PRESENTATION FOR: CITY OF SUMMERSIDE ELECTRICITY CAPACITY RESOURCE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PRESENTATION FOR: CITY OF SUMMERSIDE ELECTRICITY CAPACITY RESOURCE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PRESENTATION FOR: CITY OF SUMMERSIDE ELECTRICITY CAPACITY RESOURCE PLAN OPEN HOUSE February 28 th , 2019 www. dunsky.com (514) 504-9030 | info@dunsky.com DUNSKY OVERVIEW EXPERTISE SERVICES ASSESS DESIGN EVALUATE EFFICIENCY RENEWABLES


slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.dunsky.com

(514) 504-9030 | info@dunsky.com

CITY OF SUMMERSIDE ELECTRICITY CAPACITY RESOURCE PLAN OPEN HOUSE

February 28th, 2019

PRESENTATION FOR:

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

DUNSKY OVERVIEW

SERVICES EXPERTISE

ASSESS

  • pportunities

DESIGN

strategies

EVALUATE

performance

EFFICIENCY RENEWABLES MOBILITY

CLIENTELE*

Governments ▪ Utilities ▪ ▪ Private firms ▪ Non-profits

* selection of clients

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

INTRODUCTION TO CAPACITY PLANNING INTRODUCTION TO CAPACITY PLANNING CAPACITY OPTIONS CAPACITY OPTIONS QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION CONTEXT OF THE STUDY CONTEXT OF THE STUDY NEXT STEPS NEXT STEPS RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

PROJECT OVERVIEW

PROJECT INTRODUCTION

The City of Summerside hired Dunsky to study options and make recommendations on how to deal with Summerside Electric’s capacity needs 15 years into the future.

Understanding Summerside’s System Compile Capacity Planning Requirements Confirm the Peak Load Forecast Initial Stakeholder Input to Inform Analysis Comparative Analysis of Capacity Resource Characteristics and Costs Draft Recommendations and Presentation Refine Recommendations

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

INTRODUCTION TO CAPACITY PLANNING

CAPACITY AND ITS ROLE

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

INTRODUCTION TO CAPACITY PLANNING

Capacity planning:

Forecasting what is needed to meet customers’ demands for electricity at all times given foreseeable emergencies and contingencies.

Requirements:

North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) reliability standards.

WHAT IS CAPACITY PLANNING?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

INTRODUCTION TO CAPACITY PLANNING

CAPACITY – ENERGY ANALOGY

More efficient/cost-effective for general, everyday purposes such as driving to work

With capacity planning, we need to plan for those days when we need the extra space. The rationale for buying a car for regular, everyday use represents energy planning: How much energy do we need over the course of the year, and how do we provide it in a cost-effective and sustainable way?

Required for family outings and events, when everyone needs to fit

The rationale for buying a van (or ensuring that one is available) for those times when we need more space represents capacity planning: How much energy do we need at those few times when demand for energy (or space, in the case of our analogy) is highest?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

INTRODUCTION TO CAPACITY PLANNING

CAPACITY – ENERGY

Image from: https://consequential-lca.org/clca/the-functional-unit/determining-market-boundaries/example-temporal-markets-electricity/

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

INTRODUCTION TO CAPACITY PLANNING

CAPACITY & ENERGY SOURCES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

CONTEXT

WHAT WE’RE DOING AND WHY WE’RE DOING IT

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

PROJECT OVERVIEW

SUMMERSIDE’S EXISTING CAPACITY MIX

  • 5

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035

Capacity (MW)

Diesel Wind Imports Demand-Side Capacity Requirements (MW)

42 MW Deficit Existing Plan and Commitments Gap to be Addressed by Capacity Planning Study

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

CAPACITY OPTIONS

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

CAPACITY OPTIONS

INITIAL OPTIONS REVIEWED

  • Imports
  • Diesel Generator -

Petrodiesel

  • Diesel Generator -

Biodiesel

  • Grid-Scale Battery

Storage

  • Behind-the-Meter Battery
  • Wind
  • Biomass
  • Municipal Solid Waste

Supply-Side Options to Pursue

  • Compressed-Air Energy

Storage

  • Solar
  • Coal
  • Geothermal
  • Hydro and Pumped

Storage

  • Natural Gas
  • Nuclear

Supply-Side Options Not to Pursue

  • Expand Heat for Less Now

(HFLN)

  • Expand Interruptible Load

Program Demand-Side Options Identifying Capacity Options Qualitative Evaluation Quantitative Assessment Recommended Capacity Option

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

CAPACITY OPTIONS

QUALITATIVE EVALUATION

Identifying Capacity Options Qualitative Evaluation Quantitative Assessment Recommended Capacity Option

Type of Objective Attribute Definition/Description Policy Approvable Acceptable to policy makers and citizenry Low Cost Does not significantly increase electric rates GHG Intensity Qualitative assessment of level of GHG emissions in comparison to

  • ther options

Renewable Resources that are replenished on a human timescale Technical Black Start Provides the ability to restore an electrical system’s operations without relying on an external transmission network to recover from a shutdown (known as “black start” capability) Reliable Available to serve winter peak load; meets NERC requirements Resilient Available during long-duration outage events Policy & Technical Secure Located on-Island Diversity Contributes to greater fuel and/or technology diversity on the system Modular & Scalable Can be installed in smaller increments over time instead of in one large investment

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

CAPACITY OPTIONS

QUALITATIVE EVALUATION

Identifying Capacity Options Qualitative Evaluation Quantitative Assessment Recommended Capacity Option Meets Technical Objectives Meets Policy Objectives

Municipal Solid Waste Biomass Wind Grid-Scale Battery Storage Biodiesel Generator Heat-For-Less-Now Program Expansion Diesel Generator Behind-the-Meter Batteries New Brunswick Power Imports Interruptible Load Program Expansion

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

CAPACITY OPTIONS

QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT

Identifying Capacity Options Qualitative Evaluation

Quantitative Assessment Recommended Capacity Option

Selected for Quantitative Analysis:

  • New Brunswick Power imports (baseline option)
  • Expansion of the Heat For Less Now (HFLN) program
  • Expansion of the Interruptible Load program (ILP)
  • Grid-scale battery storage
  • Biodiesel generator
  • Diesel generator
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

ANALYSIS RESULTS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

ANALYSIS RESULTS

KEY TAKEAWAYS

 Demand-side options have the most advantageous business case to Summerside  Based on projected cost assumptions for imports, every assessed option has a positive economic case relative to imports either immediately or in the medium term (2025)  All analyzed capacity options result in a reduction in revenue requirements  No single capacity option except for imports is capable of covering all of Summerside’s future capacity deficit

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

ANALYSIS RESULTS

SUMMARY

Options Levelized Unit Cost ($/kW/year) Net Present Value (NPV) Average Revenue Requirement Impacts (% over lifetime) % of Capacity Resources On- Island (by 2035) Relative GHG Emissions (qualitative) Imports (Baseline against which alternatives are compared) Diesel 2020 $ 96 $ 0.2 M

  • 0.2%

49% High 2025 $ 96 $ 3.2 M

  • 0.6%

49% High Heat for Less Now $ 72 $ 7.0 M

  • 2.2%

36% Low Interruptible Load $ 12 $ 3.4 M

  • 0.5%

28% Medium Battery Storage 2020 $ 249 ($ 4.2 M) + 1.4% 31% Low 2025 $ 166 $ 1.7 M

  • 0.7%

31% Low 2030 $ 120 $ 4.4 M

  • 1.8%

31% Low Biodiesel 2020 $ 97 ($ 0.8 M)

  • 0.1%

49% Medium 2025 $ 97 $ 2.4 M

  • 0.4%

49% Medium Most desirable Least desirable

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

RECOMMENDATION

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

RECOMMENDATION

STACKED, STAGED APPROACH

2020

  • 1. DEMAND-SIDE INVESTMENTS

3.3 MW Interruptible Load 2.3 MW of HFLN migrated to direct-control 4.6 MW of new HFLN capacity

2023 - 2025

  • 2. BATTERY STORAGE PILOT

5 MW battery at cost- effectiveness

2025 2028

  • 3. BIODIESEL GENERATOR

2030

  • 5. EXPAND BATTERY STORAGE

Additional 5 MW of storage capacity

2034

  • 4b. WIND REFURBISHMENT

12 MW

  • 4a. WIND REFURBISHMENT

9 MW West Cape Wind

 A staged approach that “stacks” multiple capacity sources rather than relying on one option only may allow Summerside to meet its goal of supplying a greater share of its capacity needs with on- Island resources.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

RECOMMENDATION

ANALYZED CAPACITY MIX

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

RECOMMENDATION

SUMMARY VALUES

Capacity Options Levelized Cost

  • f Capacity

($/kW/year) Net Present Value Average Revenue Requirements Impacts Over Lifetime % of Capacity Resources on- Island by 2035 Recommendation $52 $18.9M

  • 2.9%

100%

 Recommendation results in positive NPV and net-positive cash-flow beginning in 2020.  Results in a decline in Summerside’s revenue requirement as a result of the avoided energy and capacity import costs.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

RECOMMENDATION

 Secure, reliable and diverse resource mix  Maintains flexibility moving forward, despite fast-paced technological and policy changes

 Avoids technology lock-in (e.g. investing in an option that may become too outdated in comparison to other emerging opportunities)  Hedges against technology innovation (e.g., emerging technologies or significant cost reductions in newer options)  Allows Summerside to adapt its system to changing conditions (e.g. electrification of heating and transportation)  Enables adaptation to changing policy directions and considerations related to increasing demand for renewable energy  Allows additional analysis prior to any particular option being implemented (for example, the ability to decommission existing diesel generators earlier or adding imports for diversity purposes)

BENEFITS

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

RECOMMENDATION

 While imports are not included in the presented analysis, they can be a beneficial part of Summerside’s electric system:

 Enhances ability to monitor technology advancements

  • Locking all aspects of the system into today’s technology can be expensive and

less effective

 Increases diversity of supply

  • Greater diversity provides a more reliable system and can reduce costs

 Enables demand-side opportunities analysis

  • Potential has not been analyzed in detail

 Role of imports

 No single option should exceed 50% of the portfolio  Performance of resources should not be closely correlated  Stagger lifetimes of resources

THE ROLE OF IMPORTS

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

NEXT STEPS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

SCHEDULE & NEXT STEPS

NEXT STEPS

 Receive and engage with stakeholder input

Understand Summerside’s System Compile Capacity Planning Requirements Confirm the Peak Load Forecast Initial Stakeholder Input to Inform Analysis Comparative Analysis of Capacity Resource Characteristics and Costs Draft Recommendations and Presentation Refine Recommendations

 Revise report as necessary  Submit final report to City

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

dunsky.com

LEARN MORE CONTACT

Julie-Ann Vincent

Senior Consultant julie-ann.vincent@dunsky.com (902) 222-7533