X-Ray Surveys Greg Hallenbeck 7 April 2010 Brandt & Hasinger - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

x ray surveys
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

X-Ray Surveys Greg Hallenbeck 7 April 2010 Brandt & Hasinger - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

X-Ray Surveys Greg Hallenbeck 7 April 2010 Brandt & Hasinger 2005 Vikhlinin et. al 2009 Vikhlinin et. al 2009 Overview Previous Surveys using Chandra and XMM-Newton How are they different? What have they found? What science


slide-1
SLIDE 1

X-Ray Surveys

Greg Hallenbeck 7 April 2010 Brandt & Hasinger 2005 Vikhlinin et. al 2009 Vikhlinin et. al 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Previous Surveys using Chandra and

XMM-Newton

  • How are they different?
  • What have they found?
  • What science does this enable?
  • Future Surveys with WFXT and IXO
  • How are they different?
  • What science will be made possible?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Past and Current Surveys

Blue: Chandra Green: XMM-Newton Purple: Earlier Both telescopes have significantly pushed down flux limits, but their surveys cover very small areas as a consequence of long exposure times

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Satellite Data

  • Chandra
  • Position Accuracy < 1”
  • Background ~1 count / 2 months / pixel (0.5-8 keV)
  • Almost no source confusion
  • X-Ray Multi-Mirror Misson-Newton (XMM-Newton)
  • Position Accuracy 1-3”
  • Wider Field of View (2.5x Chandra's)
  • Larger Collection Area
  • Tends to cover larger solid angle
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Source Counts and Classification

  • Each survey has about 100-600 detections over

areas of 0.1-10 square degrees

  • Many sources very faint optically
  • Get poor or nonexistent optical spectra
  • So, low completeness in:
  • Redshift data (50-70%)
  • Classification (< 60%)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Source Types

  • AGNs
  • Unobscured (0 < z < 5)
  • Obscured in X-Ray but not optical/UV (z < 1.5)
  • Optically Faint X-Ray Sources (1 < z < 4) (Obscured

AGNs?)

  • X-Ray Bright, Optically Normal Galaxies (XBONGs) (0.05 <

z < 1)

  • Other Stuff
  • Starburst Galaxies (0.1 < z < 1.5)
  • Galaxies and Groups (0.1 < z < 1)
  • X-Ray Bright Galactic Stars
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Sources Found (0.5-2 keV)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Sources Found (2-8 keV)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cosmic X-Ray Background (CXRB)

  • Discovered by Giacconi et. Al 1962
  • Appeared nearly uniform over entire sky
  • Later found to be mostly AGNs (~70%), but has only

been partially resolved

  • Resolution Levels by these surveys:
  • Have resolved ~90% of 0.5-2keV CXRB

– Previously 75% by ROSAT

  • ~85% at 2-6keV
  • ~60% at 6-10keV
slide-10
SLIDE 10

AGN Evolution / SMBH Growth

Schmidt 1968 shows growth in number density of AGNs with z (for low z) But at deeper redshifts... Number density of moderate luminosity AGNs peak near z = 2 before dropping off sharply Can use this luminosity function to estimate SMBH masses

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Demographics and Physics of High z AGNs

  • The surveys are sensitive enough to detect

moderate strength AGNs at high z > 4

  • Huge volume gives statistics on “typical” AGNs
  • Optical surveys just see the biggest
  • Some Findings:
  • Distant AGNs seem to accrete in the same modes

as local AGNs

  • AGNs did not dominate reionization
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Surveys with WFXT: The Wide-Field X-Ray Telescope

Goal of Chandra and XMM-Newton sensitivity, but over a large area of the sky (10-25%) With estimated 100

  • bjects per sq. deg,

should get tens of thousands of objects FOV of 1 sq. deg 8,000cm² collecting area

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cluster Mass Function Science

Cluster mass function is sensitive to ΩΛ and ΩM WFXT would be able to measure cluster masses out to z=2 (when they showed up) But the cluster mass function can also be used to measure the...

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Growth Factor of Density Perturbations G(z)

  • Indicates how small primordial

fluctuations increase with time

  • G(z) increases as z decreases
  • Note that the y axis is multiplied

by (1+z)

  • WFXT provides independent

measure for z < 1 (shown in blue)

  • Non-GR theories tend to predict

fairly different values

  • DGP Model (dashed)
  • Quintessence (solid)
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Other Science with WFXT

  • Find statistics of many unusual objects like the “Bullet

Cluster” with greatly increased search volume

  • Used to find departures

from ΛCDM

  • More detailed measurement
  • f mass-dependent power

spectrum of groups and clusters

  • Measure cluster-cluster correlation function on non-linear

scales, and over wide range of spatial scales

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Surveys with IXO: The International X-Ray Observatory

  • WFXT should find a lot of objects, but not collect

much information on each object

  • IXO has both greater:
  • Collecting Area
  • Spectroscopic Resolution
  • Even for high z > 2 objects, still high precision on
  • Temperature
  • Metallicity
  • Velocity Structure
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Science Made Possible with IXO

  • Measure gas fraction in large, dynamically

relaxed clusters

  • Use fgas ~ d

3 / 2 trend to get d(z)

and constrain ΩΛ, and Ωm

  • Extend G(z) to z > 2
  • Possibly as good as JDEM
  • Measure “growth index” γ
  • Non-GR theories give fairly

unique values

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Fin

(The pun seemed funny at 3am while I was observing)