential versus continuous HT

  • Most common variables between studies were those

for estrogen-dependent cancers already fairly well characterized already fairly well-characterized

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Could survival differences be due to underlying tumor biology? underlying tumor biology?

Study: 150 tumors from white (n=66) and African American (n=84) women

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Cote ML, et al. (2012) Int J Gyn Cancer, 22(8)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Conclusions

  • Incidence of endometrial cancer is increasing among black women in

the U.S. the U.S.

  • Survivorship hasn’t improved dramatically over the last 3 decades—

and still worse for black women at every stage

  • The effect sizes for established endometrial cancer risk factors are

similar among black and white women We lack the power to adequately assess risk among black women

  • We lack the power to adequately assess risk among black women,

need to consider histological type

  • Elucidating molecular differences may provide clues to treatment,

survival

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank you!

Special thanks to Julie Ruterbusch for the current SEER analyses