Update on the F 2 experiment Abel Sun Carnegie Mellon University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

update on the f 2 experiment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Update on the F 2 experiment Abel Sun Carnegie Mellon University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Update on the F 2 experiment Abel Sun Carnegie Mellon University Hall C Collaboration Meeting, Jan 28-29, 2020, Jefferson Lab Outline Physics Motivations Analysis Preliminary Results Constraints for pdf global fits Timing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Update on the F2 experiment

Abel Sun Carnegie Mellon University

Hall C Collaboration Meeting, Jan 28-29, 2020, Jefferson Lab

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Physics Motivations
  • Constraints for pdf global fits
  • Quark-hadron duality
  • Moments
  • Resonance and deep inelastic

scattering modeling

  • Analysis
  • Timing cuts
  • Calibrations
  • Detector efficiency studies
  • Background:

pion contamination, charge symmetric background

  • Other corrections: radiative

effects

  • Preliminary Results
  • Cross sections
  • D/H ratios
  • F2 structure functions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Constraints for PDFs

  • CTEQ-JLab (CJ) performs global QCD fits of PDFs from data including deep-inelastic lepton-

nucleon scattering, proton-proton collisions (lepton pair creation, W-boson and jet production), etc., with particular focus on the large-x region

  • We measured both H and D cross sections (free protons and bound neutrons)

SU(6)

scaler diquarks

DSE-1 DSE-2

To improve uncertainty in d/u extraction specially at large X

E12-10-002

W2=3 GeV2 W2=12.25 GeV2

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Structure functions in resonance region on average behave like structure functions in DIS regime.
  • It’s a fundamental property of nucleon structure -

Observed in: F2p, F1p, FLp, F2n, F2d, F2C, F2Fe, F2Au, A1p, g1p, g1d, g1n, g13He, SIDIS

Quark-hadron duality

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Define duality intervals

Quark-Hadron Duality Studies

Region 1st 2nd 3rd 4th DIS global Wmin 1.3 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.9 1.9 Wmax 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.9 4.5 4.5

  • How well resonance data average

to the scaling curve?

  • Calculate moments:

From DIS data only In Resonance region

  • What scaling curve and scaling variable should we use?
slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • S. Malace, et al., Phys.Rev. C80 (2009) 035207

Quark-Hadron Duality Studies: Example

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Quark-Hadron Duality Studies: Example

  • Take out the Q2 dependence using the DIS

curve

  • Average over a range of Q2 at fixed x over a

number of resonances including peaks and valleys

  • New duality averaging method to include resonance region data in global PDF fits

from Eric Christy

slide-8
SLIDE 8

6 GeV data Data: 2M2p – M2p+n

Non-Singlet Moments as Tests of LQCD

work by Ibrahim Albayrak

  • Test LQCD calculations by comparing non-singlet moments

from LQCD to those extracted from data.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Deuteron fit Proton fit

Resonance / DIS Modeling

  • A physics driven global fit to inclusive cross section is very valuable:

radiative and bin-centering corrections, rates, moments of structure functions and duality studies, dilution factors in spin structure functions, physics of nucleon resonances Deuteron Fit Proton Fit

  • Provides constraints to larger Q2

– up to 16 GeV2 for both proton and deuteron fit

  • Provides a complete data set (proton and

deuteron) for a precise neutron extraction

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Hall C Spectrometers

Push to high Q2 LH2, LD2, Al 71% of total data were taken by SHMS

  • Run in spring 2018
  • Beam energy: 10.6 GeV
slide-11
SLIDE 11

E12-10-002: Measurements of H(e,e’) and D(e,e’)

Angle Momentum(GeV/c) 21 2.7, 3.3, 4.0, 5.1 25 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.4 29 2.0, 2.4, 3.0, 3.7 33 1.7, 2.1, 2.6, 3.2 39 1.3, 1.6, 2.0, 2.5 We will extract H,D(e,e’) cross sections. SHMS

X Q2

relative uncertainties Angle Momentum(GeV/c) 21 2.7 29 2.0, 2.7 39 1.3, 1.8 positron data LH2

W2=3 GeV2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Angle Momentum(GeV/c) 21 3.3, 4.0, 4.5, 5.1, 5.7 59 1.05, 1.18, 1.35, 1.50

E12-10-002: Measurements of H(e,e’) and D(e,e’)

  • 59 deg: pushed to higher Q2, up to

16 GeV2

  • 21 deg: to cross calibrate with

SHMS data

  • Larger angle has lower rate. Ample

amount of time was given for data taking.

HMS

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Analysis Flow and Status

  • Achieved 100 % statistical goal for all the kinematics.
  • 1. Timing Cuts (✓)
  • 2. Calibration (✓)
  • BCM - Deb’s talk
  • Hodoscope
  • Drift Chamber
  • Calorimeter
  • Cherenkov
  • 3. Efficiency Study - in progress
  • Tracking Efficiency Study
  • Trigger Efficiency Study
  • Computer Dead Time
  • Calorimeter and Cherenkov

Cut Efficiency

  • Pion Contamination
  • 4. Charge Symmetric

Background - in progress

  • 5. Acceptance Study -

understand via Monte Carlo

  • 6. Radiative corrections -

calculated using existed model

  • 7. Cross Section Calculation -

extracted

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cherenkov calibration

npeSum monitor plot

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Calorimeter calibration

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Tracking Efficiency Study

Important tracking parameters

from Deb

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Charge Symmetric Background

from Gabriel and Ioana Niculescu

Angle Momentum(GeV/c) 21 2.7 29 2.0, 2.7 39 1.3, 1.8

The positron cross-section is parametrized as dσ dΩdE′ = ep0(ep1(E−E′) + 1)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Preliminary Results

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cross Section Extraction

YDATA(E′, θ) = ( d2σ dΩdE′)DATA[(∆Ω∆E′) ∗ ADATA(E′, θ) ∗ L]

YMC(E′, θ) = ( d2σ dΩdE′)model[(∆Ω∆E′) ∗ AMC(E′, θ) ∗ L]

d2σ dΩdE′ = YDATA(E′, θ)/[(∆Ω∆E′) ∗ ADATA(E′, θ) ∗ L]

d2σ dΩdE′ = σmodel ∗ [YDATA(E′, θ)/YMC(E′, θ)]

Acceptance correction method Monte Carlo ratio method

luminosity acceptance solid angle

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Cross Section Extraction - Monte Carlo Ratio Method red: data Yellow: MC

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

Preliminary H(e,e’) Cross Sections - Monte Carlo Ratio Method

w/o csb subtraction

  • Overlap between momentum settings

looks pretty good.

  • >We understand acceptance fairly well.
  • Bodek model is used (solid curve)

(Only statistical errors shown)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Preliminary D(e,e’) Cross Sections - Monte Carlo Ratio Method

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

w/o csb subtraction

  • Overlap between momentum settings

looks pretty good.

  • >We understand acceptance fairly well.
  • Bodek model is used (solid curve)

(Only statistical errors shown)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Preliminary σD/σH Ratios

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

  • Data from MC ratio method
  • Only statistical uncertainties are shown
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Preliminary F2

d2σ dΩdE′ = σMott( 2 M F1(x, Q2)tan2θ 2+1 νF2(x, Q2)) d2σ dΩdE′ = Γ(σT(x, Q2) + σL(x, Q2)) , where R ≡ σL σT , = [1+2(1+ ν2 Q2)tan2θ 2]−1

F2 = σ σMott ν 1 + R 1 + R

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Summary

  • Preliminary H(e,e’) and D(e,e’) cross sections and D/H ratios look promising.
  • We are looking forward to a varied physics output:

PDF extraction, quark-hadron duality studies, resonance and DIS modeling…

Thanks for listening!