VAPING
The science and culture of electronic cigarette use Kent PTSA - March 5, 2019
VAPING The science and culture of electronic cigarette use Kent - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
VAPING The science and culture of electronic cigarette use Kent PTSA - March 5, 2019 What Are E-Cigarettes Battery Atomizer/ Coil Absorbent Material/ Cotton Nicotine Propylene glycol Vegetable glycerin Flavorants CHKS Data - Marin
The science and culture of electronic cigarette use Kent PTSA - March 5, 2019
What Are E-Cigarettes
Battery Atomizer/ Coil
Nicotine Propylene glycol Vegetable glycerin Flavorants
Absorbent Material/ Cotton
CHKS Data - Marin County (2017-18)
Early e-cigarettes
The New Generation
The Usual Suspects
by cigarette companies
healthy alternative
Who owns what?
64% Market Share)
Parliament, Virginia Slims)
share in the world)
How E-Cig Companies Appeal to Youth
○ “I want the new upgrade!”
Targeting Youth
Matty Smokes)
Health effects of Vape Flavoring
○ Cinnamaldehyde ○ 2-Methoxycinnamaldehyde ○ Benzaldehyde
(Stanford)
Signs a teen might be vaping
Not an Alternative!
Health Effects
hydrocarbons
HARMFUL CHEMICALS FOUND IN CIGARETTES
Quitting and Addiction
than all drugs beside opiates
○ Withdrawal analogies; starvation, extreme dehydration, phone separation :)
LAWS AND REGULATIONS
In 2016 the FDA passed the Deeming Law requiring all NEW E-cigarettes that are put on the market to meet the standards of the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act. Many e-cigarette companies (JUUL, MarkTen, Blu, Logic & Vuse) had already been developed at this point and were grandfathered into the law. The deeming law states that compliance for existing products (those listed above) have until 2022 to file for exemptions before they will test their products. {This Law has been postponed} All E-Cigs wont get regulated until 2022.
Cannabis products
Vaporizers, Dab Pens Use Cannabis oil, wax, concentrates
What does TUPE do about it?
each other
students (45 min)
JV Football, Middle Schools, etc.)
partnering with Wellness center Spring ‘19
(1st offense*)
Feedback from Prevention efforts
50% of students who vape reported reducing their intake in the weeks since the presentation
Feedback from Interventions
85% said intervention made them think that vaping was worse than they thought (31% “a lot”, 54% “some”)* 84% recognize vaping as “very dangerous” to one’s health* 38.5% report quitting following intervention* 46% report vaping less than before intervention* * meetings between
January & May; survey in June
HOW TO HELP: PREVENTION vs. INTERVENTION
PREVENTION
because mind is not yet made up
“perceived parent restrictions” & monitoring
INTERVENTION
desire is already established (Cialdini)
commitment
achieve commitment
COLLABORATIVE EFFORT
Within School
Community at large
Do your P.A.R.T.
Good news!
You being here makes a difference
WORKS CITED
Benchaya, Mariana C. “Non-Authoritative Parents and Impact on Drug Use: the Perception of Adolescent Children.” Journal of Pediatrics (Brazil), vol. 87, no. 3, 2011, pp. 238–244. Cabane, Olivia Fox. The Charisma Myth: Master the Art of Personal Magnetism. Portfolio Penguin, 2013. Cialdini, Robert B. Influence: the Psychology of Persuasion. Collins, 1984. Perozzi, Maria E. “EXAMINING ADOLESCENT DRINKING AND ADOLESCENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF PARENTAL MONITORING, COMMUNICATION, AND PARENTING STYLE IN A RURAL SETTING.” Pennsylvania State University, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 10 Aug. 2007, citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.528.3822&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Shakya, Holly B. “Parental Influence on Substance Use in Adolescent Social Networks.” Archives of Adolescent and Pediatric Medicine, vol. 166, no. 12, Dec. 2012, pp. 1132–1139. Tobacco Prevention Toolkit. “Tobacco Prevention Tool Kit.” Tobacco Prevention Toolkit, Stanford University Medical School, 2018, med.stanford.edu/tobaccopreventiontoolkit.html. Williams, Rebecca J. “The Impact of Parent-Child Discussions and Parent Restrictions on Adolescent Alcohol Consumption.” Hawai'i Medical Journal, vol. 69, no. 6, June 2010, pp. 145–147.