The Impacts of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation Projects on Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the impacts of acid mine drainage remediation projects on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Impacts of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation Projects on Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Impacts of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation Projects on Water Quality, Aquatic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish Populations in the Deckers Creek Watershed Nicholas Revetta Project Manager Major Issues in our Watershed - E. coli & fecal


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Impacts of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation Projects on Water Quality, Aquatic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish Populations in the Deckers Creek Watershed Nicholas Revetta

Project Manager

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • E. coli & fecal coliform
  • CSOs
  • Unkempt farmland
  • Streambank failure
  • Sedimentation
  • Lack of shade
  • Stormwater runoff
  • Acid Mine Drainage

Major Issues in our Watershed

Kanes Creek

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Kanes Creek Subwatershed

slide-7
SLIDE 7

13 sites

⁻ 9 along the mainstem ⁻ 4 major tributaries

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Water Quality Sampling Methods

  • Sampled quarterly
  • Three samples collected in the thalweg:

– Sample 1: collected without filtration or preservation

  • Analyzed for acidity, alkalinity, pH, conductance, and sulfate

– Sample 2: collected through a 0.45 µm filter and preserved with 1:1 nitric acid/H2O

  • Analyzed for dissolved metal analysis

– Sample 3: collected without filtration and preserved with 1:1 nitric acid/H2O

  • Analyzed for total metal analysis
  • Temp., cond., DO, pH, and flow recorded on site
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Methods

  • Sampled annually
  • Followed West Virginia Stream

Condition Index (WVSCI) protocol

– 100 m representative reach – Composite of 4 equally spaced riffle samples – Rectangular dipnet – Preserved in ethanol and brought back to the lab for identification – Complete sort instead of capping at 200 individuals

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fish Sampling Methods

  • Sampled annually
  • Reach = 40 x average wetted width
  • 2 Backpack electroshockers utilized
  • Fish were identified, weighed, and measured on

site and then re-released into the stream

slide-11
SLIDE 11

0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

pH mg/L Average Kanes Creek Water Quality

Fe Al pH

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 WVSCI Score Year

Kanes Creek WVSCI

slide-13
SLIDE 13

R² = 0.6568 10 20 30 40 50 60 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Total Number of Fish Year

Kanes Creek Fish Abundance

slide-14
SLIDE 14

R² = 0.743 2 4 6 8 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Number of Fish Species Year

Kanes Creek Fish Diversity

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Input 2 Avg (lbs/yr)

pH – 3.5 Acidity – 20,652.55 Fe – 1,300.65 Al – 1,869.92

Input 1 Avg (lbs/yr)

pH – 3.1 Acidity – 19,889.70 Fe – 2,238.90 Al – 1,869.92

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Output (lbs/yr)

pH – 8.4 Acidity – 1.63 Fe – 26.12 Al – 13.06

Sum of inputs (lbs/yr)

pH – 3.3 Acidity – 40,542.24 Fe – 3,359.54 Al – 3,710.08

slide-18
SLIDE 18

6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50

pH mg/L

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Water Quality

Fe Al pH

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Richard Mine Pollution

Richard – 5 miles outside of town

Acidity – 730,500 lbs/yr Fe – 143,000 lbs/yr Al – 59,000 lbs/yr Mn – 3,200 lbs/yr

slide-21
SLIDE 21

5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 5 10 15 20 pH Miles to the Monongahela

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem pH

2002-2004 2005-2007 2008-2010 2011-2013 2014-2016

slide-22
SLIDE 22

5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 5 10 15 20 pH Miles to the Monongahela

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem pH

2002-2004 2005-2007 2008-2010 2011-2013 2014-2016

Kanes Creek Richard Mine

slide-23
SLIDE 23

1 2 3 4 5 5 10 15 20 Mg/L Miles to the Monongahela

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Iron

2002-2004 2005-2007 2008-2010 2011-2013 2014-2016

slide-24
SLIDE 24

1 2 3 4 5 5 10 15 20 Mg/L Miles to the Monongahela

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Iron

2002-2004 2005-2007 2008-2010 2011-2013 2014-2016

Kanes Creek Richard Mine

slide-25
SLIDE 25

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 5 10 15 20 mg/L Miles to the Monongahela

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Aluminum

2002-2004 2005-2007 2008-2010 2011-2013 2014-2016

slide-26
SLIDE 26

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 5 10 15 20 mg/L Miles to the Monongahela

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Aluminum

2002-2004 2005-2007 2008-2010 2011-2013 2014-2016

Kanes Creek Richard Mine

slide-27
SLIDE 27

25 50 75 100 5 10 15 20 WVSCI Score Miles to the Monongahela River

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem WVSCI

2007-2008 2009-2010 2011-2012 2013-2014 2015-2016

slide-28
SLIDE 28

25 50 75 100 5 10 15 20 WVSCI Score Miles to the Monongahela River

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem WVSCI

2007-2008 2009-2010 2011-2012 2013-2014 2015-2016

Kanes Creek Richard Mine

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 5 10 15 20 Number of Fish Species Miles to the Monongahela River

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Fish Diversity

2007-2008 2009-2010 2011-2012 2013-2014 2015-2016

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 5 10 15 20 Number of Fish Species Miles to the Monongahela River

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Fish Diversity

2007-2008 2009-2010 2011-2012 2013-2014 2015-2016

Kanes Creek Richard Mine

slide-31
SLIDE 31

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 5 10 15 20 Total Number of Fish Miles to the Monongahela River

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Fish Abundance

2007-2008 2009-2010 2011-2012 2013-2014 2015-2016

slide-32
SLIDE 32

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 5 10 15 20 Total Number of Fish Miles to the Monongahela River

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Fish Abundance

2007-2008 2009-2010 2011-2012 2013-2014 2015-2016

Kanes Creek Richard Mine

slide-33
SLIDE 33

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 5 10 15 20

Total Number of Fish

Miles to the Monongahela River

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Fish Abundance

2007- 2008 2009- 2010 2011- 2012 2013- 2014 2015- 2016

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

5 10 15 20

Number of Fish Species

Miles to the Monongahela River

Average Deckers Creek Mainstem Fish Diversity

2007- 2008 2009- 2010 2011- 2012 2013- 2014

slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • Strongest improvements are on Kanes Creek near
  • ur project sites
  • Headwater chemistry improvements appear to also

be reflected downstream in the mainstem, although to a lesser degree

  • WVSCI and fish abundance/diversity variability may

be due to other environmental conditions or the chance of sampling during spawning events

  • While the entire mainstem is seeing water quality

improvements, certain areas are seeing more biological improvement than others. This may require additional physical habitat or other studies to determine why.

Discussion

slide-38
SLIDE 38