The Debilitating Effects of Recently Weakened U.S. Livestock Disease - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the debilitating effects of recently weakened u s
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Debilitating Effects of Recently Weakened U.S. Livestock Disease - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Debilitating Effects of Recently Weakened U.S. Livestock Disease Protections: A Call for Immediate Reform Presented by Bill Bullard, CEO, R-CALF USA December 09, 2010 1 The United States Is the Largest Beef Producer and Largest Beef


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

The Debilitating Effects of Recently Weakened U.S. Livestock Disease Protections: A Call for Immediate Reform

Presented by Bill Bullard, CEO, R-CALF USA December 09, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

The United States Is the Largest Beef Producer and Largest Beef Consumer in the World

Our Reputation of Producing the Healthiest Cattle and the Safest, Most Wholesome Beef Is Contingent on Maintaining the Highest Possible Health and Safety Standards, But . . .

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

The United States Has Weaker BSE Import Standards for Beef than Most Major Beef Importing Countries

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

U.S. Has Weak BSE Import Standards for Beef

R-CALF USA

BSE STANDARDS OF MAJOR BEEF IMPORTING COUNTRIES Country Age Restriction Specified Risk Material (SRM) Definition Commodity Restrictions Japan 20 months

  • r younger

Head (excluding tongue and cheek meat), palatine and lingual tonsils, spinal cord and dura matter, distal ileum, vertebral column, and dorsal root ganglia. No ground beef, processed beef, head meat, finely textured beef, or mechanically separated meat. Korea Under 30 months Skull, brain, eyes, distal ileum, tonsils, spinal cord, vertebral column. Cattle must be born and raised in the United States, or imported from a country deemed eligible by the Korean government to export beef or beef products to Korea, or raised in the United States for at least 100 days. Traceback records must be maintained for at least 2 years. No mechanically recovered meat or mechanically separated meat. Mexico Under 30 months Skull, brain, eyes, tonsils, spinal cord, and small intestine. No ground meat, feet, sweetbreads, weasand meat, or head meat. Hong Kong Under 30 months Skull (including brain, eyes and trigeminal ganglia), tonsils, spinal cord, dorsal root ganglia (with the vertebral column) and intestine. No ground beef. No bone-in beef, edible offal,

  • r beef derived from advanced meat

recovery systems. Source: USITC Publication 4033, September 2008, 4-9.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

U.S. Has Weak BSE Import Standards for Beef

BSE STANDARDS FOR ADDITIONAL TOP BEEF IMPORTING COUNTRIES Country Age Restriction Specified Risk Material (SRM) Definition Commodity Restrictions Taiwan Under 30 months If slaughtered before Nov. 1, 2009: brain, skull, eyes, trigeminal ganglia, spinal cord, vertebral column (excluding the vertebrae of the tail, the transverse processes of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, and the wings of the sacrum), dorsal root ganglia, the tonsils and the distal ileum of the small intestine. FSIS regulations apply after Nov. 1, 2009. Cattle must be born and raised in the United States, raised in the United States for at least 100 days prior to slaughter, or legally imported into the United States from a country deemed eligible by Taiwan to export deboned beef to Taiwan. Beef or beef products of cattle from Canada fed less than 100 days prior to slaughter in the United States is limited to deboned beef derived from animals less than 30 months of age. Vietnam Under 30 months Brain, skull, eyes, trigeminal ganglia, spinal cord, vertebral column (excluding the vertebrae of the tail, the transverse processes of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, and the wings of the sacrum) and dorsal root ganglia and the tonsils and distal ileum of the small intestine of any cattle regardless of age. The meat does not contain advanced recovery meat or mechanically separated meat. Russia Under 30 months Brain, spinal cord, eyes, skull, and vertebral column regardless of the age of the animal. The beef and beef byproducts must be derived from cattle raised in the United States. Ground red meat, packaged in bulk form or in the form of meat patties, is prohibited. United Arab Emirates Under 30 months Ritual: Islamic Halal Slaughter requirements apply. Singapore Under 30 months Tonsils, distal ileum, brains, eyes, spinal cord, skull and vertebral column must be cleanly removed from products shipped to Singapore without contamination of the meat. Only Fresh/frozen boneless beef derived from animals less than 30 months of age is eligible. Beef derived from cattle imported from Canada is not eligible. Source: USDA, FSIS, Index of Export Requirements for Meat and Poultry Products, undated, (accessed

  • Dec. 14, 2009).
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

The United States Has Weaker Disease Import Standards for Cattle than Many, If Not Most, Cattle Importing Countries

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

BSE Age Restrictions

COUNTRIES WITH STRICTER THAN U.S. AGE REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPORTING CANADIAN CATTLE COUNTRY AGE RESTRICTIONS ON CANADIAN CATTLE Algeria Cattle must be less than 36 months of age Barbados Cattle must be born after Dec. 31, 2003 Egypt Slaughter cattle must be less than 24 months of age European Union Cattle must be born after date of last indigenous BSE case Lebanon Cattle must be under 30 months of age Republic of Croatia Cattle must be born after date of last indigenous BSE case South Korea Cattle must be born two years after effective enforcement

  • f feed ban

Switzerland Cattle must be born after date of last indigenous BSE case Tunisia Cattle must be born after July 1, 2001 Source: Canadian Food Inspection Agency Export Program, Veterinary Health Certificates, Bovine, available at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/export/bovine/bovine.shtml

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Restrictions on Cattle Type

COUNTRIES WITH GREATER THAN U.S. RESTRICTIONS ON THE TYPE OF CATTLE IMPORTED FROM CANADA COUNTRY RESTRICTIONS ON CANADIAN CATTLE TYPE Algeria Breeding cattle only Lebanon Slaughter cattle only Mexico Breeding cattle only Republic of Serbia Breeding cattle only Russia Breeding cattle only South Korea Bulls only Tunisia Heifers and "Fattening" cattle only Ukraine Breeding cattle only Source: Canadian Food Inspection Agency Export Program, Veterinary Health Certificates, Bovine, available at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/export/bovine/bovine.shtml

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Origin Requirements

COUNTRIES WITH STRICTER THAN U.S. ORIGIN REQUIREMENTS FOR CATTLE IMPORTED FROM CANADA COUNTRY ORIGIN REQUIREMENTS Algeria Must be born and raised in Canada Barbados Must be born and raised in Canada Egypt Slaughter cattle must be born and raised in Canada Kazakhstan Must be born and raised in Canada Mexico Must be born in Canada or from the U.S. Morocco Must be born and raised in Canada Republic of Serbia Must be born and raised in Canada Russia Must be born and raised in Canada

  • St. Pierre and Miquelon

Must be born and raised in Canada Tunisia Must be raised in Canada Uzbekistan Must be born and raised in Canada Source: Canadian Food Inspection Agency Export Program, Veterinary Health Certificates, Bovine, available at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/export/bovine/bovine.shtml

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Testing Requirements for Other Diseases

COUNTRIES WITH STRICTER THAN U.S. TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR CATTLE IMPORTED FROM CANADA COUNTRY MANDATORY TESTING REQUIRED FOR TB AND BRUCELLOSIS Algeria Yes Barbados Yes Egypt Yes Jordan Yes Kazakhstan Yes Mexico Yes Morroco Yes Republic of Croatia Yes Republic of Serbia Yes Russia Yes

  • St. Pierre and

Miquelon Yes South Korea Yes Trinidad and Tobago Yes Tunisia Yes Ukraine Yes Uzbekistan Yes Source: Canadian Food Inspection Agency Export Program, Veterinary Health Certificates, Bovine, available at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/export/bovine/bovine.shtml

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

In Return for Having Among the Weakest

  • f Disease Import Standards, the U.S.

Cattle Industry Is:

  • Subject to a Scientifically Determined, Increased

Risk of Introducing BSE into the U.S. Cattle Herd, which Presents a Hazard to both Livestock and Humans.

– USDA’s risk modeling for its over-30-month rule (OTM Rule) predicts the U.S. would import between 19 and 105 BSE-infected cattle from Canada, which would subsequently produce BSE infections in 2 to 75 U.S.-born cattle over a 20-year period. (See 72 Fed. Reg., 1109, col. 2; 72 Fed. Reg., 53347, col. 1.)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

In Return for Having Among the Weakest

  • f Disease Import Standards, the U.S.

Cattle Industry Is:

  • Suffering from the Continual Reintroduction of Other

Dangerous Diseases Into the United States.

– The USDA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) reported in 2006 that 75 percent of bovine TB cases detected during the previous five years by U.S. slaughter surveillance originated in Mexico and were detected in 12 U.S. states. The OIG explained that because Mexican cattle spend many months on U.S. farms and ranches prior to slaughter, each bovine TB case is potentially spreading the disease in the United States. In addition, the OIG stated, “Until additional controls are added, APHIS cannot reasonably expect to achieve its goal and eradicate TB when it is being imported into the United States each year. (See OIG Report No. 50601-0009-Ch, September 2006, at iii,19, 20.)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

In Return for Having Among the Weakest

  • f Disease Import Standards, the U.S.

Cattle Industry Is:

  • Suffering Significant Financial Losses Resulting

from the Importation of Higher-Risk Canadian Cattle.

– USDA estimates that the cost to U.S. cattle producers, for the privilege of being exposed to a heightened risk for BSE from Canadian cattle and beef, would be over $66 million per year (or approx. $1.3 million each week), for which no compensation can be obtained from anyone. (See 72 Fed. Reg. 53,356, col. 1.)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Consumers Both Here and Abroad Know that Canada Has a Higher BSE Risk

  • The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states:

“The previously published best estimate of Canada’s BSE prevalence in 2006 using the BSurveE model was 23-fold higher than that of the United States and is the estimate of the BSE prevalence in Canada that continues to be used in the Harvard Risk Assessments’ “worst case” analyses when evaluating the risk of imported Canadian cattle causing BSE to spread among US animals.” (emphasis added). “As of February 2010, 18 BSE cases in Canadian-born cattle have been identified, 17 in Canada and 1 in the U.S. Of these 18 cases, 12 were known to have been born after the implementation

  • f the 1997 Canadian feed ban; 11 of these 12 were born after March 1, 1999.”

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/bse/ “To reduce any risk of acquiring vCJD from food, concerned travelers to Europe or other areas with indigenous cases of BSE may consider either avoiding beef and beef products altogether or selecting beef or beef products, such as solid pieces of muscle meat (rather than brains or beef products like burgers and sausages), that might have a reduced opportunity for contamination with tissues that may harbor the BSE agent.” http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/vcjd/risk_travelers.htm

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Numerous Countries that Accept U.S. Beef Continue to Ban Canadian Beef

U.S. EXPORT MARKETS CLOSED TO CANADIAN BEEF The following 13 countries accept U.S. beef exports; but, according to information provided by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, these countries continue to ban Canadian beef: Chile Colombia Dominican Republic Haiti Jamaica Jordan South Korea Kuwait Malaysia Peru Saint Lucia Singapore Ukraine Sources: USDA, FSIS, Index of Export Requirements for Meat and Poultry Products, undated, (accessed Dec. 14, 2009). Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Summary of the Situation with Foreign Markets relative to BSE as of February 17, 2009 (latest available information), available at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/meavia/man/ch11/annexre.shtml.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Incubation Periods Have Not Lengthened in Canada as In Europe, Where BSE Spread Is Thought to be Under Control

Lifespans of Known BSE-Positive Canadian-Born BSE Cases

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 9 8 5 1 9 8 6 1 9 8 7 1 9 8 8 1 9 8 9 1 9 9 1 9 9 1 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 2 1 Number of BSE Cases Case # 7 Case # 12 Case # 3 Case # 9 Case # 1 Case # 2 Case # 4 Case # 5 Case # 6 Case # 10 Case # 13 Case # 16 Case # 11 Case #15 Case # 8 Case # 14 Case # 17 Case # 18

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

In Return for Having Among the Weakest

  • f Disease Import Standards, the U.S.

Cattle Industry Is:

  • Suffering a Global Trade Deficit in the

Trade of Cattle, Beef, Beef Variety Meats and Processed Beef.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Trade with Canada and Mexico Generates a Long-Term U.S. Trade Deficit

U.S. Trade With Canada and Mexico Live Cattle, Beef, Beef Variety Meat, Processed Beef R-CALF USA, Dec. 09, 2010 HS-6 Digit

  • $2,000,000
  • $1,500,000
  • $1,000,000
  • $500,000

$0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 Value in 1000 Dollars Exports $517,942 $870,386 $1,315,186 $1,461,558 $1,686,586 $1,533,304 $1,114,310 Imports $1,796,693 $2,394,263 $2,611,919 $2,907,844 $2,843,198 $2,294,563 $2,111,213 Trade Balance

  • $1,278,751
  • $1,523,877
  • $1,296,733
  • $1,446,286
  • $1,156,612
  • $761,259
  • $996,903

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jan - Sep 2010

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Global Deficit in Trade of Cattle, Beef, Beef Variety Meat and Processed Beef

U.S. Global Trade Balance Live Cattle, Beef, Beef Variety Meat, Processed Beef R-CALF USA, Dec. 09, 2010 HS-6 Digit

  • $5,000,000
  • $4,000,000
  • $3,000,000
  • $2,000,000
  • $1,000,000

$0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 Value in 1000 Dollars Exports $648,298 $1,136,658 $1,758,309 $2,304,207 $3,208,976 $3,060,897 $2,922,034 Imports $4,232,467 $4,779,442 $4,867,587 $5,296,271 $4,957,138 $4,141,458 $3,494,590 Trade Balance

  • $3,584,169
  • $3,642,784
  • $3,109,278
  • $2,992,064
  • $1,748,162
  • $1,080,561
  • $572,556

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jan - Sep 2010

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Using Weaker U.S. Disease Import Standards to Leverage the Reopening of Export Markets Is Deplorable

  • USDA Has a Duty to Prevent the Introduction of

Dangerous Diseases Into the U.S. (see 7 U.S.C. § § 8301 (1), 8303 (a)(1)) and Performance of that Duty Is Essential to Restoring the United States’ Lost Reputation of Maintaining the Healthiest Cattle Herd in the World, which Reputation Was the U.S. Cattle Industry’s Competitive Advantage

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

The Solution Is To Address The Problem, Not The Problem’s Symptoms

  • The problem’s symptoms include loss of consumer

confidence in the health and safety of U.S. cattle and beef products, reduced consumption of U.S. beef, severe restrictions on U.S. beef exports, and depressed prices for U.S. cattle farmers and ranchers.

  • The problem is that the U.S. maintains disease import

standards that are too weak to prevent the introduction

  • f dangerous diseases, and everyone knows it.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

The Solution

  • USDA Must Restore for U.S. Livestock,

Livestock Producers, and the People of the United States Its Previously Weakened Disease Import Restrictions and Endeavor to Achieve the Highest Possible Level of Protection Against the Introduction and Spread of Animal Diseases.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Priority Action: In Descending Order of Priority

  • Immediately Reverse the OTM Rule that Allows the Importation into

the U.S. from Canada of Older Cattle, and Beef from Older Cattle, that Harbor the Highest Risk for BSE. After the OTM Rule is Reversed:

  • Require Canada, and any other country with BSE cases born after

their respective feed bans, to test all slaughtered cattle over 30 months of age (OTM) for at least one-year prior to considering the resumption OTM beef.

  • Assist U.S. beef packers in the voluntary testing for BSE.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Canada Has Significantly Reduced Its Monthly BSE Testing

Canada's Monthly BSE Testing 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Number of Cattle Tested Each Month 2008 6227 5587 5747 6713 5726 3908 2593 1966 2244 2500 2669 2928 2009 3507 3285 3592 3900 2991 2729 2294 2009 2170 2596 2719 2826 2010 3536 3195 4015 3806 3105 2905 2405 2105 2388 2371 3-Yr Ave (05-07) 5310 5325 6511 6773 5820 4531 2890 2660 3029 3337 5456 5479 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Canada Has Significantly Reduced Its Annual BSE Testing

Canada's Annual BSE Testing and Results 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 Total Cattle Tested Annually Annual Tests 3710 23550 57768 55420 58177 48808 34618 29831 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010-Oct 2 BSE 5 BSE Positives 3 BSE Positives 4 BSE Positives 1 BSE Positive 0 BSE Positives 2 BSE Positives (1 Imported to U.S.) 1 BSE Positive

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Additional Actions

  • Require all cattle imported into the U.S. from Mexico to be tested for

bovine tuberculosis (TB), directed to designated feedlots, and held in those feedlots until they are ready for slaughter.

  • Require all cattle imported into the U.S. from any country with known

TB or brucellosis reservoirs, in either livestock or wildlife, to be tested for TB and brucellosis prior to entering the United States.

  • Reverse the recently promulgated “regionalization” scheme that

would allow the importation of cattle or beef from countries with

  • ngoing disease outbreaks by carving out a specific region or zone

within those countries and designating products in that region eligible for export to the United States.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

The Present and Future Viability of the U.S. Cattle Industry Is Wholly Dependent on the Ability of U.S. Cattle Producers to Maintain a Healthy Cattle

  • Herd. This is Fundamental. And, this Is

Fundamentally Impossible if Congress and USDA Persist in their Support of Inadequate Disease Protections that Encourage the Introduction of Cattle Diseases from Foreign Sources. We Respectfully Urge Congress and USDA to Immediately Change its Present Course and Begin Aggressively to Protect our Borders from the Introduction and Spread of Avoidable Animal Diseases