When the light went out.. All you can think of Switch! Switchgen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

when the light went out all you can think of switch
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

When the light went out.. All you can think of Switch! Switchgen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

When the light went out.. All you can think of Switch! Switchgen Shenzhen_SFLS How does it work? How to construct it? How to apply it? How to demonstrate it? Further on How does it work? Basic Mechanism: Original


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

When the light went out.. All you can think of…

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Switch!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Switchgen

Shenzhen_SFLS

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • How does it work?
  • How to construct it?
  • How to apply it?
  • How to demonstrate it?
  • Further on
slide-6
SLIDE 6

How does it work?

Basic Mechanism: Original Antigen (affinity stronger) Mutated Antigenic Determinant (affinity weaker) both tend to combine with Antibody Finally, the stronger one win!

slide-7
SLIDE 7

How does it work?

  • Key – Antigenic Determinate
  • Circuit – Competitive Binding
  • Appliance – Effector Protein
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Background Knowledge

What inspired us?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ADCs & Inspiration

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ADCs & Inspiration

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ADCs

  • Benefits?
  • Flaws?
  • Solutions?
slide-17
SLIDE 17

CAR-T

  • CAR: chimeric antigen receptor
  • T: T lymphocyte
  • scFv: single chain fragment variable
slide-18
SLIDE 18

With Switchgen: Enhanced CAR-T

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Design

How to construct it?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How to construct it?

  • Goal: Proper interactions

– Structural Modeling – Protein Fusing – Confirmatory Experiment

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Experiment

Based on FRET

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Oh no! What should we do?

  • Key word: practical
  • DNA construction: direct synthesis (no

more PCR!!!)

  • Yeast or No?
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Modeling

Further on how to demonstrate it

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Ab with wAg + one Ag coming into one Ab

with Ag and one wAg is irreversible.

  • dx1/dt=dx2/dt=-k*x1*x2’
  • ’k=pf’
  • ‘x2=x1+m

Variable Description X1 the amount of Ag X2 the amount of Ab with Ag T Time f afinity k K=f*p x0 the inchoate value of X1 X0+m the extend of combination

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • x1= m/(exp(m*(log((m + c)/c)/m + f*p*t)) -

1)

  • ‘E=(x0-x1)/x1’ which is simplified as
  • ‘E=1- m/((exp(m*(log((m + c)/c)/m +

f*p*t)) - 1)*c)

Variable Description X1 the amount of Ag X2 the amount of Ab with Ag T Time f afinity k K=f*p x0 the inchoate value of X1 X0+m the extend of combination

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Ab—Ag Ag Key Switchgen

a b

k Ag Ab Key

Variable Descripti

  • n

a the ratio

  • f

separabili ty between Ab and Ag f afinity k K=f*p b the ratio

  • f

separabili ty between Ab and key

slide-41
SLIDE 41

X3(0)=X4(0)=X5(0)=0.

‘dx1/dt=a*x5-k*x1*x2’ ‘dx2/dt=-b*x2-k*x1*x2’ ‘dx3/dt=a*x5+b*x2’ ‘dx4/dt=b*x2+k*x1*x2’ ‘dx5/dt=-a*x5+k*x1*x2’,

Variable Description X1 the amount of Ag X2 the amount of Ab with Ag X3 the amount of Ab X4 the amount of key X5 the amount of Ab with key a the ratio of separability between Ab and Ag b the ratio of separability between Ab and key c the inchoate value of X1 d the inchoate value of X2 E the extend of combination t time

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Variable Description X1 the amount of Ag a the ratio of separability between Ab and Ag b the ratio of separability between Ab and key c the inchoate value of X1 d the inchoate value of X2 E the extend of combination t time

slide-43
SLIDE 43

dx1/dt=a*x1-b*x1*x2 ……1 dx2/dt=c*x2-b*x1*x2 ……2 'x1(0)=d''x2(0)=e'

x1 =-(d - (t*(c*(e + a*c*t) - a*c))/b)/(a*c*t^2

  • 1).

Variable Description X1 the amount of Ag X2 the amount of Ab with key b the possibility of the occurrence of the reaction c the ratio of the proliferation of Ab with key a the ratio of the proliferation of Ag E the extend of combination d The inchoate value of x1 Variable Description e The inchoate value of x2 t time

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • The Lotka–Volterra equations, also known

as the predator–prey equations, are a pair of first-order, non-linear, differential equations frequently used to describe the dynamics of biological systems in which two species interact, one as a predator and the other as prey.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Human Practice

  • Our own

We-Chat Public Platform

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Human Practice

  • Investigation 1
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Human Practice

Investigation 2

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Human Practice

  • Collaborations
  • SZMS 15 Shenzhen
  • South China University of Technology
slide-49
SLIDE 49

Human Practice

  • Meet up
  • Communication with Tito Jankowski
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Referrence

  • [1] Aaron C. Anselmo, Samir Mitragotri, An Overview of

Clinical and Commercial Impact of Drug Delivery Systems, Journal of Controlled Release (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.053

  • [2] James T. Wu, c-erbB2 oncoprotein and its soluble

ectodomain: a new potential tumor marker for prognosis early detection and monitoring patients undergoing Herceptin treatment, Clinica Chimica Acta (2002)

  • [3] Zuhaida Asra Ahmad, Swee Keong Yeap,Abdul Manaf

Ali, Wan Yong Ho, Noorjahan Banu Mohamed Alitheen, and Muhajir Hamid, scFv Antibody: Principles and Clinical Application, Clinical and Developmental Immunology, Volume 2012, Article ID 980250, 15 pages, doi:10.1155/2012/980250

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Referrence

  • [4] SWISS-MODEL Workspace:
  • Marco Biasini, Stefan Bienert, Andrew Waterhouse, Konstantin Arnold, Gabriel Studer, Tobias

Schmidt, Florian Kiefer, Tiziano Gallo Cassarino, Martino Bertoni, Lorenza Bordoli, Torsten Schwede (2014). SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information Nucleic Acids Research 2014 (1 July 2014) 42 (W1): W252-W258;

  • Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, and Schwede T (2006). The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: A web-

based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics.,22,195-201.

  • Bordoli, L., Kiefer, F., Arnold, K., Benkert, P., Battey, J. and Schwede, T. (2009). Protein structure

homology modelling using SWISS-MODEL Workspace. Nature Protocols, 4,1.

  • SWISS-MODEL Repository:
  • Kiefer F, Arnold K, Künzli M, Bordoli L, Schwede T (2009). The SWISS-MODEL Repository and

associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D387-D392.

  • Kopp J, and Schwede T (2006). The SWISS-MODEL Repository: new features and
  • functionalities. Nucleic Acids Res.,34, D315-D318.
  • SWISS-MODEL and Swiss PdbViewer
  • Guex, N., Peitsch, M.C. Schwede, T. (2009). Automated comparative protein structure modeling with

SWISS-MODEL and Swiss-PdbViewer: A historical perspective. Electrophoresis, 30(S1), S162-S173.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Attribution

  • Theory Design Group: Yuhe Wu, Yi Zhang,

Zhaoheng Li, Qixin Lin

  • Experiment Group: Jiazheng Xing, Jiafu Li,

Zhulin Chen, Fanghui He

  • Modeling Group: Zheshen Gong, Yan Xu
  • Publicity Group: Wenjing Jiang
  • Wiki Making: Junhao Cui
slide-53
SLIDE 53

Attribution

  • Instructor: Peilin Li
  • Advisors: Boxiang Wang, Yuying Zhang
  • Sponsors
slide-54
SLIDE 54

Thank you!

Shenzhen_SFLS