THE CROWN LANDS REVIEW: A MISSED OPPORTUNITY? Greens MP David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
THE CROWN LANDS REVIEW: A MISSED OPPORTUNITY? Greens MP David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
THE CROWN LANDS REVIEW: A MISSED OPPORTUNITY? Greens MP David Shoebridge 1. Introduce yourself 2. Let us know who the Questions? Traditional Owners are of the land youre on today 3. Keep it brief Background Draft State Strategic Plan
Questions?
1. Introduce yourself 2. Let us know who the Traditional Owners are of the land you’re on today 3. Keep it brief
Background
Draft State Strategic Plan for Crown land
Background
- Plan is required to be prepared under
the Crown Land Management Act 2016
- Joint Ministerial responsibility
between Rob Stokes for metro and Melinda Pavey for regional Crown Lands
Detail
- Submissions due by Midnight 20
August 2020
- Online submission
form/downloadable form (we will discuss this later)
- cl.enquiries@crownland.nsw.gov.au
Risks from the current plan
- Does not deal with fundamental issues around custodianship for First
Nations people and biodiversity protections
- Excessive corporate focus likely to lead to privatisation and exploitation of
land
- Misses opportunities for job creation through First Nations knowledge and
custodianship and through care for country
- Mechanisms for the changes are generally undefined or unclear (the
enabling initiatives do not live up to the objectives)
Risks from the current plan (cont)
- Absence of financial allocations for restoration and heritage protection
means they won’t happen
- The “enablers” aren’t actually sufficient to achieve priorities or the desired
- utcomes
- Risks for regions is economics at any cost
- Risks for city is recreation at any cost
- Lack of environmental outcomes (especially measurable ones)
Principles that should guide the strategy
- First Nations people as
- wners/co-managers of Crown Land
- Should prevent disposal of ANY
Crown Land until Treaty
- Environmental values must be a key
priority and not subjugated to economic goals
- Crown Lands should not be privatised
- r sold
This means:
- Investment in Crown Land so that
land does not become degraded
- Crown Land is our land and must
not be privatised or excessively commercialised
- Ensure costs are not unfairly
shifted to local councils or Aboriginal Land Councils
First Nations custodianship
- Plan only talks about Land Claims
and how to respond to these, this is insufficient
- Co-management must be on the
table
- Prioritise title claims and deal with
the backlog of claims (38,000)
- Revegetation and First Nations
communities
- Plan must include water rights for
cultural flows - take rules should be consistent
- Need to ensure are not given
degraded assets or liabilities
- Access to cultural experiences a key
priority
Environmental Values
- Plan must include biodiversity
including specific targets
- Connectivity between green
spaces is essential and crown land is critical for this
- Need more focus on urban
greening and green space for community access - passive and active spaces
- Land clearing is the elephant in the
room and must be addressed
- Western Lands are being
significantly degraded under the lease system which is an effective sale of these lands
Concerns with form response provided
- Limited nature of the form
submission only allows approval or disapproval of current aims
- 4 consultation sessions have
been conducted which raised significant concerns especially about environmental protection and Aboriginal ownership
- “Do you believe there are any
- ther priorities” important to
include 1. Aboriginal custodianship 2. Ecological values Must be the key priorities and other priorities must be consistent with these
Questions?
1. Introduce yourself 2. Let us know who the Traditional Owners are of the land you’re on today 3. Keep it brief