A Comparison of the Performance of Summer Steelhead Smolts Released - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a comparison of the performance of summer steelhead
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Comparison of the Performance of Summer Steelhead Smolts Released - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Comparison of the Performance of Summer Steelhead Smolts Released at Two Sizes From Wallowa Hatchery Lance Clarke, Mike Flesher and Rich Carmichael Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 203 Badgley Hall Eastern Oregon University This work


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Comparison of the Performance of Summer Steelhead Smolts Released at Two Sizes From Wallowa Hatchery

This work was funded by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service through the Lower Snake River Compensation Program

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 203 Badgley Hall Eastern Oregon University

Lance Clarke, Mike Flesher and Rich Carmichael

slide-2
SLIDE 2

LSR SRCP P Ob Obje jecti ctives

  • For eac

r each des esignate ted s sto tock, es establish an n ann nnual s sup upply of

  • f brood
  • d fish

h capable o e of m meet eting egg gg-tak take e goals. s.

  • Establish a

a to tota tal retu eturn o

  • f adult s

summer er steel elhead ead in O Ore regon that at meet eets compen ensati tion g goals.

  • Rees

esta tablish sport a t and t tribal al fisheri eries es.

  • Minimize

e the impacts acts of t the program am on residen ent t stocks of g game e fish. h.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Wh Why a a Siz ize a at Release S Study dy?

  • 1. Older studies were with smaller fish (5.5 – 35 fish/lb.).
  • 3. Address potential interactions with wild fish from

release size.

  • 2. Regional, stock, and hatchery specific factors

have produced variable results in past size at release studies.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Size a e at R Relea ease se S Study O y Objec ectives es

  • Smolts

ts grown to to tar target sizes of 5 5 fish/lb. (90 g (90 g) ) or r 4 4 fish/lb. (113 (113 g). ).

  • Compar

are e juven enile e migrati tion c charac acteri eristi tics cs a and passage i indices ces at Lower G er Granite D te Dam.

  • Determ

ermine e differ eren ences ces i in c catch contri tributi tion p pattern erns a and smolt-to to- adult s t survival al.

  • Compare age

e co compositi tion at t retu eturn.

  • Asse

sess ss producti ction effecti ectiven enes ess by c compari aring perf rform rman ance ce measur ures such h as adults prod

  • duc

uced per thous usand nd pound nds of smolts ts releas eased ed.

  • Compare s

stra ray rat rates.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Grande Ronde River Basin and Associated Hatchery Facilities

Washington Oregon

LOWER GRANITE DAM

N

20 20 40 Kilometers

Wallow

  • wa

a Hatc tche hery Irri rrigon Hatc tche hery

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Wallowa H a Hatchery a y and Adult Ladder

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Irrigon Fish Hatchery

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Wallo llowa H Hatchery A Acclim limatio tion P Pond

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Relea ease se Data S a Summar ary

Brood year Target size (fish/lb) Release dates Number Coded-wire tagged Number branded 1985 5 5 May 86 52,433 29,985 4 55,002 29,749 1986 5 25-27 Apr 87 46,571 29,132 4 50,019 29,123 1988 5 24 Apr 89 53,448 49,957 4 53,021 49,988 1989 5 19 Apr 90 53,097 50,329 4 52,820 49,711 1990 5 22 Apr 91 57,553 41,089 4 53,886 40,938

Wallow

  • wa S

a Stock S Steel eelhead head S Size a at R Relea ease S e Study

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Relea ease se Data S a Summar ary

Brood year Target size (fish/lb) Mean weight fish/lb (g) Mean Length (mm) 1985 5 5.4 (84.0) 204 4 3.9 (115.2) 224 1986 5 4.7 (96.9) 214 4 3.6 (124.5) 231 1988 5 5.3 (86.4) 203 4 3.8 (118.2) 223 1989 5 5.3 (85.9) 202 4 4.2 (108.0) 218 1990 5 4.5 (101.0) 212 4 3.9 (116.6) 222

Wallow

  • wa S

a Stock S Steel eelhead head S Size a at R Relea ease S e Study

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Length Freq equen ency D y Distribution ( (198 989)

Wallow

  • wa S

a Stock S Steel eelhead head S Size a at R Relea ease S e Study

5 10 15 20 25 30 150 175 200 225 250 275

For

  • rk Leng

Length (m (mm)

5.3 Fish/lb 3.8 Fish/lb

Nu Numb mber o

  • f Fish
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Smol Smolt Passa ssage e at L Lower er G Granite D Dam

No significant difference P = 0.972

10 20 30 40 50 1985 1986 1988 1989 1990

Percent of Release Br Brood Y Year ear

5 Fish/lb 4 Fish/lb

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Mig Migratio ion T Tim imin ing to Lower er Gr Granite ite D Dam

5 Fish/lb 4 Fish/lb

Percent of Total to Lower Granite Dam

10 20 30 40 50

1989

10 20 30 40 50

1990

10 20 30 40 50 15 20 25 30 35 Week eek o

  • f th

the e Year ear

1991

10,173 10,884 14,900 12,078 18,030 18,141

  • No. Detected
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Smol Smolt to

  • Adul

ult Sur Survival

42% difference, significant, P = 0.006

554 1,063 540 483 105 224 627 891 680 1,053

5 Fish/lb 4 Fish/lb

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 1985 1986 1988 1989 1990

Br Brood Y Year ear Perce cent R nt Reco cover ered ed

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Stray R y Rate Index

, n = 199

199 , n = = 329 329

5 10 15 20 25 1985 1986 1988 1989 1990

  • No. Strays / Total Recoveries

Br Brood Y Year ear

66% difference, significant, P = 0.004

5 Fish/lb 4 Fish/lb

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Adul ult Pr Prod

  • duction
  • n C

Comp

  • mparison
  • n

12.8% difference, not significant, P = 0.179

20 40 60 80 100

1985 1986 1988 1989 1990 Adults Prodced / 1,000 lbs smolts

Br Brood Y Year ear

5 Fish/lb 4 Fish/lb

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ca Catc tch and E Escapem ement Di Distr tribution f for 1 198 989 Brood

Catch

5 fish/lb (n = 627) % of total 4 fish/lb (n = 891) % of total Columbia River: Net 28.2 28.5 Columbia River: Sport 13.1 9.3 Deschutes River 5.3 7.1 Snake River and Tributaries 24.9 29.6 Grande Ronde River 10.7 8.1 Ocean 0.0 0.4 Catch Total 82.2 83.0

Escapement

Deschutes Trap 4.9 3.9 Wallowa Hatchery 12.9 13.1 Escapement Total 17.8 17.0

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Age Compositon of Returns to Wallowa Hatchery

5 Fish per Pound 4 Fish per Pound Brood Years 1985-1990 (excluding 1987)

Age 4 (2-Ocean) 39.6% Age 3 (1-Ocean) 60.4% Age 3 (1-Ocean) 64.4% Age 4 (2-Ocean) 35.6%

N = 5,968 fish No significant difference P = 0.183

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Similar SAS and SRI Patterns, Why?

1. Inconsistent tag sampling rate among years. 2. Older age at return when SAS is higher. 3. When survival is high, smolts that may be predisposed to stray survive at a higher rate. 4. Residualism-varying rates of residualism would influence the SAS calculation and could vary the percentage of outmigrating smolts that are inclined to stray as adults. 5. Adults might stray more when run sizes are large. 6. A spurious correlation. Some Hypotheses

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Summa Summary

1. 1. There e was n no consisten tent t trend i in smolt passage e indices ces or migrati tion timing. 2. 2. Smolt-to to-ad adult survival al was g grea eater i ter in f four o r of five y e year ars a and w was significan cantly b better er over er the five-year ear period for r the fish r releas eased ed a at 4 fish/lb compar ared ed to 5 fish/lb. 3. 3. Number er of adults ts produced ced p per 1,000 l 00 lbs of smolts ts releas eased ed was as grea eater er in four r of five e year ars but w was as n not s significan cantl tly better er over r th the f e five-year p ear peri riod. 4. 4. Large e sized ed smolts ts strayed ed a at a a higher r er rate e in every ery year ar. 5. 5. Catch a and escapem emen ent t distri ributi tion was s similar ar for r all brood year ars. 6. 6. There e was n no differ eren ence ce in mean age c compositi tion of r return rns.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Othe her C Cons

  • nsideration
  • ns

Total al Sm Smolt lt Producti ction: A releas ease s e size c e change e to 4 fish/lb mean eans fewer er smolts ts needed ed to reac ach adult t producti ction g goal

  • als. 800,000

000 smolts ts @ 4 4 fish/lb. = 1,136, 136,000 000 smolts ts @ 5 fish/ h/lb. Brood

  • odstoc
  • ck need

eeds can can be e red educed . . Residual alism: Fewer er smal all fish, w which h have e been shown to residual alize, will be releas eased

  • ed. However

er, fas aster g er growth r rates es a at 4 fish/lb. may produce ce more e early maturi ring residual al m males es. The effect ect of size a e at releas ease e on survival al may be m mediated ted by the leng ngth of

  • f out
  • utmigration

n to

  • the

he oc

  • cean.