Evaluation of co-gasification of black liquor and pyrolysis liquids - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

evaluation of co gasification of black
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evaluation of co-gasification of black liquor and pyrolysis liquids - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evaluation of co-gasification of black liquor and pyrolysis liquids from a national systems perspective Zetterholm J., Wetterlund E., Pettersson K., Lundgren J., jonas.zetterholm@ltu.se Fossil free road transport sector 15-20 TWh SOU 2013:84


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Evaluation of co-gasification of black liquor and pyrolysis liquids from a national systems perspective

Zetterholm J., Wetterlund E., Pettersson K., Lundgren J.,

jonas.zetterholm@ltu.se

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fossil free road transport sector

15-20 TWh

SOU 2013:84 Fossilfrihet på väg 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Biofuel alternatives

3

Fossil Fuels

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Gasification feedstock

  • Black liquor

– Limited availability – Low energy content – Catalytic effect

  • (good for gasification)
  • Pyrolysis liquid

– Fast pyrolysis process – High energy content

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Scope

  • Is BL/PL gasification favourable from the

national systems perspective?

– Entire value chain – Biomass availability – Industry localisation

  • Does economy of scale outweigh increased

specific biomass usage?

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Black liquor

Mill RB BL Mill products Pulpwood

Chem. steam El

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Black liquor gasification

Mill BFP BL Mill products Pulpwood

Chem. steam El

Biofuel (MeOH) Biomass BB

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Co-gasification of BL and PL

Mill BFP BL Mill products Pulpwood

Chem. steam El

Biofuel (MeOH) Biomass PL BB

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fast pyrolysis

9

Pre- treatment Pyrolysis ~500°C Quench Char combustor Feedstock Heat Heat Heat Char Non-condensable gases Pyrolysis Liquid

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fast pyrolysis localisation

  • Close to biomass

10

  • Heat integration
  • Biomass infrastructure
  • Boiler available
  • Heat integration
  • Biomass infrastructure
  • PL feed from sawmill

waste Stand alone CHP Sawmill

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Supply chain configurations

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Large-scale biofuel plants where…?

Transports Areas Distances Geographic aspects Biomass feedstock Supply Demand Competition Production facilities Plant sizes Integration Biorefineries Environmental goals International markets

Policies

Sustainability

Biofuels

slide-13
SLIDE 13

BeWhere Sweden

Supply Use Biofuel demand Industries GAMS/CPLEX New plants Biomass Biofuel Transport network Biomass

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Black liquor gasification

14

5 10 15 20 RB: all RB > 25 y Biofuel [TWh/a]

20 mills 11 mills

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Biofuel production 9 TWh/a, old boilers

15

0,5 1 1,5 2 1 2 3 4 5 BLG BLG + BL/PLG

  • Spec. biomass [biomass/fuel]
  • Spec. investment [MEUR/GW]

Inv.: Biofuel plant (spec.) Inv.: Pyrolysis plant (spec.) Biomass usage (spec.)

11 mills 2 mills

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Biofuel production 9 TWh/a, old boilers

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Biofuel production 19 TWh/a

17

0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 1 2 3 4 5 RB: All RB: All RB > 25 y BLG BLG + BL/PLG

  • Spec. biomass [biomass/fuel]
  • Spec. investment [MEUR/GW]

Inv.: Biofuel plant (spec.) Inv.: Pyrolysis plant (spec.) Biomass usage (spec.)

20 mills 5 mills 5 mills

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Result summary

18

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 1 2 3 4 5 RB > 25 y RB > 25 y RB: All RB: All RB > 25 y BLG BLG + BL/PLG BLG BLG + BL/PLG 9 Twh/a 19 TWh/a

  • Spec. biomass [biomass/fuel]
  • Spec. investment [MEUR/GW]

Inv.: Biofuel plant (spec.) Inv.: Pyrolysis plant (spec.) Biomass usage (spec.)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • BL/PLG leads to lower cost for a specific biofuel

demand

  • Co gasification results in

– Higher specific biomass demand – Lower specific investment requirement

  • Fewer mills needs to be converted

– BLG: 11 mills, BLG + BL/PLG: 2 mills

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Acknowledgements

The work has been carried out under the auspices of “Forskarskola Energisystem” financed by the Swedish Energy Agency. Bio4Energy. The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels (f3) and the Swedish Research Council Formas are also acknowledged for financial support.

20