X-Ray Surveys Greg Hallenbeck 7 April 2010 Brandt & Hasinger - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
X-Ray Surveys Greg Hallenbeck 7 April 2010 Brandt & Hasinger - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
X-Ray Surveys Greg Hallenbeck 7 April 2010 Brandt & Hasinger 2005 Vikhlinin et. al 2009 Vikhlinin et. al 2009 Overview Previous Surveys using Chandra and XMM-Newton How are they different? What have they found? What science
Overview
- Previous Surveys using Chandra and
XMM-Newton
- How are they different?
- What have they found?
- What science does this enable?
- Future Surveys with WFXT and IXO
- How are they different?
- What science will be made possible?
Past and Current Surveys
Blue: Chandra Green: XMM-Newton Purple: Earlier Both telescopes have significantly pushed down flux limits, but their surveys cover very small areas as a consequence of long exposure times
Satellite Data
- Chandra
- Position Accuracy < 1”
- Background ~1 count / 2 months / pixel (0.5-8 keV)
- Almost no source confusion
- X-Ray Multi-Mirror Misson-Newton (XMM-Newton)
- Position Accuracy 1-3”
- Wider Field of View (2.5x Chandra's)
- Larger Collection Area
- Tends to cover larger solid angle
Source Counts and Classification
- Each survey has about 100-600 detections over
areas of 0.1-10 square degrees
- Many sources very faint optically
- Get poor or nonexistent optical spectra
- So, low completeness in:
- Redshift data (50-70%)
- Classification (< 60%)
Source Types
- AGNs
- Unobscured (0 < z < 5)
- Obscured in X-Ray but not optical/UV (z < 1.5)
- Optically Faint X-Ray Sources (1 < z < 4) (Obscured
AGNs?)
- X-Ray Bright, Optically Normal Galaxies (XBONGs) (0.05 <
z < 1)
- Other Stuff
- Starburst Galaxies (0.1 < z < 1.5)
- Galaxies and Groups (0.1 < z < 1)
- X-Ray Bright Galactic Stars
Sources Found (0.5-2 keV)
Sources Found (2-8 keV)
Cosmic X-Ray Background (CXRB)
- Discovered by Giacconi et. Al 1962
- Appeared nearly uniform over entire sky
- Later found to be mostly AGNs (~70%), but has only
been partially resolved
- Resolution Levels by these surveys:
- Have resolved ~90% of 0.5-2keV CXRB
– Previously 75% by ROSAT
- ~85% at 2-6keV
- ~60% at 6-10keV
AGN Evolution / SMBH Growth
Schmidt 1968 shows growth in number density of AGNs with z (for low z) But at deeper redshifts... Number density of moderate luminosity AGNs peak near z = 2 before dropping off sharply Can use this luminosity function to estimate SMBH masses
Demographics and Physics of High z AGNs
- The surveys are sensitive enough to detect
moderate strength AGNs at high z > 4
- Huge volume gives statistics on “typical” AGNs
- Optical surveys just see the biggest
- Some Findings:
- Distant AGNs seem to accrete in the same modes
as local AGNs
- AGNs did not dominate reionization
Surveys with WFXT: The Wide-Field X-Ray Telescope
Goal of Chandra and XMM-Newton sensitivity, but over a large area of the sky (10-25%) With estimated 100
- bjects per sq. deg,
should get tens of thousands of objects FOV of 1 sq. deg 8,000cm² collecting area
Cluster Mass Function Science
Cluster mass function is sensitive to ΩΛ and ΩM WFXT would be able to measure cluster masses out to z=2 (when they showed up) But the cluster mass function can also be used to measure the...
Growth Factor of Density Perturbations G(z)
- Indicates how small primordial
fluctuations increase with time
- G(z) increases as z decreases
- Note that the y axis is multiplied
by (1+z)
- WFXT provides independent
measure for z < 1 (shown in blue)
- Non-GR theories tend to predict
fairly different values
- DGP Model (dashed)
- Quintessence (solid)
Other Science with WFXT
- Find statistics of many unusual objects like the “Bullet
Cluster” with greatly increased search volume
- Used to find departures
from ΛCDM
- More detailed measurement
- f mass-dependent power
spectrum of groups and clusters
- Measure cluster-cluster correlation function on non-linear
scales, and over wide range of spatial scales
Surveys with IXO: The International X-Ray Observatory
- WFXT should find a lot of objects, but not collect
much information on each object
- IXO has both greater:
- Collecting Area
- Spectroscopic Resolution
- Even for high z > 2 objects, still high precision on
- Temperature
- Metallicity
- Velocity Structure
Science Made Possible with IXO
- Measure gas fraction in large, dynamically
relaxed clusters
- Use fgas ~ d
3 / 2 trend to get d(z)
and constrain ΩΛ, and Ωm
- Extend G(z) to z > 2
- Possibly as good as JDEM
- Measure “growth index” γ
- Non-GR theories give fairly
unique values
Fin
(The pun seemed funny at 3am while I was observing)