What every scientist should know about pathology: lessons from the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

what every scientist should know about pathology lessons
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

What every scientist should know about pathology: lessons from the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Basic & translational oncology MolMed, Rotterdam Oct 9, 2018 What every scientist should know about pathology: lessons from the prostate Arno van Leenders Pathology Erasmus MC, Rotterdam The Prostate 1 cm The Prostate 1. Description


slide-1
SLIDE 1

What every scientist should know about pathology: lessons from the prostate

Arno van Leenders Pathology Erasmus MC, Rotterdam

Basic & translational oncology MolMed, Rotterdam Oct 9, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Prostate

1 cm

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Prostate

  • 1. Description
  • 2. Ink margins
  • 3. Freeze for research
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

90% 60% 5%

Frozen and FFPE samples are very heterogeneous

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pathological assessment

  • Gleason score
  • pT-stage (extra-prostatic growth)
  • Surgical margin
  • Lymph node metastasis
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Gleason grading system

  • 1966 - 2016: 50th anniversary
  • Based on tumor growth patterns
  • Accounts for tumor heterogeneity
  • Modifications in 2005 and 2016
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Normal Gleason 3

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Gleason 5 Gleason 4

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Gleason score

Gleason score: 3 + 4 = 7 Gleason 4 Gleason 3

Accounts for heterogeneity: adding 2 most common patterns

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Gleason score 6 does not cause PCa death

3+3=6 3+4=7 4+3=7 >7 n = 1101

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Gleason score 3+4=7 on biopsy

“The 2 most common patterns” G3 55% G4 45% G3 99% G4 1% Gleason score 3+4=7

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Quantification of Grade 4 component

Sauter Eur Urol 2016

6 7 (4+3) 7 (3+4) 9-10 8

G4 % in GS 7 5% 6-10% 11-20% 7 (3+4) 21-30% 31-49% 50-60% 61-80% 7 (4+3) >80% 6 7 (4+3) 7 (3+4) 9-10 8

BCRFS after radical prostatectomy

slide-15
SLIDE 15

GG 3 GG 4 GG 5

κ κ

fused ill-formed glomeruloid cribriform

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Frequency Gleason grade 4 patterns

One pattern 22% Two patterns 47% Three patterns 26% Four patterns 5% Ill-defined 66% Fused 76% Glomeruloid 28% Cribriform 38%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

without cribriform with cribriform

Cribriform GS 7 at radical prostatectomy

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cribriform GS 7 at biopsy

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cribriform GS 7 at biopsy

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Cribriform GS 7 at biopsy: BCRFS

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Cribriform growth and % GG4 are related

Parameter Percentage Gleason grade 4 P-value 0-10% 10-25% 25-50% Number 121 131 118 Age 65 (66; 61-70) 67 (68; 63-72) 68 (69; 65-72) .001 PSA (ng/mL) 7.8 (5.2; 3.7-7.1) 9.2 (5.9; 4.2-9.0) 11.7 (8.5; 5.4-13.4) <.001 % positive biopsies 51 (50; 33-67) 44 (43; 29-57) 48 (43; 29-67) .01 % tumor volume 39 (37; 25-52) 44 (45; 27-59) 50 (51; 34-65) .001 CR/IDC 7 (6%) 29 (22%) 52 (44%) <.001 Disease-specific death 4 (3%) 6 (5%) 13 (11%) .02

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Biomarkers for risk stratification

Commercial test Based Specimen Outcome Decipher 22 genes RP metastasis Oncotype DX 12 genes PBx, RP adverse PA at RP, BCR, metastasis Prolaris 31 genes PBx, RP BCR, DFS ProMark 8 genes PBx adverse PA at RP

Commercially available, standardized tests Validated in several studies Additive value to existing nomograms

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Biomarker test versus pathology 2018?

No information on % GG4 Invasive and intraductal carcinoma not considered Sampling artefact? Increased use of multiparametric MRI Additional value in contemporary cohorts to be determined

slide-24
SLIDE 24

“Easy” biomarkers in prostate cancer

Potential value for Ki67, p27, EZH2, c-MYC, PTEN, … Different antibodies, platforms, cut-offs, endpoints, … Subjective scoring “eye balling” No additional value in prostate cancer stratification

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Molecular biology of GS 3+4=7?

3+4=7 HE 3 3 3 4 cr 4 ill Growth patterns DNA/RNA Genomic black box

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Genomic instability in cribriform growth

Chua, Eur Urol 2017; Böttcher, Submitted

CR

  • +
  • +

+ + 6 3+4 4+3 8 9-10 GS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

GG4 cribriform: progressive genomic loss

GG3 Cribriform GG4

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Molecular background GG4 cribriform

CISH c-MYC in 20 prostate cancer specimens 500 cells counted (amplification if mean > 2.2)

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

GG4 ill-defined: EMT/Cadherin switching

Kolijn, Oncotarget 2015

ill-defined GG4 N-Cadherin

slide-31
SLIDE 31

1674 2016 Microscopic evolution … ?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Histopathologic delineation

? ? ? ?

Gleason grade 3

slide-33
SLIDE 33

GG 4 ill-formed

800 µm x z y Before After BABB clearing

slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35

GG 4 ill-formed GG 3 glandular GG 4 cribriform

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Take home messages

  • Gain basic knowledge of pathology
  • Far more to say, than PA report only
  • Contact your pathologist at early stage
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Thank you!

Rotterdam, NL Chris Bangma Rene Böttcher Guido Jenster Charlotte Kweldam Daan Nieboer Monique Roobol Martin van Royen Ewout Steyerberg Esther Verhoef Toronto, CA Paul Boutros Rob Bristow Michael Fraser Theo van der Kwast

g.vanleenders@erasmusmc.nl