Transportation Asset Management Webinar Series Webinar 34 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transportation Asset Management Webinar Series

Webinar 34

Integrating PM2 Targets with the TAMP

Sponsored by FHWA and AASHTO Webinar 34 – October 10, 2018

FHWA-AASHTO Asset Management Webinar Series

• This is the 34th in a webinar series that

has been running since 2012

• Webinars are held every two months,
• n topics such as off-system assets,

asset management plans, asset management and risk management, and more

• We welcome ideas for future webinar

topics and presentations

• Submit your questions using the

webinar’s Q&A feature

1

Welcome

2

• FHWA and the AASHTO Sub-Committee on Asset

Management are pleased to sponsor this webinar

• Sharing knowledge is a critical component of advancing

asset management practice

DOT PM2 Reporting DOT PM2 Target Setting

PM2 Targets and the TAMP

4

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2019 2018 Initial TAMP Complete TAMP

Where are we now?

DOT PM2 Reporting DOT PM2 Target Setting

PM2 Targets and the TAMP

3

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2019 2018 Initial TAMP Complete TAMP

Where are we now?

MPO PM2 Target Setting

Learning Objectives

4

– Building working knowledge of key concepts and definitions relevant to transportation asset management – Beginning to apply this knowledge in the context of PM2 Targets and TAMPs to answer:

• What approaches are agencies taking to coordinate PM2 Targets with the

TAMP?

• What benefits can my agency expect by better integrating PM2 target setting

with the TAMP?

• What are key lessons-learned for agencies as they move forward with

developing their complete TAMPs?

• SHARE LESSONS LEARNED, IDEAS, KNOWLEDGE!!!

5

Webinar Agenda

2:00 Webinar Introduction and Overview Steve Gaj (FHWA) Hyun-A Park (Spy Pond Partners, LLC) 2:10 Caltrans Target Setting Approach Michael Johnson (Caltrans) 2:30 Maryland Experience Meredith Hill (Maryland SHA) 2:50 Wyoming Integration of Pavement and Bridge Targets with the TAMP Martin Kidner (Wyoming DOT) 3:10 Q&A and Wrap Up

Caltrans Target Setting Approach

Michael Johnson P.E. State Asset Management Engineer October 2018

California’s Regional Planning Partners

• 18 Metropolitan Planning

Organizations

• 26 Regional Transportation

Planning Agencies

California Pavement Inventory

Bridge and Pavement Target Setting Workshop | Slide 3

Note: *Road Miles (RM) is center lane miles ** Lane Miles (LM) represents the measures for the NHS Source: 2016 HPMS Data

2016 Total California Pavement Inventory 180,351 Road Miles (RM*) 402,466 Lane Miles (LM**)

State 14,776 RM 49,682 LM Local 165,574 RM 352,784 LM

State Non-NHS 6,319 RM 13,033 LM = 26% State State NHS 8,458 RM 36,649 LM = 74% State Local NHS 5,450 RM 19,427 LM = 6% Local Local Non NHS 160,124 RM 333,357 LM = 94% Local

NHS Target Setting

California Bridge Inventory

Bridge and Pavement Target Setting Workshop | Slide 4

Source: National Bridge Inventory (NBI) bridges Note: NHS Targets are required on NBI bridges, non-NBI bridges excluded Note: There are over 250 Local Agency owners of NHS bridges of which 87% own less than 10 bridges *Deck area in thousand square feet (KSF)

2017 Total California NBI Inventory 24,868 Bridges Deck Area – 325,870 KSF*

State 12,413 Bridges Deck Area – 252,566 KSF Local 12,455 Bridges Deck Area – 73,304 KSF

State Non-NHS 3,217 Bridges Deck Area= 17% State State NHS 9,196 Bridges Deck Area=83% State Local NHS* 1,629 Bridges Deck Area= 32% Local Local Non NHS 10,826 Bridges Deck Area= 68% Local

NHS Target Setting

• 1. Identify the inventory and current condition of NHS pavements

and bridges

• 2. Solicit expected 2 and 4 year targets from all NHS owners
• 3. Use a quantity weighted approach to develop a statewide

targets

Target Setting Approach

Click to edit Master title style

Example Calculation

• Caltrans solicited MPO input before establishing targets
• State of California targets reflect each agencies expectations
• The approach is transparent and inclusive

Summary

MARYLAND’S NHS ASSET MANAGEMENT

• Ms. Meredith Hill, Performance Planner

• MDOT & the System
• NHS in Maryland
• Targets and Projections
• Delivering the Final TAMP
• MDOT Asset Management
• Lessons Learned

ABOUT OUR (MDOT SHA) SYSTEM

SYSTEM PRESERVATION TRADEOFFS

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Other Pavement and Bridges

Actual Projected

Million

Access Controls ADA Retrofit Bicycle Retrofit Bridge Replace & Rehab. Capital Equipment CHART Communications Commuter Action Improvements Crash Prevention Drainage Emergency Enhancements Environmental Compliance Environmental Preservation Guardrail End Treatment Intersection Capacity Neighborhood Conservation Noise Barriers Park-n-Ride Pedestrian Access to Transit Railroad Crossings Railroad Safety & Spot Rest Areas & Information Centers Resurfacing & Rehabilitation Safety & Spot Sidewalks Statewide Planning & Research TMDL Compliance Traffic Management Urban Reconstruction

MDOT SHA Program

NHS IN MARYLAND

NHS Owners

• MDOT SHA
• MDOT MAA
• MDTA
• ACoE
• NPS
• Counties
• Municipalities
• Parks

Commission

Partners

• FHWA MD

Division Office

• MPOs

DEVELOPING THE NHS STORY

Bridges

• MDOT SHA submits NBIS for non-federal

structures, only.

• Has historical records for non-federal

structures

• Mature BMS capable of reasonable non-

federal condition projections

Pavement

• MDOT SHA collects all I&C information for

the directional lane miles of the NHS, regardless of ownership

• Has historical records for IRI, cracking,

faulting, & rutting

• Mature PMS capable of reasonable

condition projections

PERFORMANCE PROJECTIONS - BRIDGES

http://arcg.is/1r04uH

PERFORMANCE PROJECTIONS - PAVEMENT

DELIVERING ON TPM AND TAM

Data Collection Content Development Review Submission Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Early June

• Leadership Directive
• Building the Team
• Increasing shared competencies
• Data and Information
• Incorporate vulnerability into

management systems and project development

• Balance increasing tradeoff realities

with state of good repair practice and commitments

MDOT ASSET MANAGEMENT GOALS

The Department Asset Management Program is focused on the following goals:

1.

Know What We Own – Develop & Maintain Accurate Asset Inventory and Information

2.

Know What Condition Our Assets are In – Implement Conditioning Protocols & Track Maintenance/Costs

3.

Establish Plan for Maintaining a State of Good Repair – Develop & Document Processes & Procedures

4.

Commit to Asset Management Practices – Educate and Train Workforce in AM Practices

5.

Develop a Framework & Guidance for Asset Management Software

6.

Integrate Asset Management into How We Do Business

Critical Infrastructure ✓ Pavement ✓ Large Structures ✓ Rail ✓ Tunnels ✓ Facilities ✓ Vehicle Fleet & Equipment ✓ IT Systems

QUESTIONS

Meredith Hill

Performance Planner MDOT SHA, Innovative Performance Planning Division 410-545-8739 mhill8@sha.state.md.us http://arcg.is/1r04uH

http://data.imap.maryland.gov/pages/mdot/

Wyoming Integration of Pavement and Bridge Targets with TAMP

Martin Kidner State Planning Engineer, WYDOT

Critical Communication

• How fast can you change the needle?
• Will your funding change predictably?
• How do you handle inflation?

10/10/18

2

Buckle up

Space-Time Continuum

• Understand time from decision to

reporting.

– Legislature provides new funds (July 2009) – Contracts let (August 2009) – Crushing and paving (Summer 2010) – Measure (NHS every other year, 2011) – Report to HPMS (April 2012)

• “instant” reaction is a three year delay

10/10/18

3

Buckle up

Construction and Contract Maintenance History

10/10/18

4

Buckle up

Effects of inflation, constant funding scenario

10/10/18

5

Buckle up

40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 Year

Non-Interstate NHS Condition Projections 4% Inflation Rate

Good + Excellent Target

Treatments are not system wide

10/10/18

6

Buckle up

• We are treating about 10% of the

interstate pavements per year

• The change in condition is relatively

slow

Don’t Fall Behind

10 year projection begins to indicate the condition of long life assets

10/10/18

7

Buckle up

So What?

• 2 year outcomes are already in the

pipeline

• 4 year targets don’t adequately show

the trends

• Assets are long lived, and need to

project longer term. How do we indicate compliance with the TAMP?

10/10/18

8

Buckle up

Output versus Outcome

• Output example: dollars spent on

pavement treatment.

• Outcome example: number of 0.1 mile

segments changed from poor to good with the lowest life cycle cost.

10/10/18

9

Buckle up

Management Systems

10/10/18

10

Buckle up

• Wyoming’s management system

indicates miles of light, medium, and heavy (1S, 2S, 3S) pavement treatment per system type

• Track committed projects by system,

type of treatment, and validates locations

QUESTIONS?

Martin Kidner, WYDOT, Planning Engineer martin.kidner@wyo.gov (307)777-4411

10/10/18

Buckle up

11

Questions?

• Submit your questions using the webinar’s Q&A feature

6

All webinars available online:

http://www.tam-portal.com/event/

Next Webinar

Wednesday, December 12, 2018 – 2:00 PM EST More to follow!

http://www.tam-portal.com/event/