- 1-
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
59 th ECTC San Diego May 26 May 29, 2009 Examination of Nickel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
59 th ECTC San Diego May 26 May 29, 2009 Examination of Nickel Underlayer as a Tin Whisker Mitigator Lyudmyla Panashchenko and Michael Osterman Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering University of Maryland, College Park -1-
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
whiskers to thousands per component
voltage may cause whisker vaporizing into conductive plasma of metal ions
hundreds of amps
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
(†) JESD22-A121A does not prescribe duration of tests or Acceptance criteria. JESD201 should be used for that (*) Earlier version JESD22-A121, published May 2005
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
Same whisker viewed from two different angles
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
Too many whiskers to be tilting each one Some whiskers exhibit complicated geometries Geometry of sample may not allow much degree of freedom Nevertheless, any modeling of whisker length requires a statistically significant number
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
2 2 2 2
cd ce cd ce cd ab
Axis along Lac is the tilt axis Lcd = projection of whisker length on axis perpendicular to tilt axis in Plane 1 Lce = projection of whisker length on axis perpendicular to tilt axis in Plane 2 = tilt angle between Plane 1 and Plane 2 = angle between Lcd and Lad in Plane 1
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
average ± STD
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
5 10 15 20 25 30 1-5 11-15 21-25 31-35 41-45 51-55 61-65 71-75 81-85 91-95 101-105 111-115 121-125 131-135 141-145 151-155 161-165 171-175 181-185 191-195 201-205 211-215 221-225 231-235 241-245 251-255 Length Groups (µm) % Occurrence
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1-1.5 1.6-2 2.1-2.5 2.6-3 3.1-3.5 3.6-4 4.1-4.5 4.6-5 5.1-5.5 5.6-6 6.1-6.5 6.6-7 7.1-7.5 7.6-8 8.1-8.5 8.6-9 9.1-9.5 9.6-10 10.1-10.5 10.6-11 11.1-11.5 11.6-12 12.1-12.5 12.6-13 13.1-13.5 13.6-14 Diameter Groups (µm) % Occurrence
Length Distribution at End of Test: Diameter Distribution at End of Test:
Log-Normal µ =1.48 = 0.40 = 0.9994 Log-Normal µ = 2.59 = 0.70 = 0.9754 Length Groups (µm) Diameter Groups (µm) % Occurrence
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
1.00 10.00 100.00 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00 Length (µm) Diameter (µm)
ρ ρ ρ ρ = -0.06
amount of tin in each whisker is similar
and diameter
NO CORRELATION found in any of the cases
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
Average Whisker Length (µm) Whisker Density (# whiskers/mm2)
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 Angle groups % occurrence
Note: Although not explicitly evident from this work, whisker growth angle CAN change during its growth period
Lyudmyla Panashchenko
May 26 – May 29, 2009