Wave-Equation Migration Velocity Analysis Paul Sava and Biondo Biondi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

wave equation migration velocity analysis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Wave-Equation Migration Velocity Analysis Paul Sava and Biondo Biondi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wave-Equation Migration Velocity Analysis Paul Sava and Biondo Biondi * Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University EAGE 2004 Workshop on Velocity biondo@stanford.edu Deep-water subsalt imaging 2 1) Potentials of wavefield-continuation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

biondo@stanford.edu

Wave-Equation Migration Velocity Analysis

Paul Sava and Biondo Biondi* Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University EAGE 2004 Workshop on Velocity

slide-2
SLIDE 2

biondo@stanford.edu

2

Deep-water subsalt imaging

1) Potentials of wavefield-continuation methods can be fulfilled only if we use MVA methods based on:

  • Wavefield-continuation migration
  • Salt-boundary picking
  • Below salt Common Image Gathers (CIG)
  • Wavefield-continuation velocity updating

2) We may need to go beyond downward-continuation migration methods and … be able to perform MVA

slide-3
SLIDE 3

biondo@stanford.edu

3

Deep-water subsalt imaging - Velocity problem?

1) Potentials of wavefield-continuation methods can be fulfilled only if we use MVA methods based on:

  • Wavefield-continuation migration
  • Salt-boundary picking
  • Below salt Common Image Gathers (CIG)
  • Wavefield-continuation velocity updating

2) We may need to go beyond downward-continuation migration methods and … be able to perform MVA

slide-4
SLIDE 4

biondo@stanford.edu

4

Deep-water subsalt imaging - Illumination?

1) Potentials of wavefield-continuation methods can be fulfilled only if we use MVA methods based on:

  • Wavefield-continuation migration
  • Salt-boundary picking
  • Below salt Common Image Gathers (CIG)
  • Wavefield-continuation velocity updating

2) We may need to go beyond downward-continuation migration methods and … be able to perform MVA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

biondo@stanford.edu

5

“Simple” wavepath with f=126 Hz

slide-6
SLIDE 6

biondo@stanford.edu

6

“Complex” wavepath with f=126 Hz

slide-7
SLIDE 7

biondo@stanford.edu

7

“Messy” wavepath with f=126 Hz

slide-8
SLIDE 8

biondo@stanford.edu

8

“Messy” wavepath with f=13 Hz

slide-9
SLIDE 9

biondo@stanford.edu

9

“Messy” wavepath with f=15 Hz

slide-10
SLIDE 10

biondo@stanford.edu

10

“Messy” wavepath with f=112 Hz

slide-11
SLIDE 11

biondo@stanford.edu

11

“Messy” wavepath with f=116 Hz

slide-12
SLIDE 12

biondo@stanford.edu

12

“Messy” wavepath with f=126 Hz

slide-13
SLIDE 13

biondo@stanford.edu

13

Wavepaths in 3-D

slide-14
SLIDE 14

biondo@stanford.edu

14

Wavepaths in 3-D – Banana or doughnuts?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

biondo@stanford.edu

15

Brief history of velocity estimation with wavefield methods

  • Full waveform inversion (Tarantola, 1984, Pratt, today)
  • Diffraction tomography (Devaney and Oristaglio, 1984)
  • Wave-equation tomography (Woodward, 1990; Luo and Schuster 1991)
  • Differential Semblance Optimization (Symes and Carazzone, 1991)

Challenges of velocity estimation with wavefield methods

  • Limitations of the first-order Born linearization (“Born limitations”)
  • Problems with large (in extent and value) velocity errors
  • Dependent on accurate amplitudes both in the data and in the modeling
  • Computational and storage requirements of explicit use of wavepaths

Velocity Analysis and wavefield methods

slide-16
SLIDE 16

biondo@stanford.edu

16

Receivers Sources

Depth

γ1

Vmig = Vtrue

γ1 γ2 γ3

γ2 γ3

α

Velocity information in ADCIGs - Correct velocity

slide-17
SLIDE 17

biondo@stanford.edu

17

Receivers Sources

Depth

γ1

Vmig < Vtrue

γ1 γ2 γ3

γ2 γ3

α

Vmig < Vtrue

Δl1 < Δl2 < Δl3 Δl2 Δl1 Δl3

Velocity information in ADCIGs - Low velocity

slide-18
SLIDE 18

biondo@stanford.edu

18

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into Δz

3)

Invert Δz into Δs by solving: where Lray is given by raytracing

Ray-tomography Migration Velocity Analysis

( )

2 ray Ä

Ä min s z

s

Δ − L W

slide-19
SLIDE 19

biondo@stanford.edu

19

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into ΔI

3)

Invert ΔI into Δs by solving: where Lwave is given by first-order Born linearization of wavefield continuation

( )

2 wave Ä

Ä min s I

s

Δ − L W

Wave-Equation Migration Velocity Analysis

slide-20
SLIDE 20

biondo@stanford.edu

20

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into ΔI

3)

Invert ΔI into Δs by solving: where Lwave is given by first-order Born linearization of wavefield continuation

( )

2 wave Ä

Ä min s I

s

Δ − L W

Sava and Biondi (2004) Important!

Wave-Equation Migration Velocity Analysis

slide-21
SLIDE 21

biondo@stanford.edu

21

wave

L

Ray tomography MVA  Wave-Equation MVA

ray

L

slide-22
SLIDE 22

biondo@stanford.edu

22

wave

L

Ray tomography MVA  Wave-Equation MVA

ray

L

slide-23
SLIDE 23

biondo@stanford.edu

23

wave

L

Ray tomography MVA  Wave-Equation MVA

ray

L

ΔI Δz

slide-24
SLIDE 24

biondo@stanford.edu

24

1) Potentials of wavefield-continuation methods can be fulfilled only if we use MVA methods based on:

  • Wavefield-continuation migration
  • Salt-boundary picking
  • Below salt Common Image Gathers (CIG)
  • Wavefield-continuation velocity updating

2) We may need to go beyond downward-continuation migration methods and … be able to perform MVA

Deep-water subsalt data

slide-25
SLIDE 25

biondo@stanford.edu

25

Deep-water subsalt data - Initial velocity

slide-26
SLIDE 26

biondo@stanford.edu

26

Deep-water subsalt data - Initial velocity

slide-27
SLIDE 27

biondo@stanford.edu

27

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into ΔI

3)

Invert ΔI into Δs by solving:

( )

2 wave Ä

Ä min s I

s

Δ − L W

Deep-water subsalt data – WEMVA step 1)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

biondo@stanford.edu

28

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into ΔI

3)

Invert ΔI into Δs by solving:

( )

2 wave Ä

Ä min s I

s

Δ − L W

Deep-water subsalt data – WEMVA step 1)

Δρ=ρ−1

slide-29
SLIDE 29

biondo@stanford.edu

29

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into ΔI

3)

Invert ΔI into Δs by solving:

( )

2 wave Ä

Ä min s I

s

Δ − L W

Deep-water subsalt data – WEMVA step 2)

ΔI

slide-30
SLIDE 30

biondo@stanford.edu

30

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into ΔI

3)

Invert ΔI into Δs by solving:

( )

2 wave Ä

Ä min s I

s

Δ − L W

Deep-water subsalt data – WEMVA step 2)

Δρ=ρ−1

slide-31
SLIDE 31

biondo@stanford.edu

31

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into ΔI

3)

Invert ΔI into Δs by solving:

( )

2 wave Ä

Ä min s I

s

Δ − L W W

Deep-water subsalt data – WEMVA step 3)

ΔI W

slide-32
SLIDE 32

biondo@stanford.edu

32

1)

Measure errors in ADCIGs by measuring curvature (ρ)

2)

Convert measured ρ into ΔI

3)

Invert ΔI into Δs by solving:

( )

2 wave Ä

Ä min s I

s

Δ − L W

s0+Δs s0

Deep-water subsalt data – WEMVA step 3)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

biondo@stanford.edu

33

Deep-water subsalt data – Initial velocity

slide-34
SLIDE 34

biondo@stanford.edu

34

Deep-water subsalt data – Velocity after 2 iterat.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

biondo@stanford.edu

35

Deep-water subsalt data – Initial image Image

slide-36
SLIDE 36

biondo@stanford.edu

36

Image Deep-water subsalt data – Image after 2 iterat.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

biondo@stanford.edu

37

Deep-water subsalt data – Initial ADCIGs ADCIGs

slide-38
SLIDE 38

biondo@stanford.edu

38

ADCIGs Deep-water subsalt data – ADCIGs after 2 iterat.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

biondo@stanford.edu

39

Deep-water subsalt data – Initial ADCIGs ADCIGs

slide-40
SLIDE 40

biondo@stanford.edu

40

ADCIGs Deep-water subsalt data – ADCIGs after 2 iterat.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

biondo@stanford.edu

41

Δρ Δρ=ρ-1 White  flat ADCIGs Deep-water subsalt data – Initial Δρ Δρ=ρ-1

slide-42
SLIDE 42

biondo@stanford.edu

42

Deep-water subsalt data – Δρ Δρ after 2 iterations Δρ Δρ=ρ-1 White  flat ADCIGs

slide-43
SLIDE 43

biondo@stanford.edu

43

Deep-water subsalt data – W after 2 iterations Weights White  reliable ρ picks

slide-44
SLIDE 44

biondo@stanford.edu

44

  • Ray-based Migration Velocity Analysis (MVA) methods

have been successful in complex structure, but they are challenged by subsalt velocity estimation.

Conclusions

slide-45
SLIDE 45

biondo@stanford.edu

45

  • Ray-based Migration Velocity Analysis (MVA) methods

have been successful in complex structure, but they are challenged by subsalt velocity estimation.

  • Wave-equation MVA (WEMVA) can be accomplished while

preserving the work-flow of conventional ray-based MVA methods.

Conclusions

slide-46
SLIDE 46

biondo@stanford.edu

46

  • Ray-based Migration Velocity Analysis (MVA) methods

have been successful in complex structure, but they are challenged by subsalt velocity estimation.

  • Wave-equation MVA (WEMVA) can be accomplished while

preserving the work-flow of conventional ray-based MVA methods.

  • The velocity function estimated by the use of our WEMVA

method results in flatter ADCIGS and more coherent reflectors, even if we started from a high-quality velocity function that was estimated with ray-based MVA.

Conclusions

slide-47
SLIDE 47

biondo@stanford.edu

47

  • Ray-based Migration Velocity Analysis (MVA) methods

have been successful in complex structure, but they are challenged by subsalt velocity estimation.

  • Wave-equation MVA (WEMVA) can be accomplished while

preserving the work-flow of conventional ray-based MVA methods.

  • The velocity function estimated by the use of our WEMVA

method results in flatter ADCIGS and more coherent reflectors, even if we started from a high-quality velocity function that was estimated with ray-based MVA.

  • Poor illumination prevents the extraction of reliable velocity

information from ADCIGs at every location, and thus presents a challenge also for WEMVA.

Conclusions

slide-48
SLIDE 48

biondo@stanford.edu

48

Acknowledgments

BP and ExxonMobil, and Frederic Billette at BP, for Deep Water GOM data. Total for North Sea data set. SMAART JV and J. Paffenholz (BHP) for the Sigsbee data set. SEP sponsors for financial support.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

biondo@stanford.edu

49