Suzanne White Brahmia Department of Physics University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

suzanne white brahmia department of physics university of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Suzanne White Brahmia Department of Physics University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Yale University CTL Helmsley STEM EducaAon Series December 2014 Suzanne White Brahmia Department of Physics University of Washington 11/17/17 1 Collabora've Principal Inves'gators Andrew Boudreaux; Western Washington University Stephen


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Suzanne White Brahmia Department of Physics University of Washington

Yale University CTL Helmsley STEM EducaAon Series December 2014

11/17/17 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Collabora've Principal Inves'gators

Andrew Boudreaux; Western Washington University Stephen Kanim; New Mexico State University

2

This work is supported by NSF DUE-1045227, NSF DUE-1045231, NSF DUE-1045250

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why do you require physics?

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why do you require physics?

  • Dean of School of Pharmacy
  • Dean of the School of Engineering

Goal: Students learn to think more like expert physicists

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why do you require physics?

  • Dean of School of Pharmacy
  • Dean of the School of Engineering

Goal: Students learn to think more like expert physicists

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Thinking like a physicist

  • MathemaLzaLon as a way of reasoning.
  • ExperimentaLon as a way of creaLng knowledge.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Thinking like a physicist

  • Mathema'za'on as a way of reasoning.
  • ExperimentaLon as a way of creaLng knowledge.

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MathemaLzaLon involves…

  • represenLng ideas symbolically,
  • defining problems quanLtaLvely,
  • producing soluLons,
  • and checking for coherence.

All in a coordinated effort to understand how the world works.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Do students learn to mathemaLze through observaLon?

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

hUp://juni.osfc.ac.uk/Extension/level_2_extension/Science/lesson1/ equaLon_triangles.asp

…they learn recipes:

“There are many occasions when you have to use an equaAon in Science, parAcularly in Physics. The EquaAon Triangles are a way in which you can easily learn to use and rearrange equaAons, even if you are not confident in your Maths.”

slide-11
SLIDE 11

…they learn recipes:

“There are many occasions when you have to use an equaAon in Science, parAcularly in Physics. The EquaAon Triangles are a way in which you can easily learn to use and rearrange equaAons, even if you are not confident in your Maths.”

hUp://juni.osfc.ac.uk/Extension/level_2_extension/Science/lesson1/ equaLon_triangles.asp

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AffecLve measures reveal counterproducLve pracLces

(from CLASS, 2006, 42 statement survey)

  • When I solve a physics problem, I locate an equaLon

that uses the variables given in the problem and plug in the values.

  • I do not expect physics equaLons to help my

understanding of the ideas; they are just for doing calculaLons.

  • If I want to apply a method used for solving one

physics problem to another problem, the problems must involve very similar situaLons.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • CLASS (Adams et al. 2006) U of Colorado, Boulder–

typically average of ~10-15% drop in expert-like responses

  • MPEX (1998) U of Md –showed systema'c

deteriora'on in exper'se of student responses regarding the use of math in physics

  • The deterioraLon is less severe in interacLve

engagement courses.

13

AffecLve measures: Learning Adtudes Surveys

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • CLASS (Adams et al. 2006) U of Colorado, Boulder–

typically average of ~10-15% drop in expert-like responses

  • MPEX (Redish et al. 1998) U of Md –showed

systema'c deteriora'on in exper'se of student responses regarding the use of math in physics

  • The deterioraLon is less severe in interacLve

engagement courses.

14

AffecLve measures: Learning Adtudes Surveys

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • CLASS (Adams et al. 2006) U of Colorado, Boulder–

typically average of ~10-15% drop in expert-like responses

  • MPEX (Redish et al. 1998) U of Md –showed

systema'c deteriora'on in exper'se of student responses regarding the use of math in physics

  • The deterioraLon is less severe in interacLve

engagement courses.

15

AffecLve measures: Learning Adtudes Surveys

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Physics is one of the few disciplines in which this kind of mathemaLcal sense-making is essenLal to its discourse. And this mathemaLzaLon is idiosyncraLc and thereby can only be taught by physicists.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Physics is one of the few disciplines in which this kind of mathemaLcal sense-making is essenLal to its discourse. And this mathemaLzaLon is idiosyncraLc and thereby can only be taught by physicists.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Problems

  • 1. Most students leave their introductory college

physics course with less expert-like mathemaLzaLon than before they started.

  • 2. There are disproporLonately few African

American, LaLno and NaLve American physics majors and graduate students in physics. To mathemaLze in physics means to go back and forth between the physical and the symbolic worlds.

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Problems

  • 1. Most students leave their introductory college

physics course with less expert-like mathemaLzaLon than before they started.

  • 2. There are disproporLonately few African

American, LaLno and NaLve American physics majors and graduate students in physics. To mathemaLze in physics means to go back and forth between the physical and the symbolic worlds.

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Problems

  • 1. Most students leave their introductory college

physics course with less expert-like mathemaLzaLon than before they started.

  • 2. There are disproporLonately few African

American, LaLno and NaLve American physics majors and graduate students in physics. To mathemaLze in physics means to go back and forth between the physical and the symbolic worlds.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

How do successful students mathemaLze?

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Features of successful problem solving

  • Bing and Redish (2012) –interplay between

formal mathema'cal manipula'on and physical sense-making essen'al to success

  • Sherin (2001) - Engineering students (elite) in

last physics course: flexible and genera've understanding of equa'ons is essen'al

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Features of successful problem solving

  • Bing and Redish (2012) –interplay between

formal mathema'cal manipula'on and physical sense-making essen'al to success

  • Sherin (2001) - flexible and genera've

understanding of equa'ons is essen'al

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Features of successful problem solving

  • Bing and Redish (2012) –interplay between

formal mathema'cal manipula'on and physical sense-making essen'al to success

  • Sherin (2001) - flexible and genera've

understanding of equa'ons is essen'al

24

  • Torigoe and Gladding (2012) –reasoning about

symbolic representaLons correlates to course grades, and the strongest correla'on is for the boFom quar'le of the students.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

MathemaLzing

A flexible understanding of equaLons is essenLal. A genera've use of mathemaLcs is a hallmark

  • f physics for which students have liUle

preparaLon. Our discipline has the potenLal to foster both.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

MathemaLzing

A flexible understanding of equaLons is essenLal. A genera've use of mathemaLcs is a hallmark

  • f physics for which students have liUle

preparaLon. Our discipline has the potenLal to foster both. But do we?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

How do most students mathemaLze?

Obstacles

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

How do most students mathemaLze?

Obstacles

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Concepts in the introductory course are well within a physicists’ limits of mathemaLzaLon, but are beyond or just at the edge of most students’. Most instructors have forgoUen what its like to struggle in this way.. have.

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Rutgers study

  • A collecLon of mulLple-choice proporLonal

reasoning items was given as a pretest during the first week of in Fall 2013.

  • The collecLon contained 19 items distributed on

three pretests in three different subjects (Mechanics, E & M and Chemistry.

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Rutgers study

  • A collecLon of mulLple-choice proporLonal

reasoning items was given as a pretest during the first week of in Fall 2013.

  • The collecLon contained 19 items distributed on

three pretests in three different subjects (Mechanics, E & M and Chemistry.

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Heffalumps and woozles

Consider the following statement about Winnie the Pooh’s dream: “There are three Ames as many heffalumps as woozles.” A correct equaLon to represent this statement, using h for the number of heffalumps and w for the number

  • f woozles, is:
  • a. 3h / w
  • b. 3h = w
  • c. 3h + w
  • d. h = 3w
  • e. None of these
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Heffalumps and woozles

Consider the following statement about Winnie the Pooh’s dream: “There are three Ames as many heffalumps as woozles.” A correct equaLon to represent this statement, using h for the number of heffalumps and w for the number

  • f woozles, is:
  • a. 3h / w
  • b. 3h = w
  • c. 3h + w
  • d. h = 3w
  • e. None of these

Reversal Correct

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Heffalumps and woozles

Consider the following statement about Winnie the Pooh’s dream: “There are three Ames as many heffalumps as woozles.” A correct equaLon to represent this statement, using h for the number of heffalumps and w for the number

  • f woozles, is:
  • a. 3h / w
  • b. 3h = w
  • c. 3h + w
  • d. h = 3w
  • e. None of these

Reversal Correct 4% 37% 3% 47% 9%

Nmatched=685

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Heffalumps and woozles

Consider the following statement about Winnie the Pooh’s dream: “There are three Ames as many heffalumps as woozles.” A correct equaLon to represent this statement, using h for the number of heffalumps and w for the number

  • f woozles, is:
  • a. 3h / w
  • b. 3h = w
  • c. 3h + w
  • d. h = 3w
  • e. None of these

Reversal Correct 4% 37% 3% 47% 9% 3% 37% 2% 49% 9% σpooled=1.8% p-value = 0.8418

Nmatched=685

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Rice Ques'ons

36

Bartholomew is making rice pudding using his grandmother’s

  • recipe. For three servings of pudding the ingredients include 0.75

pints of milk and 0.5 cups of rice. Bartholomew looks in his refrigerator and sees he has one pint of milk. Given that he wants to use all of the milk, which of the following expressions will help Bartholomew figure out how many cups of rice he should use?

0.5/0.75 0.75/0.5 0.5 x 0.75 (0.5 + 1) x 0.75 none of these

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Bartholomew is making rice pudding using his grandmother’s

  • recipe. For three servings of pudding the ingredients include 0.75

pints of milk and 0.5 cups of rice. Bartholomew looks in his refrigerator and sees he has one pint of milk. Given that he wants to use all of the milk, which of the following expressions will help Bartholomew figure out how many cups of rice he should use?

0.5/0.75 0.75/0.5 0.5 x 0.75 (0.5 + 1) x 0.75 none of these

Rice Ques'ons

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Numerical Complexity (Calculus-based Intro Mechanics)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Characteris'cs

39

Top 20%

(nsample=98)

The rest (nsample=363) Effect size SAT_M 710 670 11.4 FCI % pre/change 65/+9 42/+9

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Characteris'cs

40

Top 20%

(nsample=98)

The rest (nsample=363) Effect size SAT_M 710 670 11.4 FCI % pre/change 65/+9 42/+9 Math Reasoning % pre/ change 51/+4 43/-2 2.3/4.4

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Characteris'cs

41

Top 20%

(nsample=98)

The rest (nsample=363) Effect size SAT_M 710 670 11.4 FCI % pre/change 65/+9 42/+9 Math Reasoning % pre/ change 51/+4 43/-2 2.3/4.4 CLASS Problem Solving (Gen) % pre/change 71/-2 62/-10 CLASS Personal Interest % pre/change 73/0 65/-9

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Characteris'cs

42

Top 20%

(nsample=98)

The rest (nsample=363) Effect size SAT_M 710 670 11.4 FCI % pre/change 65 42 Math Reasoning % pre/ change 51 43 2.3/4.4 CLASS Problem Solving (Gen) % pre/change 71 62 CLASS Personal Interest % pre/change 73 65

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Characteris'cs

43

Top 20%

(nsample=98)

The rest (nsample=363) Effect size SAT_M 710 670 11.4 FCI % pre/change +9 +9 Math Reasoning % pre/ change +4

  • 2

2.3/4.4 CLASS Problem Solving (Gen) % pre/change

  • 2
  • 10

CLASS Personal Interest % pre/change

  • 9
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Characteris'cs

44

Top 20%

(nsample=98)

The rest (nsample=363) Effect size SAT_M 710 670 11.4 FCI % pre/change 65/+9 42/+9 Math Reasoning % pre/ change 51/+4 43/-2 2.3/4.4 CLASS Problem Solving (Gen) % pre/change 71/-2 62/-10 CLASS Personal Interest % pre/change 73/0 65/-9 Average of the Median MHI High School Q 0.9*Q

p-value < .02

5.5

slide-45
SLIDE 45

NJ school math and socioeconomics (J. Anyon 1980)

MHI Quin'le Socioeconomic Status Schoolwork culture 2nd Working class Work is evaluated for obedience to procedure. Students learn to imitate the teacher in math class. 3rd-4th Middle class Work is gedng the right answer. CreaLve acLviLes are

  • ccasional, for fun but not part of learning. Students

are given some choice in math on which of two procedures to use to get an answer. 4th-5th Affluent professional Work is a creaLve acLvity carried out independently. The products of work should show individuality. Students gather data and use it to learn about mathemaLcal processes. Top 1% ExecuLve elite Work is developing one’s intellectual powers; students invent ways to measure and calculate in math class.

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

NJ school math and socioeconomics (J. Anyon 1980)

MHI Quin'le Socioeconomic Status Schoolwork culture 2nd Working class Work is evaluated for obedience to procedure. Students learn to imitate the teacher in math class. 3rd-4th Middle class Work is geXng the right answer. CreaLve acLviLes are occasional, for fun but not part of learning. Students are given some choice in math on which of two procedures to use to get an answer. 4th-5th Affluent professional Work is a crea've ac'vity carried out independently. The products of work should show individuality. Students gather data and use it to learn about mathemaLcal processes. Top 1% ExecuLve elite Work is developing one’s intellectual powers; students invent ways to measure and calculate in math class.

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

“The biggest obstacle to success is NOT limitaLon with math skills or knowing the definiLon of density…It’s the insLtuLonal suppression of thinking.”

  • Richard Steinberg 2011
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Problems

  • 1. Most students leave their introductory college

physics course with less expert-like mathemaLzaLon than before they started.

  • 2. There are disproporLonately few African

American, LaLno and NaLve American physics majors and graduate students in physics. To mathemaLze in physics means to go back and forth between the physical and the symbolic worlds.

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

0% 5% 10% 2001 2005 2009 Physics Black Physics Hispanic Biology black Biology Hispanic Chemistry black Chemistry Hispanic

The percentage of the Bachelor’s degrees granted to select underrepresented minori'es*

*NaLonal Science FoundaLon’s NaLonal Center for Science and Engineering StaLsLcs

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

0% 5% 10% 2001 2005 2009 Physics Black Physics Hispanic Biology black Biology Hispanic Chemistry black Chemistry Hispanic

The percentage of the Bachelor’s degrees granted to select underrepresented minori'es*

*NaLonal Science FoundaLon’s NaLonal Center for Science and Engineering StaLsLcs

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Slide courtesy of Michael Marder

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Slide courtesy of Michael Marder

slide-53
SLIDE 53

On the surface, this seems like a problem with prior math

  • instrucAon. But it’s not – math in physics has different goals

than math in math. Teaching the mathemaAcal habits of mind that are characterisAc of physics thinking should be a major goal of physics instrucAon at all levels. Physics – flexible and generaLve mathemaLcs in context Math – axiomaLc reasoning in the absence of context

Somebody else’s problem

slide-54
SLIDE 54

On the surface, this seems like a problem with prior math

  • instrucAon. But it’s not – math in physics has different goals

than math in math. Teaching the mathemaAcal habits of mind that are characterisAc of physics thinking should be a major goal of physics instrucAon at all levels. Physics – flexible and generaLve mathemaLcs in context Math – axiomaLc reasoning in the absence of context

Somebody else’s problem

slide-55
SLIDE 55

On the surface, this seems like a problem with prior math

  • instrucAon. But it’s not – math in physics has different goals

than math in math. Teaching the mathemaAcal habits of mind that are characterisAc of physics thinking should be a major goal of physics instrucAon at all levels. Physics – flexible and generaLve mathemaLcs in context Math – axiomaLc reasoning in the absence of context

Somebody else’s problem

slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • Instructors naturally assume students have a

conceptual mastery of arithmeLc and algebra.

  • What students master in their math courses is

largely procedural.

  • Many students have very liUle conceptual

understanding of what they are doing or why they do it when they do math.

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57
  • Instructors naturally assume students have a

conceptual mastery of arithmeLc and algebra.

  • What students master in their math courses is

largely procedural, and not conceptual.

  • Many students have very liUle conceptual

understanding of what they are doing or why they do it when they do math.

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Problems

  • 1. Most students leave their introductory college

physics course with less expert-like mathemaLzaLon than before they started.

  • 2. There are disproporLonately few African

American, LaLno and NaLve American physics majors and graduate students in physics.hemaLze in physics means to go back and forth between the physical and the symbolic worlds.

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Problem

Most physics students, and especially students from low SES high schools, struggle to assimilate the habits of mind we model, and they leave our courses with even less expert-like mathemaLcal adtudes and habits.mathemaLze in physics means to go back and forth between the physical and the symbolic worlds.

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60
slide-61
SLIDE 61

Procedural Mastery + Conceptual Understanding

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Procedural Mastery + Conceptual Understanding

Proceptual Understanding

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Flexible and generaLve in early math

(Gray and Tall 1994)

Find 47-35

  • Procedure: Use number line, start at 47 count lew 35

places

  • Process(Flexibility): Start at 35, move to the right 12

places

  • Proceptual (GeneraLve): x=a-b represents the

mathemaLcal idea “difference” ; and x=a-b implies that a=x+b Note the foundaLonal thinking for the physics noLon of Δ: Δv=vf-vo therefore vf=Δv + vo

63

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Flexible and generaLve in early math

(Gray and Tall 1994)

Find 47-35

  • Procedure: Use number line, start at 47 count lew 35

places

  • Process(Flexibility): Start at 35, move to the right 12

places

  • Proceptual (GeneraLve): x=a-b represents the

mathemaLcal idea “difference” ; and x=a-b implies that a=x+b Note the foundaAonal thinking for the physics idea of Δ: ΔT=Tf -To therefore Tf=ΔT + To

64

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Flexible and generaLve in early math

(Gray and Tall 1994)

Find 47-35

  • Procedure: Use number line, start at 47 count lew 35

places

  • Process(Flexibility): Start at 35, move to the right 12

places

  • Proceptual (GeneraLve): x=a-b represents the

mathemaLcal idea “difference” ; and x=a-b implies that a=x+b Note the foundaAonal thinking for the physics idea of Δ: ΔT=Tf -To therefore Tf=ΔT + To

65

comparison

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Flexible and generaLve in early math

(Gray and Tall 1994)

Find 47-35

  • Procedure: Use number line, start at 47 count lew 35

places

  • Process(Flexibility): Start at 35, move to the right 12

places

  • Proceptual (GeneraLve): x=a-b represents the

mathemaLcal idea “difference” ; and x=a-b implies that a=x+b Note the foundaAonal thinking for the physics idea of Δ: ΔT=Tf -To therefore Tf=ΔT + To

66

accumulaAon comparison

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Proceptual divide

The mathemaLcs of flexible procepts is easier than the mathemaLcs of inflexible

  • procedures. The gap is widening because the

less successful are actually doing a qualitaLvely harder form of mathemaLcs. (Tall 2008)

67

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Proceptual physics

68

slide-69
SLIDE 69

69

QuanLficaLon as a scienLfic pracLce:

  • relies on a tendency to seek invariance

² Seeking invariance is at the heart of learning (Gibson & Gibson , 1955). ² Many students don’t spontaneously consider invariance when quanLfying nature in school (Simon&Blume, 1994).

  • requires a proceptual understanding of arithme'c

² Tuminaro (2004): Students who do not expect conceptual knowledge of mathemaLcs to connect to physics problems do not engage in sense making when calculaLng. ² Brahmia & Boudreaux (2016): Students errors can be traced to a failure to disLnguish products from factors when reasoning about physics quanLLes.

QuanLficaLon as a scienLfic pracLce

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

QuanLficaLon as a scienLfic pracLce:

  • relies on a tendency to seek invariance

² Seeking invariance is at the heart of learning (Gibson & Gibson , 1955). ² Many students don’t spontaneously consider invariance when quanLfying nature in school (Simon&Blume, 1994).

  • requires a proceptual understanding of arithme'c

² Tuminaro (2004): Students who do not expect conceptual knowledge of mathemaLcs to connect to physics problems do not engage in sense making when calculaLng. ² Brahmia & Boudreaux (2016): Students errors can be traced to a failure to disLnguish products from factors when reasoning about physics quanLLes.

QuanLficaLon as a scienLfic pracLce

slide-71
SLIDE 71

71

QuanLficaLon as a scienLfic pracLce:

  • relies on a tendency to seek invariance

² Seeking invariance is at the heart of learning (Gibson & Gibson , 1955). ² Many students don’t spontaneously consider invariance when quanLfying nature in school (Simon&Blume, 1994).

  • requires a proceptual understanding of arithme'c

² Tuminaro (2004): Students who do not expect conceptual knowledge of mathemaLcs to connect to physics problems do not engage in sense making when calculaLng. ² Brahmia & Boudreaux (2016): Students errors can be traced to a failure to disLnguish products from factors when reasoning about physics quanLLes.

QuanLficaLon as a scienLfic pracLce

slide-72
SLIDE 72

72

QuanLficaLon as a scienLfic pracLce:

  • relies on a tendency to seek invariance

² Seeking invariance is at the heart of learning (Gibson & Gibson , 1955). ² Many students don’t spontaneously consider invariance when quanLfying nature in school (Simon&Blume, 1994).

  • requires a proceptual understanding of arithme'c

² Tuminaro (2004): Students who do not expect conceptual knowledge of mathemaLcs to connect to physics problems do not engage in sense making when calculaLng. ² Brahmia & Boudreaux (2016): Students errors can be traced to a failure to disLnguish products from factors when reasoning about physics quanLLes.

QuanLficaLon as a scienLfic pracLce

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Sample InvenLon Sequence 1

73

Your task this Lme is to come up with a fastness index for cars with dripping oil. All the cars drip oil once a second

Start

C A D E F B

Start Start Start Start Start

This task is a liFle harder than before. A company always makes its cars go the same fastness. We will not tell you how many companies there are. You have to decide which cars are from the same company. They may look different!

slide-74
SLIDE 74

QuanLficaLon is a conceptual blend

Conceptual understanding

  • f arithmetic
  • perations and

representations Connection to the physics world Physically meaningful reasoning in introductory physics

double scope arithmeAc reasoning blend, in which two disLnct domains of thinking are merged to form a new cogniLve space opLmally suited for producLve work

slide-75
SLIDE 75

ICC (InvenLng with ContrasLng Cases) Schwartz, Chase, Oppezzo, & Chin 2011

  • InstrucLonal model designed to help students

develop the tendency to

– Seek invariance – Make sense with compound quanLLes – ContrasLng helps students noLce what maUers and what doesn’t – PreparaLon for subsequent instrucLon

75

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Invention Instruction

76

Starting Resources math procedures (disconnected) capacity to respond to prompts to calculate (rigid response) disconnected definitions of some physics concepts Coordinated set of Resources Proceptual understanding of mathematics flexibilty in mathematizing capacity to invent or imagine inventing physical quantities

Invention Tasks

(quantification and symbolizing)

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Applying ICC: Physics InvenLon Tasks

77

QF: Identify quantifable features

  • f the system

AC: Arithmetically construct index CC: Compare across contrasting cases for invariance Harel’s necessity principle Socioconstructivist framework MU: Make meaning

  • f units

NC: Evaluate in new context

CM: Clarify Mission-

To make mathematical choices to generate a useful quantity Collaborative productive failure R C : R u l e s a n d c

  • n

s t r a i n t s i m p

  • s

e d b y t h e i n v e n t i

  • n
slide-78
SLIDE 78

6mph 35mph 25mph 15mph 5mph 55mph 40mph 25mph 10mph 34mph 24mph 14mph 4mph 57mph 42mph 27mph 12mph 9mph 3mph Car A Car B Car C Car D Car E

These cars all drip oil once every second. Invent a speeding-up index that allows you to rank the cars in terms of how quickly they speed up.

Sample InvenLon Sequence 1

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Sociocultural Benefits

  • Valuing naïve understanding (Ross & Otero 2013)
  • Shiwing authority from instructor to social

consensus (Ross & Otero 2013)

  • Addressing stereotype threat: Not remediaLon;

students work, and struggle, collaboraLvely. (Steele)

  • Developing self-efficacy: InvenLon process gives
  • wnership of the knowledge to the student

(Bandera, Sawtelle)

79

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Sociocultural Benefits

  • Valuing naïve understanding (Ross & Otero 2013)
  • Shiwing authority from instructor to social

consensus (Ross & Otero 2013)

  • Addressing stereotype threat: Not remediaLon;

students work, and struggle, collaboraLvely.

(Steele & Aronson 1995)

  • Developing self-efficacy: InvenLon process gives
  • wnership of the knowledge to the student

(Bandera, Sawtelle)

80

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Sociocultural Benefits

  • Valuing naïve understanding (Ross & Otero 2013)
  • Shiwing authority from instructor to social

consensus (Ross & Otero 2013)

  • Addressing stereotype threat: Not remediaLon;

students work, and struggle, collaboraLvely.

(Steele & Aronson 1995)

  • Developing self-efficacy: InvenLon process gives
  • wnership of the knowledge to the student

(Bandura 1997, Sawtelle 2011)

81

slide-82
SLIDE 82

FCI comparison

(before the introducLon of PITs, 2003, n=102 and awer 2013/14, n=144

82

slide-83
SLIDE 83

CLASS- physics categories associated with mathemaLcal reasoning, pre-instrucLon and the gains over one semester. Combined Fall 2013 and Fall 2014, n=121.

Error bars represent the standard error.

83

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Rutgers Engineering Physics Study

  • Underprepared (precalc math placement) vs

Mainstream (calculus math placement)

  • Simultaneous courses
  • Same content, different curricula
  • FCI, Math reasoning, CLASS and some MBL

pre/post Fall 2013

84

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Rutgers Engineering Physics Study

  • Underprepared (precalc math placement) vs

Mainstream (calculus math placement)

  • Simultaneous courses
  • Same content, different curricula
  • FCI, Math reasoning, CLASS and some MBL

pre/post Fall 2013

85

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Rutgers Engineering Physics Study

  • Underprepared (precalc math placement) vs

Mainstream (calculus math placement)

  • Simultaneous courses
  • Same content, different curricula
  • FCI, Math reasoning, CLASS and some MBL

pre/post Fall 2013

86

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Rutgers Engineering Physics Study

  • Underprepared (precalc math placement) vs

Mainstream (calculus math placement)

  • Simultaneous courses
  • Same content, different curricula
  • FCI, Math reasoning, and CLASS pre/post Fall

2013

87

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Course Demographic Comparison

EAP I (Underprepared) AP I (Mainstream) # of students ~120 ~700 Mean SAT 610 680 % URM 40% 12% % female 30% 21% Median MHI

  • f sending

district 0.7*Q

p-value<.000000001

Q

88

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Course Demographic Comparison

EAP I (Underprepared) AP I (Mainstream) # of students ~120 ~700 Mean SAT 610 680 % URM 40% 12% % female 30% 21% Median MHI

  • f sending

district 0.7*Q Q

89

slide-90
SLIDE 90

90

Force Concept Inventory; σmean: EAP I (n=135) 1.4%(pre), 1.5%(post); AP I (n=757) 0.8%(pre), 0.8%(post)

slide-91
SLIDE 91

CLASS

While the EAP course shows small posiLve gains, the AP course shows negaLve gains ~10% across PS categories.

91

slide-92
SLIDE 92

MathemaLcal Reasoning Item

92

A bicycle is equipped with an odometer to measure how far it travels. A cyclist rides the bicycle up a mountain

  • road. When the odometer reading increases by 8 miles,

the cyclist gains H verLcal feet of elevaLon. Find an expression for the number of miles the odometer reading increases for every verLcal foot of elevaLon gain. H/8 8/H None of these

sin−1 H 8 # $ % & ' ( sin−1 8 H # $ % & ' (

slide-93
SLIDE 93

MathemaLcal Reasoning Item

93

A bicycle is equipped with an odometer to measure how far it travels. A cyclist rides the bicycle up a mountain

  • road. When the odometer reading increases by 8 miles,

the cyclist gains H verLcal feet of elevaLon. Find an expression for the number of miles the odometer reading increases for every verLcal foot of elevaLon gain. H/8 8/H None of these

sin−1 H 8 # $ % & ' ( sin−1 8 H # $ % & ' (

slide-94
SLIDE 94

94

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Underprepared Mainstream

Bike Path RU Fall 2013 One semester of instruc'on

pre post

slide-95
SLIDE 95

95

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Underprepared Mainstream

Bike Path RU (full year of instruc'on) n115/6 =187 and n123/4=583

pre post

slide-96
SLIDE 96

96

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

APIhigh APIlow EAPIlow

Rice Ques'ons (SES)

(full year)

pre post

slide-97
SLIDE 97

97

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

APIhigh APIlow EAPIlow

Woozles(SES)

(full year)

pre post

slide-98
SLIDE 98

98

50# 55# 60# 65# 70# 75# 80#

0.8# 1# 1.2# 1.4# 1.6# 1.8# 2# 2.2#

%"that"agree"with"experts"

CLASS"Problem"Solving"9General" APIHi#

slide-99
SLIDE 99

99

50# 55# 60# 65# 70# 75# 80#

0.8# 1# 1.2# 1.4# 1.6# 1.8# 2# 2.2#

%"that"agree"with"experts"

CLASS"Problem"Solving"9General" APIHi# APILow#

SES:

slide-100
SLIDE 100

100

50# 55# 60# 65# 70# 75# 80#

0.8# 1# 1.2# 1.4# 1.6# 1.8# 2# 2.2#

%"that"agree"with"experts"

CLASS"Problem"Solving"9General" APIHi# APILow# EAPILow#

SES:

slide-101
SLIDE 101

101

pre$ post$

50# 55# 60# 65# 70# 75# 80#

0.8# 1# 1.2# 1.4# 1.6# 1.8# 2# 2.2#

Percentage)agree)with)experts)

CLASS)Personal)Interest) APIHi#

SES:

slide-102
SLIDE 102

102

post% pre%

50# 55# 60# 65# 70# 75# 80#

0.8# 1# 1.2# 1.4# 1.6# 1.8# 2# 2.2#

Percentage)agree)with)experts)

CLASS)Personal)Interest) APIHi# APILow#

SES:

slide-103
SLIDE 103

103

SES:

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Thank you!

104

slide-105
SLIDE 105

105

hUp://faculty.uw.edu/pits Password (case sensiAve): Treehouse Physics Inven'on Tasks website: